Blood-Based Biomarkers for Identifying Disease Activity in AQP4-IgG-Positive Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder.

IF 20.4 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Su-Hyun Kim, Ana Beatriz Ayroza Galvão Ribeiro Gomes, Patrick Schindler, Jae-Won Hyun, Ki Hoon Kim, Dong-Eun Lee, Vinicius Andreoli Schoeps, Aline de Moura Brasil Matos, Natalia Trombini Mendes, Samira Luisa Dos Apóstolos-Pereira, Dagoberto Callegaro, Jasmine Lerner, Pascal Benkert, Jens Kuhle, Klemens Ruprecht, Friedemann Paul, Anne-Katrin Pröbstel, Ho Jin Kim
{"title":"Blood-Based Biomarkers for Identifying Disease Activity in AQP4-IgG-Positive Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder.","authors":"Su-Hyun Kim, Ana Beatriz Ayroza Galvão Ribeiro Gomes, Patrick Schindler, Jae-Won Hyun, Ki Hoon Kim, Dong-Eun Lee, Vinicius Andreoli Schoeps, Aline de Moura Brasil Matos, Natalia Trombini Mendes, Samira Luisa Dos Apóstolos-Pereira, Dagoberto Callegaro, Jasmine Lerner, Pascal Benkert, Jens Kuhle, Klemens Ruprecht, Friedemann Paul, Anne-Katrin Pröbstel, Ho Jin Kim","doi":"10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.4400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>The temporal dynamics of serum glial fibrillary acidic protein (sGFAP) and serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) as biomarkers of disease activity for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) remain underexplored.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine optimal timing for assessing sGFAP and sNfL, establish cutoff values differentiating between attacks and remissions in NMOSD, and evaluate these findings across independent cohorts.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This retrospective, longitudinal, multicenter cohort study was conducted among patients with aquaporin-4 antibody (AQP4-IgG)-positive NMOSD. Patients with available stored serum samples were included, totaling 181 patients with 625 samples. Discovery cohort samples were collected from February 2008 to October 2023 and validation cohort samples were collected from January 2013 to October 2023. A combined analysis of both cohorts was conducted from November 2023 to March 2024.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>sNfL and sGFAP concentrations, measured by a single-molecule array assay.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcomes were the optimal timing of assessing sGFAP and sNfL and the adjusted cutoff values for evaluating disease activity in NMOSD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The discovery cohort consisted of 366 samples from 78 Korean patients (median [IQR] age, 35 [30-42] years; 73 female patients [95%]), while the validation cohort included 190 samples from 34 German patients (median [IQR] age, 54 [39-61] years; 32 female patients [94%]) and 69 samples from 69 Brazilian patients (median [IQR] age, 46 [35-55] years; 62 female patients [90%]). Six-month postattack temporal biomarker dynamics were analyzed in 202 samples from 74 patients in the discovery cohort: sGFAP levels peaked within the first week and sNfL levels peaked at 5 weeks postattack. The optimal time frames for evaluating attacks were within 1 week for sGFAP and from 1 to 8 weeks for sNfL, with remission defined as at least 6 months postattack. z Score cutoffs of 3.0 for sGFAP and 2.1 for sNfL effectively distinguished between attack and remission phases, indicated by area under the curve values of 0.95 (95% CI, 0.88-1.02) and 0.87 (95% CI, 0.82-0.91), respectively. The discovery cohort time frames and cutoff values were applied to the validation cohort, achieving 71% sensitivity and 94% specificity for sNfL and 100% sensitivity and specificity for sGFAP in the German and Brazilian cohorts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>This longitudinal cohort study established optimal timing and thresholds for sGFAP and sNfL, which were consistent in independent cohorts, supporting these biomarkers' effectiveness in distinguishing NMOSD attacks from remission.</p>","PeriodicalId":14677,"journal":{"name":"JAMA neurology","volume":" ","pages":"168-175"},"PeriodicalIF":20.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11811799/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.4400","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: The temporal dynamics of serum glial fibrillary acidic protein (sGFAP) and serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) as biomarkers of disease activity for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) remain underexplored.

Objective: To determine optimal timing for assessing sGFAP and sNfL, establish cutoff values differentiating between attacks and remissions in NMOSD, and evaluate these findings across independent cohorts.

Design, setting, and participants: This retrospective, longitudinal, multicenter cohort study was conducted among patients with aquaporin-4 antibody (AQP4-IgG)-positive NMOSD. Patients with available stored serum samples were included, totaling 181 patients with 625 samples. Discovery cohort samples were collected from February 2008 to October 2023 and validation cohort samples were collected from January 2013 to October 2023. A combined analysis of both cohorts was conducted from November 2023 to March 2024.

