Musculoskeletal Disorders Among Surgeons and Attitudes Towards Wearable Devices for Ergonomic Optimization.

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Lauren C LaMonica, Mark W Farha, Connor R Mullen, Tasha M Hughes, Jeffrey H Kozlow, Kristin L Chrouser
{"title":"Musculoskeletal Disorders Among Surgeons and Attitudes Towards Wearable Devices for Ergonomic Optimization.","authors":"Lauren C LaMonica, Mark W Farha, Connor R Mullen, Tasha M Hughes, Jeffrey H Kozlow, Kristin L Chrouser","doi":"10.1097/SLA.0000000000006617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the burden of ergonomic strain and to examine factors influencing intention to use wearable technology that may improve ergonomics during surgery.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgical ergonomic strain leads to high rates of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) and pain, contributing to early surgeon retirement and an epidemic of burnout.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey of surgeons at a single institution was conducted using two validated instruments, the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire and Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT2), assessing musculoskeletal strain and facilitators of wearable sensor use, respectively. Additional survey items examined preferred ergonomic device features. Partial least squares structural equation modeling tested model validity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>161 participants completed the entire survey. Most respondents were male (63.4%) and were more likely to be from General Surgery (26.1%) than from other subspecialties. The majority of surgeons had never received prior ergonomic training (n=107, 72.3%). Twenty surgeons (14.1%) required hospitalization and 31 (21.8%) surgeons changed operating responsibilities due to musculoskeletal injury with 77 (59.1%) reporting an impact of ergonomic pain on their ability to work as a surgeon. Perceived efficacy (β=0.190, P=0.005), social influence (β=0.135, P=0.039), hedonic motivation (β=0.274, P<0.001), and innovativeness (β=0.243, P<0.001) were significantly associated with behavioral intention to use a wearable ergonomic device. The waist (n=36, 24.3%), followed by the neck/upper back (n=29, 19.6%), were the most preferred sensor locations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Surgeons report a high burden of MSDs impacting their ability to work. Wearable sensors that provide feedback on ergonomic strain represent an opportunity to reduce MSDs among surgeons.</p>","PeriodicalId":8017,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000006617","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the burden of ergonomic strain and to examine factors influencing intention to use wearable technology that may improve ergonomics during surgery.

Background: Surgical ergonomic strain leads to high rates of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) and pain, contributing to early surgeon retirement and an epidemic of burnout.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey of surgeons at a single institution was conducted using two validated instruments, the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire and Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT2), assessing musculoskeletal strain and facilitators of wearable sensor use, respectively. Additional survey items examined preferred ergonomic device features. Partial least squares structural equation modeling tested model validity.

Results: 161 participants completed the entire survey. Most respondents were male (63.4%) and were more likely to be from General Surgery (26.1%) than from other subspecialties. The majority of surgeons had never received prior ergonomic training (n=107, 72.3%). Twenty surgeons (14.1%) required hospitalization and 31 (21.8%) surgeons changed operating responsibilities due to musculoskeletal injury with 77 (59.1%) reporting an impact of ergonomic pain on their ability to work as a surgeon. Perceived efficacy (β=0.190, P=0.005), social influence (β=0.135, P=0.039), hedonic motivation (β=0.274, P<0.001), and innovativeness (β=0.243, P<0.001) were significantly associated with behavioral intention to use a wearable ergonomic device. The waist (n=36, 24.3%), followed by the neck/upper back (n=29, 19.6%), were the most preferred sensor locations.

Conclusions: Surgeons report a high burden of MSDs impacting their ability to work. Wearable sensors that provide feedback on ergonomic strain represent an opportunity to reduce MSDs among surgeons.

外科医生的肌肉骨骼疾病和对人体工程学优化可穿戴设备的态度。
目的:评估手术过程中人体工效负荷,探讨影响可穿戴技术应用意向的因素,以改善手术过程中的人体工效。背景:手术人体工程学劳损导致与工作相关的肌肉骨骼疾病(MSDs)和疼痛的高发率,导致外科医生提前退休和职业倦怠的流行。方法:采用北欧肌肉骨骼问卷和统一技术接受与使用理论(UTAUT2)这两种经过验证的工具,对一家机构的外科医生进行横断面调查,分别评估肌肉骨骼应变和可穿戴传感器使用的促进因素。额外的调查项目检查了首选的符合人体工程学的设备功能。偏最小二乘结构方程模型检验了模型的有效性。结果:161名参与者完成了整个调查。大多数受访者为男性(63.4%),来自普通外科(26.1%)的可能性高于其他专科。大多数外科医生从未接受过人体工程学培训(n=107, 72.3%)。20名外科医生(14.1%)需要住院治疗,31名外科医生(21.8%)由于肌肉骨骼损伤而改变了手术职责,77名外科医生(59.1%)报告了人体工程学疼痛对他们作为外科医生工作能力的影响。感知疗效(β=0.190, P=0.005),社会影响(β=0.135, P=0.039),享乐动机(β=0.274),结论:外科医生报告msd的高负担影响了他们的工作能力。可穿戴传感器提供符合人体工程学的应变反馈,为外科医生减少msd提供了机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of surgery
Annals of surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
4.40%
发文量
687
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgery is a renowned surgery journal, recognized globally for its extensive scholarly references. It serves as a valuable resource for the international medical community by disseminating knowledge regarding important developments in surgical science and practice. Surgeons regularly turn to the Annals of Surgery to stay updated on innovative practices and techniques. The journal also offers special editorial features such as "Advances in Surgical Technique," offering timely coverage of ongoing clinical issues. Additionally, the journal publishes monthly review articles that address the latest concerns in surgical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信