Early Palliative Care Following Aborted Cancer Surgery: Results of a Prospective Feasibility Trial.

Jordan M Cloyd, Rakhsha Khatri, Angela Sarna, Lena Stevens, Victor Heh, Mary Dillhoff, Alex Kim, Timothy M Pawlik, Aslam Ejaz, Sharla Wells-Di Gregorio, Erin Scott, Sachin S Kale
{"title":"Early Palliative Care Following Aborted Cancer Surgery: Results of a Prospective Feasibility Trial.","authors":"Jordan M Cloyd, Rakhsha Khatri, Angela Sarna, Lena Stevens, Victor Heh, Mary Dillhoff, Alex Kim, Timothy M Pawlik, Aslam Ejaz, Sharla Wells-Di Gregorio, Erin Scott, Sachin S Kale","doi":"10.1097/AS9.0000000000000520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although resection is generally necessary for curative-intent treatment of most solid organ cancers, surgery is occasionally aborted due to intraoperative findings. Following aborted cancer surgery, patients have unique care needs that specialized palliative care (PC) providers may be best equipped to manage. We hypothesized that early ambulatory PC referral following aborted cancer surgery would be feasible and acceptable.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-institution prospective clinical trial enrolled adult patients with gastrointestinal or hepatopancreatobiliary cancer with no prior PC exposure who had curative-intent oncologic surgery that was unexpectedly aborted. The primary endpoint was the completion of an ambulatory PC consultation within 30 days of enrollment. Secondary outcomes included changes in standardized measures of quality-of-life (QOL) and anxiety/depression during the 3-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 25 enrolled participants, the mean age was 65.3 ± 9.9 years, 68% were male, and 88% were White. The most common types of cancers were pancreatic (44%), hepatobiliary (20%), and colorectal (12%); reasons for aborting surgery were occult metastatic disease (52%) and local unresectability (36%). Only 13 of 25 (52%) met the primary endpoint of ambulatory PC within 30 days, less than the prespecified threshold of 70%. Overall, 16 (64%) patients completed ambulatory PC consultation a mean of 29.2 ± 15.8 days after enrollment. Of the 9 (36%) who did not, reasons included patient preference (n = 4), withdrawal from study (n = 1), lost to follow-up (n = 1), scheduling conflict (n = 1), and required inpatient PC before discharge (n = 2). Anxiety (4.94 ± 3.56 vs 3.35 ± 2.60, <i>P</i> = 0.06), depression (4.18 ± 4.02 vs 4.76 ± 3.44, <i>P</i> = 0.49), and QOL (82.44 ± 11.41 vs 82.03 ± 15.37, <i>P</i> = 0.92) scores did not significantly differ at 3-month follow-up compared to baseline.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Barriers to early ambulatory palliative care consultation exist after aborted cancer surgery. Given the unique and complex care needs of this patient population, additional research is needed to optimize supportive care strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":72231,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches","volume":"5 4","pages":"e520"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11661761/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AS9.0000000000000520","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although resection is generally necessary for curative-intent treatment of most solid organ cancers, surgery is occasionally aborted due to intraoperative findings. Following aborted cancer surgery, patients have unique care needs that specialized palliative care (PC) providers may be best equipped to manage. We hypothesized that early ambulatory PC referral following aborted cancer surgery would be feasible and acceptable.

Methods: This single-institution prospective clinical trial enrolled adult patients with gastrointestinal or hepatopancreatobiliary cancer with no prior PC exposure who had curative-intent oncologic surgery that was unexpectedly aborted. The primary endpoint was the completion of an ambulatory PC consultation within 30 days of enrollment. Secondary outcomes included changes in standardized measures of quality-of-life (QOL) and anxiety/depression during the 3-month follow-up.

Results: Among 25 enrolled participants, the mean age was 65.3 ± 9.9 years, 68% were male, and 88% were White. The most common types of cancers were pancreatic (44%), hepatobiliary (20%), and colorectal (12%); reasons for aborting surgery were occult metastatic disease (52%) and local unresectability (36%). Only 13 of 25 (52%) met the primary endpoint of ambulatory PC within 30 days, less than the prespecified threshold of 70%. Overall, 16 (64%) patients completed ambulatory PC consultation a mean of 29.2 ± 15.8 days after enrollment. Of the 9 (36%) who did not, reasons included patient preference (n = 4), withdrawal from study (n = 1), lost to follow-up (n = 1), scheduling conflict (n = 1), and required inpatient PC before discharge (n = 2). Anxiety (4.94 ± 3.56 vs 3.35 ± 2.60, P = 0.06), depression (4.18 ± 4.02 vs 4.76 ± 3.44, P = 0.49), and QOL (82.44 ± 11.41 vs 82.03 ± 15.37, P = 0.92) scores did not significantly differ at 3-month follow-up compared to baseline.

Conclusions: Barriers to early ambulatory palliative care consultation exist after aborted cancer surgery. Given the unique and complex care needs of this patient population, additional research is needed to optimize supportive care strategies.

Abstract Image

癌症手术流产后的早期姑息治疗:一项前瞻性可行性试验的结果。
背景:虽然对于大多数实体器官癌的治愈性治疗,切除通常是必要的,但手术有时会因术中发现而流产。在癌症手术流产后,患者有独特的护理需求,专门的姑息治疗(PC)提供者可能是最好的装备来管理。我们假设癌症手术流产后早期门诊PC转诊是可行和可接受的。方法:这项单机构前瞻性临床试验招募了胃肠道或肝胆管癌的成年患者,这些患者之前没有PC暴露,他们进行了治疗目的肿瘤手术,但意外流产。主要终点是在入组后30天内完成门诊PC会诊。次要结局包括3个月随访期间生活质量(QOL)和焦虑/抑郁的标准化测量的变化。结果:25名入组患者平均年龄65.3±9.9岁,68%为男性,88%为白人。最常见的癌症类型是胰腺癌(44%)、肝胆癌(20%)和结肠直肠癌(12%);手术流产的原因是隐匿性转移性疾病(52%)和局部不可切除(36%)。25人中只有13人(52%)在30天内达到了门诊PC的主要终点,低于预先设定的70%的阈值。总体而言,16例(64%)患者在入组后平均29.2±15.8天完成了门诊PC咨询。9(36%)没有,原因包括病人偏好(n = 4),退出研究(n = 1),失访(n = 1),调度冲突(n = 1),并要求住院电脑前放电(n = 2)。焦虑(4.94±3.56 vs 3.35±2.60,P = 0.06),抑郁(4.18±4.02 vs 4.76±3.44,P = 0.49),和生命质量(82.44±11.41 vs 82.03±15.37,P = 0.92)得分没有显著差异,三个月随访与基线相比。结论:癌症手术流产后早期门诊姑息治疗咨询存在障碍。鉴于这一患者群体独特而复杂的护理需求,需要进一步的研究来优化支持性护理策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信