Patient reported outcomes after laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis.

IF 2.1 3区医学 Q2 SURGERY

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Pub Date : 2024-12-24 DOI:10.1007/s00423-024-03584-6

Emilie Schultz Hougaard, Lasse Kaalby Møller, Signe A Rønde Kristensen, Mai Elizabeth Høyer, Mark Bremholm Ellebaek, Issam Al-Najami

{"title":"Patient reported outcomes after laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis.","authors":"Emilie Schultz Hougaard, Lasse Kaalby Møller, Signe A Rønde Kristensen, Mai Elizabeth Høyer, Mark Bremholm Ellebaek, Issam Al-Najami","doi":"10.1007/s00423-024-03584-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The purpose of this study is to establish more evidence to provide the clinicians with a greater knowledge on the patient reported outcomes and quality of life (QoL) after laparoscopic appendectomy (LA).Method: 105 patients who had undergone LA for acute appendicitis regardless of severity, were included prospectively at Odense University Hospital, Svendborg. The patient reported consequence of surgery were assessed through the validated electronic survey from European-QoL questionnaire (5Q-5D-5L) including a self-reported VAS-score (0-100). The first survey was sent out the first day after surgery and the subsequent surveys at 7, 30 and 90 days. The replies was converted into an index-score expressing the QoL from 0 (death) to 1 (full health).Results: All patients experienced pain/discomfort at day 1. At day 7, 30 and 90 it was 95%, 45% and 25%, respectively. The median index-score at day 1, 7, 30 and 90 was 0.778, 0.840, 0.984 and 1.00, respectively.","PeriodicalId":17983,"journal":{"name":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","volume":"410 1","pages":"15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-024-03584-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to establish more evidence to provide the clinicians with a greater knowledge on the patient reported outcomes and quality of life (QoL) after laparoscopic appendectomy (LA).

Method: 105 patients who had undergone LA for acute appendicitis regardless of severity, were included prospectively at Odense University Hospital, Svendborg. The patient reported consequence of surgery were assessed through the validated electronic survey from European-QoL questionnaire (5Q-5D-5L) including a self-reported VAS-score (0-100). The first survey was sent out the first day after surgery and the subsequent surveys at 7, 30 and 90 days. The replies was converted into an index-score expressing the QoL from 0 (death) to 1 (full health).

Results: All patients experienced pain/discomfort at day 1. At day 7, 30 and 90 it was 95%, 45% and 25%, respectively. The median index-score at day 1, 7, 30 and 90 was 0.778, 0.840, 0.984 and 1.00, respectively.

查看原文本刊更多论文

患者报告急性阑尾炎腹腔镜阑尾切除术后的结果。

目的：本研究的目的是建立更多的证据，为临床医生提供更多的关于腹腔镜阑尾切除术（LA）后患者报告的结果和生活质量（QoL）的知识。方法：前瞻性纳入来自斯文堡欧登塞大学医院的105例急性阑尾炎患者，不论其严重程度如何。通过有效的欧洲生活质量问卷（5Q-5D-5L）的电子调查评估患者报告的手术后果，包括自我报告的vas评分（0-100）。第一次调查于术后第一天进行，随后在第7天、第30天和第90天进行。这些回复被转换成一个指数分数，表示从0（死亡）到1（完全健康）的生活质量。结果：所有患者在第1天均出现疼痛/不适。第7、30、90天，分别为95%、45%、25%。第1、7、30、90天的指数得分中位数分别为0.778、0.840、0.984、1.00。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 医学-外科

CiteScore

3.30

自引率

8.70%

发文量

342

审稿时长

4-8 weeks

期刊介绍： Langenbeck''s Archives of Surgery aims to publish the best results in the field of clinical surgery and basic surgical research. The main focus is on providing the highest level of clinical research and clinically relevant basic research. The journal, published exclusively in English, will provide an international discussion forum for the controlled results of clinical surgery. The majority of published contributions will be original articles reporting on clinical data from general and visceral surgery, while endocrine surgery will also be covered. Papers on basic surgical principles from the fields of traumatology, vascular and thoracic surgery are also welcome. Evidence-based medicine is an important criterion for the acceptance of papers.