Retrospective clinical performance evaluation of the Abbott Bioline HAT 2.0, a rapid diagnostic test for human African trypanosomiasis based on recombinant antigens.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Sara Tablado Alonso, Sylvain Biéler, Raquel Inocêncio da Luz, Paul Verlé, Philippe Büscher, Epco Hasker
{"title":"Retrospective clinical performance evaluation of the Abbott Bioline HAT 2.0, a rapid diagnostic test for human African trypanosomiasis based on recombinant antigens.","authors":"Sara Tablado Alonso, Sylvain Biéler, Raquel Inocêncio da Luz, Paul Verlé, Philippe Büscher, Epco Hasker","doi":"10.1111/tmi.14077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rapid diagnostic tests for the serological detection of gambiense human African trypanosomiasis (gHAT) have been developed to overcome the limitations of the traditional screening method, CATT/T. b. gambiense. The Abbott Bioline human African trypanosomiasis (HAT) 2.0 rapid diagnostic test has recently been developed by Abbott using only recombinant antigens. The objective of this study was to evaluate its clinical sensitivity and specificity, in comparison with the other available rapid diagnostic tests and CATT.</p><p><strong>Methodology/principal findings: </strong>For this study, archived plasma samples from 150 gHAT cases and 150 endemic controls originating from Chad, Guinea, the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Uganda were analysed on the following tests: CATT/T. b. gambiense, the HAT Sero K-SeT, SD BIOLINE HAT and Abbott Bioline HAT 2.0 rapid diagnostic tests, and the immune trypanolysis test. The sensitivity and specificity of Abbott Bioline HAT 2.0 were 96.7% and 78.4%, respectively, and the sensitivity and specificity of SD BIOLINE HAT were 99.3% and 74.1%. The sensitivity and specificity of CATT were 98.7% and 89.2%. The sensitivity and specificity of HAT Sero K-SeT were 99.3% and 81.3%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions/significance: </strong>The sensitivity and specificity of the Abbott Bioline HAT 2.0 are comparable to those of its predecessors HAT Sero K-SeT and SD BIOLINE HAT. However, considering the decreasing prevalence of gHAT, a higher specificity of the tests used for screening is desirable to improve their positive predictive value.</p>","PeriodicalId":23962,"journal":{"name":"Tropical Medicine & International Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropical Medicine & International Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tmi.14077","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Rapid diagnostic tests for the serological detection of gambiense human African trypanosomiasis (gHAT) have been developed to overcome the limitations of the traditional screening method, CATT/T. b. gambiense. The Abbott Bioline human African trypanosomiasis (HAT) 2.0 rapid diagnostic test has recently been developed by Abbott using only recombinant antigens. The objective of this study was to evaluate its clinical sensitivity and specificity, in comparison with the other available rapid diagnostic tests and CATT.

Methodology/principal findings: For this study, archived plasma samples from 150 gHAT cases and 150 endemic controls originating from Chad, Guinea, the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Uganda were analysed on the following tests: CATT/T. b. gambiense, the HAT Sero K-SeT, SD BIOLINE HAT and Abbott Bioline HAT 2.0 rapid diagnostic tests, and the immune trypanolysis test. The sensitivity and specificity of Abbott Bioline HAT 2.0 were 96.7% and 78.4%, respectively, and the sensitivity and specificity of SD BIOLINE HAT were 99.3% and 74.1%. The sensitivity and specificity of CATT were 98.7% and 89.2%. The sensitivity and specificity of HAT Sero K-SeT were 99.3% and 81.3%.

Conclusions/significance: The sensitivity and specificity of the Abbott Bioline HAT 2.0 are comparable to those of its predecessors HAT Sero K-SeT and SD BIOLINE HAT. However, considering the decreasing prevalence of gHAT, a higher specificity of the tests used for screening is desirable to improve their positive predictive value.

基于重组抗原的非洲人类锥虫病快速诊断试剂盒雅培Bioline HAT 2.0的回顾性临床性能评价
背景:为了克服传统筛查方法CATT/T的局限性,开发了用于冈比亚人非洲锥虫病(gHAT)血清学检测的快速诊断试验。gambiense。雅培最近开发了仅使用重组抗原的雅培生物碱非洲人锥虫病(HAT) 2.0快速诊断试验。本研究的目的是评估其临床敏感性和特异性,与其他可用的快速诊断测试和CATT进行比较。方法/主要发现:在本研究中,对来自乍得、几内亚、刚果民主共和国和乌干达的150例gHAT病例和150例地方病对照的存档血浆样本进行了以下检测分析:CATT/T。b. gambiense, HAT Sero K-SeT, SD BIOLINE HAT和Abbott BIOLINE HAT 2.0快速诊断试验,以及免疫锥虫酶解试验。Abbott Bioline HAT 2.0的敏感性和特异性分别为96.7%和78.4%,SD Bioline HAT的敏感性和特异性分别为99.3%和74.1%。CATT的敏感性和特异性分别为98.7%和89.2%。HAT Sero K-SeT的敏感性和特异性分别为99.3%和81.3%。结论/意义:雅培Bioline HAT 2.0的敏感性和特异性与之前的HAT Sero K-SeT和SD Bioline HAT相当。然而,考虑到gHAT患病率的下降,用于筛查的测试的更高特异性是可取的,以提高其阳性预测值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tropical Medicine & International Health
Tropical Medicine & International Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
129
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Tropical Medicine & International Health is published on behalf of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Foundation Tropical Medicine and International Health, Belgian Institute of Tropical Medicine and Bernhard-Nocht-Institute for Tropical Medicine. Tropical Medicine & International Health is the official journal of the Federation of European Societies for Tropical Medicine and International Health (FESTMIH).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信