What is Known About Early Mobilisation After Cardiac Electronic Device Implant? A Scoping Review.

IF 1.3 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Medical Devices-Evidence and Research Pub Date : 2024-12-16 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/MDER.S493641
Dalia Caleffi, Paola Ferri, Mauro Bellifemine, Sergio Rovesti, Miriam Valenti
{"title":"What is Known About Early Mobilisation After Cardiac Electronic Device Implant? A Scoping Review.","authors":"Dalia Caleffi, Paola Ferri, Mauro Bellifemine, Sergio Rovesti, Miriam Valenti","doi":"10.2147/MDER.S493641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The number of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) implanted has been growing and the population who receive the device is older and has more comorbidities. Long bed rest and immobilisation have always been common after the implant, but a consensus does not exist on the argument.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To map and synthesise available literature on the mobilisation approach after the implant of a CIED and which correlated outcomes exist.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was conducted in December 2023 on six databases. Screening of articles, data extraction and quality appraisal were performed by more than one author. Articles included were primary articles exploring bed rest or mobilisation after a CIED procedure. Descriptive analysis was conducted to present and synthesise the results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 113 records identified, eight matched the inclusion criteria. The majority of the articles were randomised controlled trials (n = 6). Other studies were quasi-experimental (n = 1), retrospective (n = 1) and cross-sectional (n = 1). Data descriptive analysis led to the development of three main topics: (1) mobilisation modalities, (2) potential complications and (3) type of device.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Early mobilisation after a CIED procedure appears to be safe and not associated with other complications. A predominant barrier to early mobilisation is the lack of a consensus on the time and type of mobilisation. Early mobilisation could be applied more safely with the use of an arm support. To strengthen the evidence there is a need for more rigorous research analysing the type of device and the leads utilised.</p>","PeriodicalId":47140,"journal":{"name":"Medical Devices-Evidence and Research","volume":"17 ","pages":"513-524"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11660658/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Devices-Evidence and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S493641","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The number of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) implanted has been growing and the population who receive the device is older and has more comorbidities. Long bed rest and immobilisation have always been common after the implant, but a consensus does not exist on the argument.

Purpose: To map and synthesise available literature on the mobilisation approach after the implant of a CIED and which correlated outcomes exist.

Methods: A literature search was conducted in December 2023 on six databases. Screening of articles, data extraction and quality appraisal were performed by more than one author. Articles included were primary articles exploring bed rest or mobilisation after a CIED procedure. Descriptive analysis was conducted to present and synthesise the results.

Results: Of the 113 records identified, eight matched the inclusion criteria. The majority of the articles were randomised controlled trials (n = 6). Other studies were quasi-experimental (n = 1), retrospective (n = 1) and cross-sectional (n = 1). Data descriptive analysis led to the development of three main topics: (1) mobilisation modalities, (2) potential complications and (3) type of device.

Conclusions: Early mobilisation after a CIED procedure appears to be safe and not associated with other complications. A predominant barrier to early mobilisation is the lack of a consensus on the time and type of mobilisation. Early mobilisation could be applied more safely with the use of an arm support. To strengthen the evidence there is a need for more rigorous research analysing the type of device and the leads utilised.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Devices-Evidence and Research
Medical Devices-Evidence and Research ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信