Investigation of cardiac substructure automatic segmentation methods on synthetically generated 4D cone-beam CT images

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Medical physics Pub Date : 2024-12-23 DOI:10.1002/mp.17596
Mark Gardner, Robert N. Finnegan, Owen Dillon, Vicky Chin, Tess Reynolds, Paul J. Keall
{"title":"Investigation of cardiac substructure automatic segmentation methods on synthetically generated 4D cone-beam CT images","authors":"Mark Gardner,&nbsp;Robert N. Finnegan,&nbsp;Owen Dillon,&nbsp;Vicky Chin,&nbsp;Tess Reynolds,&nbsp;Paul J. Keall","doi":"10.1002/mp.17596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>STereotactic Arrhythmia Radioablation (STAR) is a novel noninvasive method for treating arrythmias in which external beam radiation is directed towards subregions of the heart. Challenges for accurate STAR targeting include small target volumes and relatively large patient motion, which can lead to radiation related patient toxicities. 4D Cone-beam CT (CBCT) images are used for stereotactic lung treatments to account for respiration-related patient motion. 4D-CBCT imaging could similarly be used to account for respiration-related patient motion in STAR; however, the poor contrast of heart tissue in CBCT makes identifying cardiac substructures in 4D-CBCT images challenging. If cardiac structures can be identified in pre-treatment 4D-CBCT images, then the location of the target volume can be more accurately identified for different phases of the respiration cycle, leading to more accurate targeting and a reduction in patient toxicities.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>The aim of this simulation study is to investigate the accuracy of different cardiac substructure segmentation methods for 4D-CBCT images.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Repeat 4D-CT scans from 13 lung cancer patients were obtained from The Cancer Imaging Archive. Synthetic 4D-CBCT images for each patient were simulated by forward projecting and reconstructing each respiration phase of a chosen “testing” 4D-CT scan. Eighteen cardiac structures were segmented from each respiration phase image in the testing 4D-CT using the previously validated <i>platipy</i> toolkit. The <i>platipy</i> segmentations from the testing 4D-CT were defined as the ground truth segmentations for the synthetic 4D-CBCT images. Five different 4D-CBCT cardiac segmentation methods were investigated: 3D Rigid Alignment, 4D Rigid Alignment, Direct CBCT Segmentation, Contour Transformation, and Synthetic CT Segmentation methods. For all methods except the Direct CBCT segmentation method, a separate 4D-CT (Planning CT) was used to assist in generating 4D-CBCT segmentations. Segmentation performance was measured using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), Hausdorff distance (HD), mean surface distance (MSD), and volume ratio (VR) metrics.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The mean ± standard deviation DSC for all cardiac substructures for the 3D Rigid Alignment, 4D Rigid Alignment, Direct CBCT Segmentation, Contour Transformation, and Synthetic CT Segmentation methods were 0.48 ± 0.29, 0.52 ± 0.29, 0.37 ± 0.32, 0.53 ± 0.29, 0.57 ± 0.28, respectively. Similarly, the HD values were 10.9 ± 3.6 , 9.9 ± 2.6 , 17.3 ± 5.3 , 9.9 ± 2.8 , 9.3 ± 3.0 mm, the MSD values were 2.9 ± 0.6 , 2.9 ± 0.6 , 6.3 ± 2.5 , 2.5 ± 0.6 , 2.4 ± 0.8 mm, and the VR Values were 0.81 ± 0.12, 0.78 ± 0.14, 1.10 ± 0.47, 0.72 ± 0.15, 0.98 ± 0.44, respectively. Of the five methods investigated the Synthetic CT segmentation method generated the most accurate segmentations for all calculated segmentation metrics.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This simulation study investigates the accuracy of different cardiac substructure segmentation methods for 4D-CBCT images. Accurate 4D-CBCT cardiac segmentation will provide more accurate information on the location of cardiac anatomy during STAR treatments which can lead to safer and more effective STAR. As the data and segmentation methods used in this study are all open source, this study provides a useful benchmarking tool to evaluate other CBCT cardiac segmentation methods.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18384,"journal":{"name":"Medical physics","volume":"52 4","pages":"2224-2237"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mp.17596","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

STereotactic Arrhythmia Radioablation (STAR) is a novel noninvasive method for treating arrythmias in which external beam radiation is directed towards subregions of the heart. Challenges for accurate STAR targeting include small target volumes and relatively large patient motion, which can lead to radiation related patient toxicities. 4D Cone-beam CT (CBCT) images are used for stereotactic lung treatments to account for respiration-related patient motion. 4D-CBCT imaging could similarly be used to account for respiration-related patient motion in STAR; however, the poor contrast of heart tissue in CBCT makes identifying cardiac substructures in 4D-CBCT images challenging. If cardiac structures can be identified in pre-treatment 4D-CBCT images, then the location of the target volume can be more accurately identified for different phases of the respiration cycle, leading to more accurate targeting and a reduction in patient toxicities.

Purpose

The aim of this simulation study is to investigate the accuracy of different cardiac substructure segmentation methods for 4D-CBCT images.

