Christine Becker, Sandra Stengel, Marco Roos, Attila Altiner, Simon Schwill
{"title":"Starting postgraduate medical training in general practice with a rotation in general practice - a qualitative study on experiences and effects.","authors":"Christine Becker, Sandra Stengel, Marco Roos, Attila Altiner, Simon Schwill","doi":"10.3205/zma001708","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In Germany, the rotation into the general practitioner's practice (GPP) as part of postgraduate medical training in general practice traditionally takes place at the end of the training period. The aim of this study was to explore possible subsequent effects of beginning training in the GPP from the perspective of general practitioners (GPs) and GP trainees.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nationwide, GPs and GP trainees were recruited who started specialization in GP in the GPP. Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted between June and October 2022 using a self-developed interview-guide. The results were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>N=15 interviews were conducted, averaging 54 minutes (32-75 minutes) each (9 federal states, 4 GPs, 11 GP trainees). From the participants' perspective, advantages included close supervision, flat hierarchies, more time for preparation and follow-up, self-directed learning as well as higher basic salary and regular working hours. Positive effects mentioned were reinforcement in career choice, early understanding of workflow in GPP, early development of a GP attitude and strengthening of professional self-confidence. Disadvantages included initial uncertainty at the beginning of the profession and limited opportunities for peer exchange. In conclusion, all participants would recommend beginning specialization with a rotation in the GPP.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Starting in GGP allows GP trainees to learn about GP in a self-directed, research-oriented manner and based on consultations which enables early professional identity formation. GP trainees should avoid lack of collegial support by participating in a postgraduate training program. In a second step, GP trainers perspectives need to be assessed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Beginning GP postgraduate training with a rotation in GP is advantageous and should be structurally promoted.</p>","PeriodicalId":45850,"journal":{"name":"GMS Journal for Medical Education","volume":"41 5","pages":"Doc53"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11656185/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GMS Journal for Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3205/zma001708","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: In Germany, the rotation into the general practitioner's practice (GPP) as part of postgraduate medical training in general practice traditionally takes place at the end of the training period. The aim of this study was to explore possible subsequent effects of beginning training in the GPP from the perspective of general practitioners (GPs) and GP trainees.
Methods: Nationwide, GPs and GP trainees were recruited who started specialization in GP in the GPP. Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted between June and October 2022 using a self-developed interview-guide. The results were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using content analysis.
Results: N=15 interviews were conducted, averaging 54 minutes (32-75 minutes) each (9 federal states, 4 GPs, 11 GP trainees). From the participants' perspective, advantages included close supervision, flat hierarchies, more time for preparation and follow-up, self-directed learning as well as higher basic salary and regular working hours. Positive effects mentioned were reinforcement in career choice, early understanding of workflow in GPP, early development of a GP attitude and strengthening of professional self-confidence. Disadvantages included initial uncertainty at the beginning of the profession and limited opportunities for peer exchange. In conclusion, all participants would recommend beginning specialization with a rotation in the GPP.
Discussion: Starting in GGP allows GP trainees to learn about GP in a self-directed, research-oriented manner and based on consultations which enables early professional identity formation. GP trainees should avoid lack of collegial support by participating in a postgraduate training program. In a second step, GP trainers perspectives need to be assessed.
Conclusion: Beginning GP postgraduate training with a rotation in GP is advantageous and should be structurally promoted.
期刊介绍：
GMS Journal for Medical Education (GMS J Med Educ) – formerly GMS Zeitschrift für Medizinische Ausbildung – publishes scientific articles on all aspects of undergraduate and graduate education in medicine, dentistry, veterinary medicine, pharmacy and other health professions. Research and review articles, project reports, short communications as well as discussion papers and comments may be submitted. There is a special focus on empirical studies which are methodologically sound and lead to results that are relevant beyond the respective institution, profession or country. Please feel free to submit qualitative as well as quantitative studies. We especially welcome submissions by students. It is the mission of GMS Journal for Medical Education to contribute to furthering scientific knowledge in the German-speaking countries as well as internationally and thus to foster the improvement of teaching and learning and to build an evidence base for undergraduate and graduate education. To this end, the journal has set up an editorial board with international experts. All manuscripts submitted are subjected to a clearly structured peer review process. All articles are published bilingually in English and German and are available with unrestricted open access. Thus, GMS Journal for Medical Education is available to a broad international readership. GMS Journal for Medical Education is published as an unrestricted open access journal with at least four issues per year. In addition, special issues on current topics in medical education research are also published. Until 2015 the journal was published under its German name GMS Zeitschrift für Medizinische Ausbildung. By changing its name to GMS Journal for Medical Education, we wish to underline our international mission.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
