Preliminary evidence that self-incentives uniquely promote smoking cessation in incarcerated populations: A pilot randomized controlled trial

0 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Emma M. Brown , Debbie M. Smith , Christopher J. Armitage
{"title":"Preliminary evidence that self-incentives uniquely promote smoking cessation in incarcerated populations: A pilot randomized controlled trial","authors":"Emma M. Brown ,&nbsp;Debbie M. Smith ,&nbsp;Christopher J. Armitage","doi":"10.1016/j.josat.2024.209610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Smoking prevalence rates in prison are typically four times higher than the rates found within community-based settings, increasing premature mortality. Encouraging smokers to self-administer incentives contingent on abstinence (i.e., self-incentivize) are effective in community-based settings and have the potential to work in an incarcerated population. The present study aims to: gauge the feasibility of- and assess possible effects associated with- encouraging smokers to self-incentivize to increase smoking abstinence.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study recruited 25 smokers from a UK prison who were attending the prison-based stop smoking service. Participants were randomized to one of three conditions, either: (a) an active control, asked to form a plan to quit smoking (<em>n</em>=5); or to self-incentivize if they had not smoked at all by the end of (b) the week (<em>n</em>=7); or (c) the month (<em>n</em>=13). The study gave no specific options to participants in choosing a self-incentive for a number of reasons (e.g., to enable choice of a self-incentive of sufficient rewarding value within a restrictive setting). Participant eligibility included: (a) aged 18 years or over, (b) able to understand written English, (c) competent to provide informed consent, and (d) were tobacco smokers, smoking on a daily basis. Acceptance and completion assessed feasibility. Chi-square analysis assessed possible effect of the intervention.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twenty five out of 27 smokers who were approached, welcomed the opportunity of further support and completed the baseline questionnaire. At 3-month follow-up, no participants (0/5) in the control condition abstained from smoking. In contrast, three (out of seven, d=1.12) participants who self-incentivized on a weekly basis abstained, and five (out of 13, d=0.83) participants who self-incentivized on a monthly basis abstained at the 3-month follow-up time point. Abstaining is defined as no cigarette smoked within at least the last 28-days via self-report and supported by biochemical verification from a sub-sample of participants (68%; 17/25).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Use of self-incentives alongside behavioral support and cessation medication is feasible and can be delivered at low-cost. Furthermore, the promise seen in this trial suggests a fully powered randomized controlled trial has the potential to increase smoking abstinence in an incarcerated population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73960,"journal":{"name":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","volume":"170 ","pages":"Article 209610"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949875924003229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Smoking prevalence rates in prison are typically four times higher than the rates found within community-based settings, increasing premature mortality. Encouraging smokers to self-administer incentives contingent on abstinence (i.e., self-incentivize) are effective in community-based settings and have the potential to work in an incarcerated population. The present study aims to: gauge the feasibility of- and assess possible effects associated with- encouraging smokers to self-incentivize to increase smoking abstinence.

Methods

The study recruited 25 smokers from a UK prison who were attending the prison-based stop smoking service. Participants were randomized to one of three conditions, either: (a) an active control, asked to form a plan to quit smoking (n=5); or to self-incentivize if they had not smoked at all by the end of (b) the week (n=7); or (c) the month (n=13). The study gave no specific options to participants in choosing a self-incentive for a number of reasons (e.g., to enable choice of a self-incentive of sufficient rewarding value within a restrictive setting). Participant eligibility included: (a) aged 18 years or over, (b) able to understand written English, (c) competent to provide informed consent, and (d) were tobacco smokers, smoking on a daily basis. Acceptance and completion assessed feasibility. Chi-square analysis assessed possible effect of the intervention.

Results

Twenty five out of 27 smokers who were approached, welcomed the opportunity of further support and completed the baseline questionnaire. At 3-month follow-up, no participants (0/5) in the control condition abstained from smoking. In contrast, three (out of seven, d=1.12) participants who self-incentivized on a weekly basis abstained, and five (out of 13, d=0.83) participants who self-incentivized on a monthly basis abstained at the 3-month follow-up time point. Abstaining is defined as no cigarette smoked within at least the last 28-days via self-report and supported by biochemical verification from a sub-sample of participants (68%; 17/25).

Conclusions

Use of self-incentives alongside behavioral support and cessation medication is feasible and can be delivered at low-cost. Furthermore, the promise seen in this trial suggests a fully powered randomized controlled trial has the potential to increase smoking abstinence in an incarcerated population.
初步证据表明,自我激励独特地促进了被监禁人群的戒烟:一项随机对照试验。
导言:监狱中的吸烟率通常比社区环境中的吸烟率高出四倍,增加了过早死亡率。鼓励吸烟者自我实施基于戒烟的激励措施(即自我激励)在社区环境中是有效的,并有可能在监禁人群中发挥作用。本研究旨在评估鼓励吸烟者自我激励增加戒烟的可行性,并评估其可能产生的影响。方法:研究从英国监狱招募了25名参加监狱戒烟服务的吸烟者。参与者被随机分配到三种情况中的一种,:(a)主动控制,被要求制定戒烟计划(n = 5);或者,如果他们在(b)周结束时完全没有吸烟,就自我激励(n = 7);或(c)月份(n = 13)。由于一些原因(例如,为了在限制性设置中选择具有足够奖励价值的自我激励),该研究没有给参与者选择自我激励的具体选项。参与者的资格包括:(a)年龄在18岁 或以上,(b)能够理解书面英语,(c)有能力提供知情同意,以及(d)是吸烟者,每天吸烟。验收和竣工评估可行性。卡方分析评估了干预的可能效果。结果:27名吸烟者中有25人接受了进一步的支持,并完成了基线问卷。随访3个月,对照组无戒烟者(0/5)。相比之下,每周自我激励的参与者中有3人(7人中d = 1.12)弃权,每月自我激励的参与者中有5人(d = 0.83)在3个月的随访时间点弃权。戒烟被定义为至少在过去28天内没有吸烟,通过自我报告,并得到参与者子样本的生化验证(68% %;17/25)。结论:使用自我激励与行为支持和戒烟药物是可行的,并且可以以低成本提供。此外,在这项试验中看到的希望表明,一项完全有力的随机对照试验有可能增加监禁人群的戒烟率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of substance use and addiction treatment
Journal of substance use and addiction treatment Biological Psychiatry, Neuroscience (General), Psychiatry and Mental Health, Psychology (General)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信