Robotic companionship for solo diners: the role of robotic service type, need to belong and restaurant type

IF 9.1 1区 管理学 Q1 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM
Jingwen (Daisy) Huang, IpKin Anthony Wong, Qi Lilith Lian, Huiling Huang
{"title":"Robotic companionship for solo diners: the role of robotic service type, need to belong and restaurant type","authors":"Jingwen (Daisy) Huang, IpKin Anthony Wong, Qi Lilith Lian, Huiling Huang","doi":"10.1108/ijchm-05-2024-0654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>What kind of robotic service do customers prefer when they dine out alone? This study aims to investigate how robotic service type affects solo diners’ attitude toward robotic service and restaurant revisit intention, through the mediation of rapport. It also examines the moderating effects of the need to belong and restaurant type.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>Three experiments were conducted. Study 1 used a one-factor between-subjects design to test the effect of robotic service type on rapport and solo diners’ responses. Study 2 conducted a 2 (robotic service type: service-delivery vs entertainment) × need to belong quasi-experimental design to examine the moderation of need to belong. Study 3 used a 2 (robotic service type: service-delivery vs entertainment) × 2 (restaurant type: traditional restaurant vs solo-friendly restaurant) factorial between-subjects design to test the moderation of restaurant type. A qualitative study (Study 4) complements the experimental results based on semistructured interviews.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>Entertainment (vs service-delivery) robotic service has a stronger effect on solo diners’ responses, with rapport serving as a mediator. Additionally, solo diners with a heightened need to belong demonstrate an intensified rapport effect when receiving entertainment-oriented robotic service. Furthermore, restaurant type plays a moderating role between robotic service type and consumer responses. For traditional restaurants, solo diners who receive entertainment (vs service-delivery) robotic service tend to form stronger rapport and favorable responses. The results of the qualitative study elucidate and support the hypothesized relationships of the experimental studies.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>Restaurant operators could consider offering entertainment-based smart devices that allow solo diners to indulge themselves during the dining encounter. Restaurants could also design environmental cues that can signify a sense of comfort, such as redesigning tables with individual seats for solo diners to enhance their perceptions of shared characteristics among other solo diners in the same space.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This research advances the literature on solo dining and robotic service, by investigating how human–robot interaction can fulfill solo diners’ relatedness goals, as self-determination theory suggests. This inquiry also represents an early attempt in the hospitality literature to empirically examine the influence of robotic service type on consumer responses through the mediation of rapport.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":13744,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijchm-05-2024-0654","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

What kind of robotic service do customers prefer when they dine out alone? This study aims to investigate how robotic service type affects solo diners’ attitude toward robotic service and restaurant revisit intention, through the mediation of rapport. It also examines the moderating effects of the need to belong and restaurant type.

Design/methodology/approach

Three experiments were conducted. Study 1 used a one-factor between-subjects design to test the effect of robotic service type on rapport and solo diners’ responses. Study 2 conducted a 2 (robotic service type: service-delivery vs entertainment) × need to belong quasi-experimental design to examine the moderation of need to belong. Study 3 used a 2 (robotic service type: service-delivery vs entertainment) × 2 (restaurant type: traditional restaurant vs solo-friendly restaurant) factorial between-subjects design to test the moderation of restaurant type. A qualitative study (Study 4) complements the experimental results based on semistructured interviews.

Findings

Entertainment (vs service-delivery) robotic service has a stronger effect on solo diners’ responses, with rapport serving as a mediator. Additionally, solo diners with a heightened need to belong demonstrate an intensified rapport effect when receiving entertainment-oriented robotic service. Furthermore, restaurant type plays a moderating role between robotic service type and consumer responses. For traditional restaurants, solo diners who receive entertainment (vs service-delivery) robotic service tend to form stronger rapport and favorable responses. The results of the qualitative study elucidate and support the hypothesized relationships of the experimental studies.

Practical implications

Restaurant operators could consider offering entertainment-based smart devices that allow solo diners to indulge themselves during the dining encounter. Restaurants could also design environmental cues that can signify a sense of comfort, such as redesigning tables with individual seats for solo diners to enhance their perceptions of shared characteristics among other solo diners in the same space.

Originality/value

This research advances the literature on solo dining and robotic service, by investigating how human–robot interaction can fulfill solo diners’ relatedness goals, as self-determination theory suggests. This inquiry also represents an early attempt in the hospitality literature to empirically examine the influence of robotic service type on consumer responses through the mediation of rapport.

独自用餐者的机器人陪伴:机器人服务类型的角色,需要归属和餐厅类型
当顾客独自外出就餐时,他们更喜欢哪种机器人服务?本研究旨在探讨机器人服务类型如何影响独自用餐者对机器人服务的态度和餐厅再访意向,并以融洽关系为中介。它还检验了归属需求和餐厅类型的调节作用。设计/方法/方法进行了三个实验。研究1采用单因素受试者间设计来测试机器人服务类型对融洽关系和单独用餐者反应的影响。研究2进行了一个2(机器人服务类型:服务交付vs娱乐)×归属需要的准实验设计来检验归属需要的适度性。研究3采用2(机器人服务类型:服务提供vs娱乐)× 2(餐厅类型:传统餐厅vs单人餐厅)受试者间因子设计来测试餐厅类型的中介性。一项定性研究(研究4)补充了基于半结构化访谈的实验结果。研究发现,娱乐(与服务交付相比)机器人服务对独自用餐者的反应有更大的影响,融洽的关系是一个中介。此外,当接受以娱乐为导向的机器人服务时,有强烈归属感的独自用餐者会表现出更强的融洽效应。此外,餐厅类型在机器人服务类型和消费者反应之间起调节作用。对于传统餐馆来说,接受娱乐(相对于服务交付)机器人服务的独自用餐者往往会形成更强的融洽关系和良好的反应。定性研究的结果阐明并支持了实验研究的假设关系。实际意义餐馆经营者可以考虑提供基于娱乐的智能设备,让独自用餐的人在用餐时放纵自己。餐厅还可以设计环境线索,以表示一种舒适感,例如为单独用餐者重新设计带有单独座位的桌子,以增强他们对同一空间中其他单独用餐者的共同特征的感知。原创性/价值本研究通过研究人机交互如何实现自主理论所建议的独自用餐者的关系目标,推进了关于独自用餐和机器人服务的文献。这项调查也代表了酒店文献的早期尝试,通过融洽的调解,实证研究机器人服务类型对消费者反应的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.90
自引率
31.50%
发文量
239
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management serves as a conduit for disseminating the latest developments and innovative insights into the management of hospitality and tourism businesses globally. The journal publishes peer-reviewed papers that comprehensively address issues pertinent to strategic management, operations, marketing, finance, and HR management in the field of hospitality and tourism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信