Dhiren Kumar, Nihar Raju, Bekir Tanriover, Louiza Azzouz, Irfan Moinuddin, Mary Philogene, Layla Kamal, Felecia McDougan, Hugh Davis Massey, Selvaraj Muthusamy, Inkoo Lee, Philip Halloran, Gaurav Gupta
{"title":"Tissue-based Gene Expression Diagnosis of Mild and Moderate T-cell-mediated Rejection to Guide Therapy in Kidney Transplants.","authors":"Dhiren Kumar, Nihar Raju, Bekir Tanriover, Louiza Azzouz, Irfan Moinuddin, Mary Philogene, Layla Kamal, Felecia McDougan, Hugh Davis Massey, Selvaraj Muthusamy, Inkoo Lee, Philip Halloran, Gaurav Gupta","doi":"10.1097/TP.0000000000005296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mild histologic lesions of tubulo-interstitial inflammation could represent a \"response-to-wounding\" rather than allorecognition. Tissue gene expression may complement histopathology for T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) diagnostics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We report on the incorporation of tissue gene expression testing using a Molecular Microscope Diagnostic System into the management of kidney transplant biopsies with suspected TCMR. Patients (N = 209) were divided into 3 groups based upon diagnosis and TCMR therapy (with high-dose steroids and/or anti-thymocyte globulin): Group 1: Untreated histologic TCMR with molecular quiescence (H+M-); Group 2: Treated histologic and molecular TCMR (H+M+); and Group 3: Controls, with no histologic or molecular (H-M-) rejection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At biopsy, estimated glomerular filtration rate was worse ( P = 0.006) in H+M+ (N = 35; 33 ± 22 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ) and H+M- (N = 30; 40 ± 18 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ) groups; compared with H-M- (N = 144; 47 ± 24 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ) group. In H+M- biopsies, mean molecular acute kidney injury scores (0.33 versus 0.10; P = 0.03) were higher than in H-M-; while molecular TCMR was lower compared with H+M+ (0.04 versus 0.54; P < 0.001). At 12 m postbiopsy estimated glomerular filtration rate remained low ( P < 0.001) in H+M+ (38 ± 22 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ) but improved in untreated H+M- (44 ± 22 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ) and H-M- (50 ± 23 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ) groups. At a mean follow-up of 2.1 ± 1.2 y post-index biopsy, death-censored graft survival was lower in H+M+ (74%) than in H+M- (90%) and H-M- (92%; P = 0.001). H+M+ cases had numerically higher rejection on follow-up biopsy (20%) than H+M- (7%) ( P = 0.12) and de novo donor-specific antibody formation (H+M+ 24%; H+M- 10%; P = 0.13).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this large single-center study, biopsies with untreated histological TCMR and molecular quiescence had comparable clinical outcomes to cases with no rejection, whereas those with histologic and tissue gene expression confirmed TCMR had inferior outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":23316,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":"1402-1412"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000005296","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Mild histologic lesions of tubulo-interstitial inflammation could represent a "response-to-wounding" rather than allorecognition. Tissue gene expression may complement histopathology for T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) diagnostics.
Methods: We report on the incorporation of tissue gene expression testing using a Molecular Microscope Diagnostic System into the management of kidney transplant biopsies with suspected TCMR. Patients (N = 209) were divided into 3 groups based upon diagnosis and TCMR therapy (with high-dose steroids and/or anti-thymocyte globulin): Group 1: Untreated histologic TCMR with molecular quiescence (H+M-); Group 2: Treated histologic and molecular TCMR (H+M+); and Group 3: Controls, with no histologic or molecular (H-M-) rejection.
Results: At biopsy, estimated glomerular filtration rate was worse ( P = 0.006) in H+M+ (N = 35; 33 ± 22 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ) and H+M- (N = 30; 40 ± 18 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ) groups; compared with H-M- (N = 144; 47 ± 24 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ) group. In H+M- biopsies, mean molecular acute kidney injury scores (0.33 versus 0.10; P = 0.03) were higher than in H-M-; while molecular TCMR was lower compared with H+M+ (0.04 versus 0.54; P < 0.001). At 12 m postbiopsy estimated glomerular filtration rate remained low ( P < 0.001) in H+M+ (38 ± 22 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ) but improved in untreated H+M- (44 ± 22 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ) and H-M- (50 ± 23 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ) groups. At a mean follow-up of 2.1 ± 1.2 y post-index biopsy, death-censored graft survival was lower in H+M+ (74%) than in H+M- (90%) and H-M- (92%; P = 0.001). H+M+ cases had numerically higher rejection on follow-up biopsy (20%) than H+M- (7%) ( P = 0.12) and de novo donor-specific antibody formation (H+M+ 24%; H+M- 10%; P = 0.13).
Conclusions: In this large single-center study, biopsies with untreated histological TCMR and molecular quiescence had comparable clinical outcomes to cases with no rejection, whereas those with histologic and tissue gene expression confirmed TCMR had inferior outcomes.
期刊介绍:
The official journal of The Transplantation Society, and the International Liver Transplantation Society, Transplantation is published monthly and is the most cited and influential journal in the field, with more than 25,000 citations per year.
Transplantation has been the trusted source for extensive and timely coverage of the most important advances in transplantation for over 50 years. The Editors and Editorial Board are an international group of research and clinical leaders that includes many pioneers of the field, representing a diverse range of areas of expertise. This capable editorial team provides thoughtful and thorough peer review, and delivers rapid, careful and insightful editorial evaluation of all manuscripts submitted to the journal.
Transplantation is committed to rapid review and publication. The journal remains competitive with a time to first decision of fewer than 21 days. Transplantation was the first in the field to offer CME credit to its peer reviewers for reviews completed.
The journal publishes original research articles in original clinical science and original basic science. Short reports bring attention to research at the forefront of the field. Other areas covered include cell therapy and islet transplantation, immunobiology and genomics, and xenotransplantation.