Perceptions of supervision and feedback in PaedCompenda, the competency-based, post-graduate curriculum in pediatrics (www.paedcompenda.de).

IF 1.5 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
GMS Journal for Medical Education Pub Date : 2024-11-15 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3205/zma001710
Irene Somm, Marco Hajart, Folkert Fehr, Christoph Weiß-Becker
{"title":"Perceptions of supervision and feedback in PaedCompenda, the competency-based, post-graduate curriculum in pediatrics (www.paedcompenda.de).","authors":"Irene Somm, Marco Hajart, Folkert Fehr, Christoph Weiß-Becker","doi":"10.3205/zma001710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Both teachers and learners had clear reservations in the beginning about the usefulness and benefits of supervision and feedback, which were to be implemented as a teaching method in the competency-based, post-graduate curriculum in general ambulatory pediatrics, known as PaedCompenda (www.paedcompenda.de). This paper investigates the different perceptions of the physicians undergoing specialist training (<i>Ärzte in Weiterbildung</i>) and elucidates these differences.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The following data were collected as part of the research on the three-year-long implementation (2019-2023):1) Four focus group discussions (N=28) with physician trainees who had no experience in primary care pediatrics or with the post-graduate curriculum;2) Problem-oriented interviews, one at the beginning and again at the end, with physician trainees (N=28) undergoing specialist training at 19 participating medical practices belonging to two post-graduate education networks;3) Videos of patient consultations with the physician trainees (N=23);4) Videos of feedback conferences regarding the videotaped patient consultations (N=7).This data was evaluated using reconstructive grounded theory.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A distinctly more positive perception of the benefits of supervision and feedback as a teaching and learning method was seen in the physicians who received specialist training at the practices following the PaedCompenda curriculum. In regard to method, it is crucial that the educational setting can be experienced as a learning opportunity. Playing a central role in this is constructive and conducive feedback (a. dysfunctional routines, b. underlying lack of confidence, and c. overlooked problems).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This paper shows the opportunities of an institutionalized form of supervision and feedback as part of a competency-based, post-graduate curriculum while also making it clear that implementation is challenging. Furthermore, the medical specialists who serve as trainers need to be specifically trained to know which approaches promote learning effectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":45850,"journal":{"name":"GMS Journal for Medical Education","volume":"41 5","pages":"Doc55"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11656182/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GMS Journal for Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3205/zma001710","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Both teachers and learners had clear reservations in the beginning about the usefulness and benefits of supervision and feedback, which were to be implemented as a teaching method in the competency-based, post-graduate curriculum in general ambulatory pediatrics, known as PaedCompenda (www.paedcompenda.de). This paper investigates the different perceptions of the physicians undergoing specialist training (Ärzte in Weiterbildung) and elucidates these differences.

Method: The following data were collected as part of the research on the three-year-long implementation (2019-2023):1) Four focus group discussions (N=28) with physician trainees who had no experience in primary care pediatrics or with the post-graduate curriculum;2) Problem-oriented interviews, one at the beginning and again at the end, with physician trainees (N=28) undergoing specialist training at 19 participating medical practices belonging to two post-graduate education networks;3) Videos of patient consultations with the physician trainees (N=23);4) Videos of feedback conferences regarding the videotaped patient consultations (N=7).This data was evaluated using reconstructive grounded theory.

Results: A distinctly more positive perception of the benefits of supervision and feedback as a teaching and learning method was seen in the physicians who received specialist training at the practices following the PaedCompenda curriculum. In regard to method, it is crucial that the educational setting can be experienced as a learning opportunity. Playing a central role in this is constructive and conducive feedback (a. dysfunctional routines, b. underlying lack of confidence, and c. overlooked problems).

Conclusions: This paper shows the opportunities of an institutionalized form of supervision and feedback as part of a competency-based, post-graduate curriculum while also making it clear that implementation is challenging. Furthermore, the medical specialists who serve as trainers need to be specifically trained to know which approaches promote learning effectively.

在以能力为基础的儿科研究生课程PaedCompenda中对监督和反馈的感知(www.paedcompenda.de)。
目的:在以能力为基础的普通门诊儿科研究生课程PaedCompenda (www.paedcompenda.de)中,作为一种教学方法,监督与反馈的有用性和益处在一开始,教师和学习者都有明确的保留意见。本文调查了接受专科培训的医生的不同看法(Ärzte在Weiterbildung),并阐明了这些差异。方法:在为期三年(2019-2023)的实施过程中,收集了以下数据:1)与没有初级保健儿科经验或研究生课程的实习医师进行了4次焦点小组讨论(N=28);2)问题导向访谈,开始和结束各一次。在两个研究生教育网络的19个参与医疗实践中接受专科培训的医师学员(N=28);3)患者与培训医师的会诊视频(N=23);4)关于患者会诊视频的反馈会议视频(N=7)。这些数据使用重建接地理论进行评估。结果:在遵循PaedCompenda课程的实践中接受专业培训的医生明显更积极地认识到监督和反馈作为一种教学方法的好处。在方法方面,至关重要的是,教育环境可以作为一个学习机会来体验。在这方面发挥核心作用的是建设性和有益的反馈(a.不正常的日常工作,b.潜在的缺乏信心,c.被忽视的问题)。结论:本文展示了作为以能力为基础的研究生课程的一部分,制度化形式的监督和反馈的机会,同时也清楚地表明实施是具有挑战性的。此外,作为培训人员的医学专家需要接受专门培训,以了解哪些方法能有效促进学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
GMS Journal for Medical Education
GMS Journal for Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
30
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: GMS Journal for Medical Education (GMS J Med Educ) – formerly GMS Zeitschrift für Medizinische Ausbildung – publishes scientific articles on all aspects of undergraduate and graduate education in medicine, dentistry, veterinary medicine, pharmacy and other health professions. Research and review articles, project reports, short communications as well as discussion papers and comments may be submitted. There is a special focus on empirical studies which are methodologically sound and lead to results that are relevant beyond the respective institution, profession or country. Please feel free to submit qualitative as well as quantitative studies. We especially welcome submissions by students. It is the mission of GMS Journal for Medical Education to contribute to furthering scientific knowledge in the German-speaking countries as well as internationally and thus to foster the improvement of teaching and learning and to build an evidence base for undergraduate and graduate education. To this end, the journal has set up an editorial board with international experts. All manuscripts submitted are subjected to a clearly structured peer review process. All articles are published bilingually in English and German and are available with unrestricted open access. Thus, GMS Journal for Medical Education is available to a broad international readership. GMS Journal for Medical Education is published as an unrestricted open access journal with at least four issues per year. In addition, special issues on current topics in medical education research are also published. Until 2015 the journal was published under its German name GMS Zeitschrift für Medizinische Ausbildung. By changing its name to GMS Journal for Medical Education, we wish to underline our international mission.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信