Exposures: sNfL and sGFAP concentrations, measured by a single-molecule array assay.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcomes were the optimal timing of assessing sGFAP and sNfL and the adjusted cutoff values for evaluating disease activity in NMOSD.

Results: The discovery cohort consisted of 366 samples from 78 Korean patients (median [IQR] age, 35 [30-42] years; 73 female patients [95%]), while the validation cohort included 190 samples from 34 German patients (median [IQR] age, 54 [39-61] years; 32 female patients [94%]) and 69 samples from 69 Brazilian patients (median [IQR] age, 46 [35-55] years; 62 female patients [90%]). Six-month postattack temporal biomarker dynamics were analyzed in 202 samples from 74 patients in the discovery cohort: sGFAP levels peaked within the first week and sNfL levels peaked at 5 weeks postattack. The optimal time frames for evaluating attacks were within 1 week for sGFAP and from 1 to 8 weeks for sNfL, with remission defined as at least 6 months postattack. z Score cutoffs of 3.0 for sGFAP and 2.1 for sNfL effectively distinguished between attack and remission phases, indicated by area under the curve values of 0.95 (95% CI, 0.88-1.02) and 0.87 (95% CI, 0.82-0.91), respectively. The discovery cohort time frames and cutoff values were applied to the validation cohort, achieving 71% sensitivity and 94% specificity for sNfL and 100% sensitivity and specificity for sGFAP in the German and Brazilian cohorts.

Conclusions and relevance: This longitudinal cohort study established optimal timing and thresholds for sGFAP and sNfL, which were consistent in independent cohorts, supporting these biomarkers' effectiveness in distinguishing NMOSD attacks from remission.

鉴别aqp4 - igg阳性视神经脊髓炎谱系障碍疾病活动性的血液生物标志物
重要性:血清胶质纤维酸性蛋白(sGFAP)和血清神经丝轻链(sNfL)作为视神经脊髓炎频谱障碍(NMOSD)疾病活动性的生物标志物的时间动态仍未得到充分研究。目的:确定评估sGFAP和sNfL的最佳时机,建立区分NMOSD发作和缓解的临界值,并在独立队列中评估这些发现。设计、环境和参与者:这项回顾性、纵向、多中心队列研究在水通道蛋白-4抗体(AQP4-IgG)阳性的NMOSD患者中进行。纳入有可用血清样本的患者,共181例患者,625份样本。发现队列样本采集于2008年2月至2023年10月,验证队列样本采集于2013年1月至2023年10月。从2023年11月到2024年3月对两个队列进行了联合分析。暴露:sNfL和sGFAP浓度,通过单分子阵列测定。主要结局和指标:主要结局是评估sGFAP和sNfL的最佳时机以及评估NMOSD疾病活动性的调整截断值。结果:发现队列包括来自78名韩国患者的366份样本(中位[IQR]年龄,35[30-42]岁;73名女性患者[95%]),而验证队列包括来自34名德国患者的190个样本(中位[IQR]年龄54[39-61]岁;32例女性患者[94%])和69例巴西患者的69份样本(中位[IQR]年龄46[35-55]岁;女性62例[90%])。研究人员对来自74名患者的202个样本进行了6个月后的时间生物标志物动态分析:sGFAP水平在第一周内达到峰值,sNfL水平在5周后达到峰值。评估发作的最佳时间框架为sGFAP在1周内,sNfL为1 - 8周,缓解定义为发作后至少6个月。sGFAP和sNfL的z Score截断值分别为3.0和2.1,有效地区分了发作期和缓解期,曲线下面积分别为0.95 (95% CI, 0.88-1.02)和0.87 (95% CI, 0.82-0.91)。将发现队列时间框架和截止值应用于验证队列,在德国和巴西队列中,sNfL的灵敏度为71%,特异性为94%,sGFAP的灵敏度和特异性为100%。结论和相关性:这项纵向队列研究确定了sGFAP和sNfL的最佳时间和阈值,这在独立队列中是一致的,支持这些生物标志物在区分NMOSD发作和缓解方面的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMA neurology
JAMA neurology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
41.90
自引率
1.70%
发文量
250
期刊介绍: JAMA Neurology is an international peer-reviewed journal for physicians caring for people with neurologic disorders and those interested in the structure and function of the normal and diseased nervous system. The Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry began publication in 1919 and, in 1959, became 2 separate journals: Archives of Neurology and Archives of General Psychiatry. In 2013, their names changed to JAMA Neurology and JAMA Psychiatry, respectively. JAMA Neurology is a member of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信