Targeted-Agent Continual Reassessment Method: A Novel Bayesian Enrichment Design for Phase I Trials of Molecularly Targeted Therapies.

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
JCO precision oncology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-23 DOI:10.1200/PO.24.00360
Clement Ma, David S Shulman, Hasan Al-Sayegh, Steven G DuBois, Wendy B London
{"title":"Targeted-Agent Continual Reassessment Method: A Novel Bayesian Enrichment Design for Phase I Trials of Molecularly Targeted Therapies.","authors":"Clement Ma, David S Shulman, Hasan Al-Sayegh, Steven G DuBois, Wendy B London","doi":"10.1200/PO.24.00360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Novel therapies targeting specific genomic alterations are a promising treatment approach for relapsed/refractory cancer. Patients with specific alterations may be more likely to respond. Trial designs should maximize opportunities for such patients to enroll on these trials. Existing designs do not enrich for patients with specific alterations. We developed the adaptive Targeted Agent-Continual Reassessment Method (TARGET-CRM) to optimize dose finding and enrich for patients with specific alterations, and applied it in a pediatric phase I trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were stratified to cohort A (unspecified tumors) or cohort B (rare genomic alterations). The TARGET-CRM design permits cohort B patients to immediately enroll at one dose level below the currently evaluated dose level instead of waiting for an open slot at the current dose level. Using simulations, we compared the operating characteristics (accuracy-the proportion of trials in which the true maximum tolerated dose [MTD] was identified/recommended; safety-the dose-limiting toxicity [DLT] rate; the proportion of cohort B patients enrolled) of the TARGET-CRM, standard CRM, and 3 + 3 designs across various scenarios.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The proportion of enrolled patients who were cohort B was higher for TARGET-CRM (90%-100%) compared with CRM (approximately 85%) and 3 + 3 (approximately 79%). The DLT rate and rate the true MTD was recommended were similar for TARGET-CRM and CRM, differing by only 0%-4% and 0%-4%, respectively. Results were similar regardless of trial sample size and proportion of cohort B patients in the population.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In phase I dose-finding trials of targeted agents, the Bayesian adaptive TARGET-CRM design maximizes enrollment of patients hypothesized as most likely to benefit from the targeted agent, while maintaining similar or superior accuracy and safety as the CRM and 3 + 3 designs.</p>","PeriodicalId":14797,"journal":{"name":"JCO precision oncology","volume":"8 ","pages":"e2400360"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11670905/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO precision oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/PO.24.00360","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Novel therapies targeting specific genomic alterations are a promising treatment approach for relapsed/refractory cancer. Patients with specific alterations may be more likely to respond. Trial designs should maximize opportunities for such patients to enroll on these trials. Existing designs do not enrich for patients with specific alterations. We developed the adaptive Targeted Agent-Continual Reassessment Method (TARGET-CRM) to optimize dose finding and enrich for patients with specific alterations, and applied it in a pediatric phase I trial.

Methods: Patients were stratified to cohort A (unspecified tumors) or cohort B (rare genomic alterations). The TARGET-CRM design permits cohort B patients to immediately enroll at one dose level below the currently evaluated dose level instead of waiting for an open slot at the current dose level. Using simulations, we compared the operating characteristics (accuracy-the proportion of trials in which the true maximum tolerated dose [MTD] was identified/recommended; safety-the dose-limiting toxicity [DLT] rate; the proportion of cohort B patients enrolled) of the TARGET-CRM, standard CRM, and 3 + 3 designs across various scenarios.

Results: The proportion of enrolled patients who were cohort B was higher for TARGET-CRM (90%-100%) compared with CRM (approximately 85%) and 3 + 3 (approximately 79%). The DLT rate and rate the true MTD was recommended were similar for TARGET-CRM and CRM, differing by only 0%-4% and 0%-4%, respectively. Results were similar regardless of trial sample size and proportion of cohort B patients in the population.

Conclusion: In phase I dose-finding trials of targeted agents, the Bayesian adaptive TARGET-CRM design maximizes enrollment of patients hypothesized as most likely to benefit from the targeted agent, while maintaining similar or superior accuracy and safety as the CRM and 3 + 3 designs.

靶向药物持续重评估方法:一种用于分子靶向治疗I期试验的新型贝叶斯富集设计。
目的:针对特定基因组改变的新疗法是治疗复发/难治性癌症的一种有希望的治疗方法。有特定改变的患者可能更有可能有反应。试验设计应使这类患者参加试验的机会最大化。现有的设计不能满足患者的特殊需求。我们开发了适应性靶向药物持续重新评估方法(TARGET-CRM),以优化剂量发现并丰富特定改变的患者,并将其应用于儿科I期试验。方法:将患者分为A组(未指明的肿瘤)和B组(罕见的基因组改变)。TARGET-CRM设计允许队列B患者在低于当前评估剂量水平的剂量水平下立即入组,而不是等待当前剂量水平的开放时段。通过模拟,我们比较了操作特性(准确性-确定/推荐真实最大耐受剂量[MTD]的试验比例;安全性——剂量限制毒性率;TARGET-CRM、标准CRM和3 + 3设计在不同情况下的入选B队列患者比例。结果:TARGET-CRM组B组入组患者比例(90%-100%)高于CRM组(约85%)和3 + 3组(约79%)。TARGET-CRM和CRM的DLT率和推荐的真实MTD率相似,分别仅相差0%-4%和0%-4%。无论试验样本量和B队列患者在人群中的比例如何,结果都是相似的。结论:在靶向药物的I期剂量寻找试验中,贝叶斯自适应TARGET-CRM设计最大限度地增加了假设最有可能从靶向药物中获益的患者的入组,同时保持了与CRM和3 + 3设计相似或更高的准确性和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
363
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信