Safety of BI 1358894 in patients with major depressive disorder: Results and learnings from a phase II randomized decentralized clinical trial

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Christopher Reist, Peide Li, Thuy Le Nguyen, Sigurd D. Süssmuth
{"title":"Safety of BI 1358894 in patients with major depressive disorder: Results and learnings from a phase II randomized decentralized clinical trial","authors":"Christopher Reist,&nbsp;Peide Li,&nbsp;Thuy Le Nguyen,&nbsp;Sigurd D. Süssmuth","doi":"10.1111/cts.70102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The feasibility of conducting a fully remote, interventional, phase II decentralized clinical trial (DCT) was investigated in major depressive disorder (MDD). Key learnings were collated to improve future DCTs. A double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, DCT enrolled adult MDD patients with inadequate response to first-line antidepressant monotherapy (ongoing ≥8 weeks) and a Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale total score (MADRS) ≥22 at screening. Patients were randomized 1:1 to BI 1358894 125 mg or placebo daily for 6 weeks remotely. Safety parameters, primary end point (change from baseline in MADRS at Week 6), and patient experience were assessed. The DCT was considered feasible if the trial protocol could be successfully executed. Overall, DCT procedures were successfully executed per protocol. However, despite achieving a vast patient outreach, the trial was terminated early due to deficient enrollment. Of the 136 patients who consented for enrollment and underwent screening, 45 were randomized and 43 received treatment (BI 1358894, <i>n</i> = 20; placebo, <i>n</i> = 23); 97.7% of patients completed the trial. Patients had a mean (SD) age of 42.2 (13.1) years and most (83.7%) were female. Adverse events were reported by 86.0% of patients (BI 1358894, 90.0%; placebo, 82.6%). Most patients (88%) reported a positive experience with the DCT. Key learnings related to the impact of stringent eligibility criteria, recruitment optimization strategies, plus the benefits and limitations of digital technologies. A fully remote, interventional DCT was feasible in MDD, and was well perceived by trial participants. Learnings related to recruitment optimization and trial design should be considered for future interventional DCTs.</p>","PeriodicalId":50610,"journal":{"name":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"17 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11665782/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cts.70102","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The feasibility of conducting a fully remote, interventional, phase II decentralized clinical trial (DCT) was investigated in major depressive disorder (MDD). Key learnings were collated to improve future DCTs. A double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, DCT enrolled adult MDD patients with inadequate response to first-line antidepressant monotherapy (ongoing ≥8 weeks) and a Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale total score (MADRS) ≥22 at screening. Patients were randomized 1:1 to BI 1358894 125 mg or placebo daily for 6 weeks remotely. Safety parameters, primary end point (change from baseline in MADRS at Week 6), and patient experience were assessed. The DCT was considered feasible if the trial protocol could be successfully executed. Overall, DCT procedures were successfully executed per protocol. However, despite achieving a vast patient outreach, the trial was terminated early due to deficient enrollment. Of the 136 patients who consented for enrollment and underwent screening, 45 were randomized and 43 received treatment (BI 1358894, n = 20; placebo, n = 23); 97.7% of patients completed the trial. Patients had a mean (SD) age of 42.2 (13.1) years and most (83.7%) were female. Adverse events were reported by 86.0% of patients (BI 1358894, 90.0%; placebo, 82.6%). Most patients (88%) reported a positive experience with the DCT. Key learnings related to the impact of stringent eligibility criteria, recruitment optimization strategies, plus the benefits and limitations of digital technologies. A fully remote, interventional DCT was feasible in MDD, and was well perceived by trial participants. Learnings related to recruitment optimization and trial design should be considered for future interventional DCTs.

Abstract Image

BI 1358894在重度抑郁症患者中的安全性:一项II期随机分散临床试验的结果和经验教训
研究了在重度抑郁症(MDD)中进行完全远程、介入性、II期分散临床试验(DCT)的可行性。整理了关键的经验教训,以改善未来的dct。DCT采用双盲、安慰剂对照、平行组,纳入对一线抗抑郁单药治疗反应不足(持续≥8周)且筛查时Montgomery-Åsberg抑郁评定量表总分(MADRS)≥22的成年MDD患者。患者以1:1的比例随机分配至BI 1358894 125 mg或安慰剂,每天远程治疗6周。评估了安全性参数、主要终点(第6周MADRS基线变化)和患者体验。如果试验方案能够成功执行,则认为DCT是可行的。总的来说,每个协议都成功地执行了DCT过程。然而,尽管取得了广泛的患者外展,但由于入组不足,该试验被提前终止。在136名同意入组并接受筛查的患者中,45名被随机分组,43名接受治疗(BI 1358894, n = 20;安慰剂,n = 23);97.7%的患者完成了试验。患者平均(SD)年龄为42.2(13.1)岁,大多数(83.7%)为女性。86.0%的患者报告了不良事件(BI 1358894, 90.0%;安慰剂,82.6%)。大多数患者(88%)报告了DCT的积极体验。重要的学习内容涉及严格的资格标准、招聘优化策略的影响,以及数字技术的优势和局限性。完全远程的介入性DCT在MDD中是可行的,并且被试验参与者很好地感知。在未来的干预性ct中,应考虑招募优化和试验设计方面的经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cts-Clinical and Translational Science
Cts-Clinical and Translational Science 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
234
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Translational Science (CTS), an official journal of the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, highlights original translational medicine research that helps bridge laboratory discoveries with the diagnosis and treatment of human disease. Translational medicine is a multi-faceted discipline with a focus on translational therapeutics. In a broad sense, translational medicine bridges across the discovery, development, regulation, and utilization spectrum. Research may appear as Full Articles, Brief Reports, Commentaries, Phase Forwards (clinical trials), Reviews, or Tutorials. CTS also includes invited didactic content that covers the connections between clinical pharmacology and translational medicine. Best-in-class methodologies and best practices are also welcomed as Tutorials. These additional features provide context for research articles and facilitate understanding for a wide array of individuals interested in clinical and translational science. CTS welcomes high quality, scientifically sound, original manuscripts focused on clinical pharmacology and translational science, including animal, in vitro, in silico, and clinical studies supporting the breadth of drug discovery, development, regulation and clinical use of both traditional drugs and innovative modalities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信