Robust fundamental frequency-detection algorithm unaffected by the presence of hoarseness in human voice.

IF 2.1 2区 物理与天体物理 Q2 ACOUSTICS
Itsuki Kitayama, Kiyohito Hosokawa, Shinobu Iwaki, Misao Yoshida, Akira Miyauchi, Toshihiro Kishikawa, Hidenori Tanaka, Takeshi Tsuda, Takashi Sato, Yukinori Takenaka, Makoto Ogawa, Hidenori Inohara
{"title":"Robust fundamental frequency-detection algorithm unaffected by the presence of hoarseness in human voice.","authors":"Itsuki Kitayama, Kiyohito Hosokawa, Shinobu Iwaki, Misao Yoshida, Akira Miyauchi, Toshihiro Kishikawa, Hidenori Tanaka, Takeshi Tsuda, Takashi Sato, Yukinori Takenaka, Makoto Ogawa, Hidenori Inohara","doi":"10.1121/10.0034624","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The fundamental frequency (fo) is pivotal for quantifying vocal-fold characteristics. However, the accuracy of fo estimation in hoarse voices is notably low, and no definitive algorithm for fo estimation has been previously established. In this study, we introduce an algorithm named, \"Spectral-based fo Estimator Emphasized by Domination and Sequence (SFEEDS),\" which enhances the spectrum method and conducted comparative analyses with conventional estimation methods. We analyzed 454 voice samples and used conventional methods and SFEEDS to calculate fo. The ground truth of fo was determined as the lowest frequency within the most dominant harmonic complex observed on the spectrogram. Subsequently, we assessed the concordance between each fo-estimation method and the fo ground truth. We also examined the variations in the accuracy of these methods when analyzing speech with hoarseness. Regardless of hoarseness, the fo-estimation accuracy was significantly greater by SFEEDS than by conventional methods. Moreover, whereas the conventional methods impaired fo-estimation accuracy in samples with roughness, the SFEEDS algorithm was robust and significantly reduced subharmonic errors. The SFEEDS fo-estimation algorithm accurately estimated the fo of both normal and hoarse voices.</p>","PeriodicalId":17168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Acoustical Society of America","volume":"156 6","pages":"4217-4228"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Acoustical Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0034624","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The fundamental frequency (fo) is pivotal for quantifying vocal-fold characteristics. However, the accuracy of fo estimation in hoarse voices is notably low, and no definitive algorithm for fo estimation has been previously established. In this study, we introduce an algorithm named, "Spectral-based fo Estimator Emphasized by Domination and Sequence (SFEEDS)," which enhances the spectrum method and conducted comparative analyses with conventional estimation methods. We analyzed 454 voice samples and used conventional methods and SFEEDS to calculate fo. The ground truth of fo was determined as the lowest frequency within the most dominant harmonic complex observed on the spectrogram. Subsequently, we assessed the concordance between each fo-estimation method and the fo ground truth. We also examined the variations in the accuracy of these methods when analyzing speech with hoarseness. Regardless of hoarseness, the fo-estimation accuracy was significantly greater by SFEEDS than by conventional methods. Moreover, whereas the conventional methods impaired fo-estimation accuracy in samples with roughness, the SFEEDS algorithm was robust and significantly reduced subharmonic errors. The SFEEDS fo-estimation algorithm accurately estimated the fo of both normal and hoarse voices.

一种不受人声沙哑影响的鲁棒基频检测算法。
基频(fo)是量化声部特征的关键。然而,在沙哑的声音中估计的精度很低,并且没有明确的算法来估计。在本研究中,我们引入了一种名为“基于频谱的以支配和序列为重点的估计器(SFEEDS)”的算法,对频谱法进行了改进,并与传统估计方法进行了比较分析。我们分析了454个语音样本,并使用常规方法和sfeed来计算。fo的基真值被确定为在频谱图上观察到的最主要谐波复内的最低频率。随后,我们评估了每种估计方法与地面真值之间的一致性。我们还研究了这些方法在分析声音嘶哑时准确性的变化。无论声音是否嘶哑,sfeed的估计精度都明显高于传统方法。此外,传统的方法会降低粗糙样本的估计精度,而SFEEDS算法具有鲁棒性,并显著降低了次谐波误差。SFEEDS估计算法可以准确地估计正常和沙哑声音的频率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
16.70%
发文量
1433
审稿时长
4.7 months
期刊介绍: Since 1929 The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America has been the leading source of theoretical and experimental research results in the broad interdisciplinary study of sound. Subject coverage includes: linear and nonlinear acoustics; aeroacoustics, underwater sound and acoustical oceanography; ultrasonics and quantum acoustics; architectural and structural acoustics and vibration; speech, music and noise; psychology and physiology of hearing; engineering acoustics, transduction; bioacoustics, animal bioacoustics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信