Benchmarking a dual-scale hybrid simulation framework for small globular proteins combining the CHARMM36 and Martini2 models.

IF 2.7 4区 生物学 Q2 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Manjul Yadav, Shalmali Kharche, Shikha Prakash, Durba Sengupta
{"title":"Benchmarking a dual-scale hybrid simulation framework for small globular proteins combining the CHARMM36 and Martini2 models.","authors":"Manjul Yadav, Shalmali Kharche, Shikha Prakash, Durba Sengupta","doi":"10.1016/j.jmgm.2024.108926","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Multi-scale models in which varying resolutions are considered in a single molecular dynamics simulation setup are gaining importance in integrative modeling. However, combining atomistic and coarse-grain resolutions, especially for coarse-grain force fields derived from top-down approaches, have not been well explored. In this study, we have implemented and tested a dual-resolution simulation approach to model globular proteins in atomistic detail (represented by the CHARMM36 model) with the surrounding solvent in Martini2 coarse-grain detail. The hybrid scheme considered is an extension of a model implemented earlier for mainly lipid and water molecules. We have considered a set of small globular proteins and have extensively compared to atomistic benchmark simulations as well as a host of experimental observables. We show that the protein structural dynamics sampled in the hybrid scheme is robust, and the intra-protein contact maps are reproduced, despite increased fluctuations of the loop regions. A good match is observed with experimental small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) and NMR observables, such as chemical shifts and [Formula: see text] -coupling, with the best match obtained for the chemical shifts. However, deviations are observed in the water dynamics and protein-water interactions which we attribute to the limitation of solvent screening in the coarse-grain force field. The computational speed-up achieved is about 2-3 times compared to an all-atom system. Overall, the hybrid model is able to retain the main features of the underlying atomistic conformational landscape with a two-fold speed-up in computational cost.</p>","PeriodicalId":16361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of molecular graphics & modelling","volume":"135 ","pages":"108926"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of molecular graphics & modelling","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmgm.2024.108926","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Multi-scale models in which varying resolutions are considered in a single molecular dynamics simulation setup are gaining importance in integrative modeling. However, combining atomistic and coarse-grain resolutions, especially for coarse-grain force fields derived from top-down approaches, have not been well explored. In this study, we have implemented and tested a dual-resolution simulation approach to model globular proteins in atomistic detail (represented by the CHARMM36 model) with the surrounding solvent in Martini2 coarse-grain detail. The hybrid scheme considered is an extension of a model implemented earlier for mainly lipid and water molecules. We have considered a set of small globular proteins and have extensively compared to atomistic benchmark simulations as well as a host of experimental observables. We show that the protein structural dynamics sampled in the hybrid scheme is robust, and the intra-protein contact maps are reproduced, despite increased fluctuations of the loop regions. A good match is observed with experimental small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) and NMR observables, such as chemical shifts and [Formula: see text] -coupling, with the best match obtained for the chemical shifts. However, deviations are observed in the water dynamics and protein-water interactions which we attribute to the limitation of solvent screening in the coarse-grain force field. The computational speed-up achieved is about 2-3 times compared to an all-atom system. Overall, the hybrid model is able to retain the main features of the underlying atomistic conformational landscape with a two-fold speed-up in computational cost.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of molecular graphics & modelling
Journal of molecular graphics & modelling 生物-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.90%
发文量
216
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling is devoted to the publication of papers on the uses of computers in theoretical investigations of molecular structure, function, interaction, and design. The scope of the journal includes all aspects of molecular modeling and computational chemistry, including, for instance, the study of molecular shape and properties, molecular simulations, protein and polymer engineering, drug design, materials design, structure-activity and structure-property relationships, database mining, and compound library design. As a primary research journal, JMGM seeks to bring new knowledge to the attention of our readers. As such, submissions to the journal need to not only report results, but must draw conclusions and explore implications of the work presented. Authors are strongly encouraged to bear this in mind when preparing manuscripts. Routine applications of standard modelling approaches, providing only very limited new scientific insight, will not meet our criteria for publication. Reproducibility of reported calculations is an important issue. Wherever possible, we urge authors to enhance their papers with Supplementary Data, for example, in QSAR studies machine-readable versions of molecular datasets or in the development of new force-field parameters versions of the topology and force field parameter files. Routine applications of existing methods that do not lead to genuinely new insight will not be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信