Methods

Repeat 4D-CT scans from 13 lung cancer patients were obtained from The Cancer Imaging Archive. Synthetic 4D-CBCT images for each patient were simulated by forward projecting and reconstructing each respiration phase of a chosen “testing” 4D-CT scan. Eighteen cardiac structures were segmented from each respiration phase image in the testing 4D-CT using the previously validated platipy toolkit. The platipy segmentations from the testing 4D-CT were defined as the ground truth segmentations for the synthetic 4D-CBCT images. Five different 4D-CBCT cardiac segmentation methods were investigated: 3D Rigid Alignment, 4D Rigid Alignment, Direct CBCT Segmentation, Contour Transformation, and Synthetic CT Segmentation methods. For all methods except the Direct CBCT segmentation method, a separate 4D-CT (Planning CT) was used to assist in generating 4D-CBCT segmentations. Segmentation performance was measured using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), Hausdorff distance (HD), mean surface distance (MSD), and volume ratio (VR) metrics.

Results

The mean ± standard deviation DSC for all cardiac substructures for the 3D Rigid Alignment, 4D Rigid Alignment, Direct CBCT Segmentation, Contour Transformation, and Synthetic CT Segmentation methods were 0.48 ± 0.29, 0.52 ± 0.29, 0.37 ± 0.32, 0.53 ± 0.29, 0.57 ± 0.28, respectively. Similarly, the HD values were 10.9 ± 3.6 , 9.9 ± 2.6 , 17.3 ± 5.3 , 9.9 ± 2.8 , 9.3 ± 3.0 mm, the MSD values were 2.9 ± 0.6 , 2.9 ± 0.6 , 6.3 ± 2.5 , 2.5 ± 0.6 , 2.4 ± 0.8 mm, and the VR Values were 0.81 ± 0.12, 0.78 ± 0.14, 1.10 ± 0.47, 0.72 ± 0.15, 0.98 ± 0.44, respectively. Of the five methods investigated the Synthetic CT segmentation method generated the most accurate segmentations for all calculated segmentation metrics.

Conclusion

This simulation study investigates the accuracy of different cardiac substructure segmentation methods for 4D-CBCT images. Accurate 4D-CBCT cardiac segmentation will provide more accurate information on the location of cardiac anatomy during STAR treatments which can lead to safer and more effective STAR. As the data and segmentation methods used in this study are all open source, this study provides a useful benchmarking tool to evaluate other CBCT cardiac segmentation methods.

合成四维锥束CT图像心脏亚结构自动分割方法研究。
背景:立体定向心律失常放射消融术(STAR)是一种新的无创治疗心律失常的方法,其中外部束辐射直接指向心脏的亚区域。STAR精确定位的挑战包括靶体积小,患者运动相对较大,这可能导致与辐射相关的患者毒性。4D锥束CT (CBCT)图像用于立体定向肺治疗,以考虑呼吸相关的患者运动。4D-CBCT成像同样可以用于解释STAR中与呼吸相关的患者运动;然而,CBCT对心脏组织的对比度较差,使得在4D-CBCT图像中识别心脏亚结构具有挑战性。如果可以在预处理4D-CBCT图像中识别心脏结构,则可以更准确地识别呼吸周期不同阶段的靶体积位置,从而更准确地定位并减少患者毒性。目的:研究4D-CBCT图像中不同心脏亚结构分割方法的准确性。方法:从癌症影像档案中获取13例肺癌患者的重复4D-CT扫描。通过正向投影和重建所选“测试”4D-CT扫描的每个呼吸阶段,模拟每位患者的合成4D-CBCT图像。使用先前验证的platipy工具包,从测试4D-CT的每个呼吸期图像中分割出18个心脏结构。将测试4D-CT的platipy分割定义为合成4D-CBCT图像的ground truth分割。研究了5种不同的4D-CBCT心脏分割方法:3D刚性对齐法、4D刚性对齐法、直接CBCT分割法、轮廓变换法和合成CT分割法。除了直接CBCT分割方法外,所有方法都使用单独的4D-CT (Planning CT)来辅助生成4D-CBCT分割。使用Dice相似系数(DSC)、Hausdorff距离(HD)、平均表面距离(MSD)和体积比(VR)指标来衡量分割性能。结果:三维刚性对齐、四维刚性对齐、直接CBCT分割、轮廓变换和合成CT分割方法的心脏亚结构DSC均值±标准差分别为0.48±0.29、0.52±0.29、0.37±0.32、0.53±0.29、0.57±0.28。同样,HD值分别为10.9±3.6,9.9±2.6,17.3±5.3,9.9±2.8,9.3±3.0毫米,MSD值分别为2.9±0.6、2.9±0.6、6.3±2.5、2.5±0.6、2.4±0.8毫米,和VR值分别为0.81±0.12、0.78±0.14、1.10±0.47、0.72±0.15、0.98±0.44,分别。在所研究的五种方法中,合成CT分割方法对所有计算的分割度量产生了最准确的分割。结论:本仿真研究探讨了4D-CBCT图像中不同心脏亚结构分割方法的准确性。准确的4D-CBCT心脏分割将在STAR治疗过程中提供更准确的心脏解剖位置信息,从而实现更安全、更有效的STAR治疗。由于本研究使用的数据和分割方法都是开源的,因此本研究为评估其他CBCT心脏分割方法提供了一个有用的基准工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical physics
Medical physics 医学-核医学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
15.80%
发文量
660
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Medical Physics publishes original, high impact physics, imaging science, and engineering research that advances patient diagnosis and therapy through contributions in 1) Basic science developments with high potential for clinical translation 2) Clinical applications of cutting edge engineering and physics innovations 3) Broadly applicable and innovative clinical physics developments Medical Physics is a journal of global scope and reach. By publishing in Medical Physics your research will reach an international, multidisciplinary audience including practicing medical physicists as well as physics- and engineering based translational scientists. We work closely with authors of promising articles to improve their quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信