Experience with remote electronic portal imaging device-based dosimetric auditing for static and rotational intensity modulated radiotherapy

IF 3.4 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Peter B. Greer , Joerg Lehmann , Alisha Moore
{"title":"Experience with remote electronic portal imaging device-based dosimetric auditing for static and rotational intensity modulated radiotherapy","authors":"Peter B. Greer ,&nbsp;Joerg Lehmann ,&nbsp;Alisha Moore","doi":"10.1016/j.phro.2024.100674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The aim of this work was to evaluate results of a remote electronic portal imaging based dosimetric auditing method using Task-Group 218 clinical gamma evaluation criteria (3%,2 mm, 10% dose threshold). For intensity modulated radiation therapy the results were (mean ± 1 SD) 97.9 ± 4.5% with 31/34 audits passing (optimal level, <span><math><mo>≥</mo></math></span> 95%) and 3/34 audits failing (action level, <span><math><mo>&lt;</mo></math></span> 90%). For volumetric modulated arc therapy the results were 98.5 ± 2.3% with 32/36 audits passing (optimal level) and 4/36 passing (tolerance level, <span><math><mo>≥</mo></math></span> 90% and <span><math><mo>&lt;</mo></math></span> 95%). The audit has been successfully applied globally for clinical trial quality assurance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36850,"journal":{"name":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","volume":"32 ","pages":"Article 100674"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11663962/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631624001441","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this work was to evaluate results of a remote electronic portal imaging based dosimetric auditing method using Task-Group 218 clinical gamma evaluation criteria (3%,2 mm, 10% dose threshold). For intensity modulated radiation therapy the results were (mean ± 1 SD) 97.9 ± 4.5% with 31/34 audits passing (optimal level, 95%) and 3/34 audits failing (action level, < 90%). For volumetric modulated arc therapy the results were 98.5 ± 2.3% with 32/36 audits passing (optimal level) and 4/36 passing (tolerance level, 90% and < 95%). The audit has been successfully applied globally for clinical trial quality assurance.
具有静态和旋转调强放疗中基于远程电子门静脉成像设备的剂量学审计经验。
本研究的目的是使用Task-Group 218临床伽马评估标准(3%,2mm, 10%剂量阈值)评估基于远程电子门静脉成像的剂量学审计方法的结果。调强放疗的结果为(平均±1标准差)97.9±4.5%,其中31/34次审核通过(最佳水平,≥95%),3/34次审核不合格(行动水平,90%)。体积调节电弧治疗的结果为98.5±2.3%,32/36次审核通过(最佳水平),4/36次审核通过(容忍水平,≥90%和95%)。该审核已成功应用于全球临床试验质量保证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology Physics and Astronomy-Radiation
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
18.90%
发文量
93
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信