{"title":"Effectiveness of the repeated 3-time-balloon-inflation method in reducing coronary stent edge dissection.","authors":"Ryosuke Amisaki, Tomomi Watanabe, Satoshi Kobara, Kazuhiro Yamamoto","doi":"10.1007/s00380-024-02510-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The optimal procedural protocol for coronary stent deployment remains undetermined. Post-dilation with a high-pressure balloon is often performed to optimize the stent expansion. However, high-pressure dilation also carries the potential risk of coronary artery injury. A previous in vitro study reported that multiple-times balloon inflation at the same pressure resulted in better stent expansion compared to one-time balloon inflation. In our facility, we frequently perform the repeated 3-time-balloon-inflation method, wherein the stent delivery balloon was inflated 3 times at nominal pressure to deploy the stent, to improve stent expansion without high-pressure balloon inflation. Although this method seems effective in avoiding excessive high-pressure dilation, its clinical data are insufficient. In this study, we investigated the clinical outcomes of the repeated 3-time-balloon-inflation method. This retrospective study included 370 patients with 467 stented coronary lesions. These subjects were divided into two groups: one with standard balloon inflation and the other with repeated 3-time balloon inflation, and treatment outcomes were compared. The repeated 3-time-balloon-inflation group had 254 lesions, and the standard-balloon-inflation group had 213 lesions. Stent edge dissection occurred in 6 lesions (2.8%) in the standard-balloon-inflation group, whereas did not occur in the repeated 3-time-balloon-inflation group. A statistically significant difference remained even after propensity score matching (p = 0.040). The final minimum stent area and long-term clinical outcomes were not significantly different between the two groups. The repeated 3-time-balloon-inflation method may reduce stent edge dissection while demonstrating comparable minimal stent area and long-term outcomes to the standard-balloon-inflation method.</p>","PeriodicalId":12940,"journal":{"name":"Heart and Vessels","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart and Vessels","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-024-02510-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The optimal procedural protocol for coronary stent deployment remains undetermined. Post-dilation with a high-pressure balloon is often performed to optimize the stent expansion. However, high-pressure dilation also carries the potential risk of coronary artery injury. A previous in vitro study reported that multiple-times balloon inflation at the same pressure resulted in better stent expansion compared to one-time balloon inflation. In our facility, we frequently perform the repeated 3-time-balloon-inflation method, wherein the stent delivery balloon was inflated 3 times at nominal pressure to deploy the stent, to improve stent expansion without high-pressure balloon inflation. Although this method seems effective in avoiding excessive high-pressure dilation, its clinical data are insufficient. In this study, we investigated the clinical outcomes of the repeated 3-time-balloon-inflation method. This retrospective study included 370 patients with 467 stented coronary lesions. These subjects were divided into two groups: one with standard balloon inflation and the other with repeated 3-time balloon inflation, and treatment outcomes were compared. The repeated 3-time-balloon-inflation group had 254 lesions, and the standard-balloon-inflation group had 213 lesions. Stent edge dissection occurred in 6 lesions (2.8%) in the standard-balloon-inflation group, whereas did not occur in the repeated 3-time-balloon-inflation group. A statistically significant difference remained even after propensity score matching (p = 0.040). The final minimum stent area and long-term clinical outcomes were not significantly different between the two groups. The repeated 3-time-balloon-inflation method may reduce stent edge dissection while demonstrating comparable minimal stent area and long-term outcomes to the standard-balloon-inflation method.
期刊介绍:
Heart and Vessels is an English-language journal that provides a forum of original ideas, excellent methods, and fascinating techniques on cardiovascular disease fields. All papers submitted for publication are evaluated only with regard to scientific quality and relevance to the heart and vessels. Contributions from those engaged in practical medicine, as well as from those involved in basic research, are welcomed.