The impact of a couple-based intervention on one-year viral suppression among pregnant women living with HIV and their male partners in Malawi: A randomized controlled trial.
Nora E Rosenberg, Lauren A Graybill, Tiwonge Mtande, Nuala McGrath, Suzanne Maman, Tiyamike Nthani, Robert Krysiak, Isaac Thengolose, Irving F Hoffman, William C Miller, Mina Hosseinipour
{"title":"The impact of a couple-based intervention on one-year viral suppression among pregnant women living with HIV and their male partners in Malawi: A randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Nora E Rosenberg, Lauren A Graybill, Tiwonge Mtande, Nuala McGrath, Suzanne Maman, Tiyamike Nthani, Robert Krysiak, Isaac Thengolose, Irving F Hoffman, William C Miller, Mina Hosseinipour","doi":"10.1097/QAI.0000000000003583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Couple-based behavioral interventions (CBIs) have been associated with improved HIV virological outcomes for pregnant women and their male partners living with HIV in observational settings, but have never been tested in a randomized controlled trial (RCT).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Bwaila District Hospital Antenatal clinic (Lilongwe, Malawi).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An RCT was conducted among 500 pregnant women living with HIV (index clients) randomized 1:1 to the standard of care (SOC) or CBI and followed for one year. The CBI offered an initial session for index clients, HIV assisted partner notification, two enhanced couple counseling and testing sessions, illustrated materials, and antiretroviral therapy pick-up for either couple member at the antenatal clinic. At 12 months, viral load among index clients and male partners with HIV was measured. Risk differences (RD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) compared viral suppression (<1000 copies/ml) between arms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean index client age was 26.6 years; most were married or cohabiting (93.3%). Index client viral suppression was 6.5% higher in the CBI arm (88.0%) than in the SOC arm (81.6%). Male partner viral suppression was 16.2% higher in the CBI arm (73.6%) than the SOC arm (57.4%). Overall couple viral suppression was 7.8% higher (CI: 0.5% to 15.1%, p=0.04) in the CBI arm (84%) than in the SOC arm (76.0%). Social harms were rare (3.6%) and comparable between arms (p=0.8).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This CBI had a positive impact on couple viral suppression. Scaling this CBI to antenatal clients with HIV and their male partners could improve HIV outcomes among expecting families.</p>","PeriodicalId":14588,"journal":{"name":"JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000003583","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Couple-based behavioral interventions (CBIs) have been associated with improved HIV virological outcomes for pregnant women and their male partners living with HIV in observational settings, but have never been tested in a randomized controlled trial (RCT).
Setting: Bwaila District Hospital Antenatal clinic (Lilongwe, Malawi).
Methods: An RCT was conducted among 500 pregnant women living with HIV (index clients) randomized 1:1 to the standard of care (SOC) or CBI and followed for one year. The CBI offered an initial session for index clients, HIV assisted partner notification, two enhanced couple counseling and testing sessions, illustrated materials, and antiretroviral therapy pick-up for either couple member at the antenatal clinic. At 12 months, viral load among index clients and male partners with HIV was measured. Risk differences (RD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) compared viral suppression (<1000 copies/ml) between arms.
Results: Mean index client age was 26.6 years; most were married or cohabiting (93.3%). Index client viral suppression was 6.5% higher in the CBI arm (88.0%) than in the SOC arm (81.6%). Male partner viral suppression was 16.2% higher in the CBI arm (73.6%) than the SOC arm (57.4%). Overall couple viral suppression was 7.8% higher (CI: 0.5% to 15.1%, p=0.04) in the CBI arm (84%) than in the SOC arm (76.0%). Social harms were rare (3.6%) and comparable between arms (p=0.8).
Conclusion: This CBI had a positive impact on couple viral suppression. Scaling this CBI to antenatal clients with HIV and their male partners could improve HIV outcomes among expecting families.
期刊介绍:
JAIDS: Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes seeks to end the HIV epidemic by presenting important new science across all disciplines that advance our understanding of the biology, treatment and prevention of HIV infection worldwide.
JAIDS: Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes is the trusted, interdisciplinary resource for HIV- and AIDS-related information with a strong focus on basic and translational science, clinical science, and epidemiology and prevention. Co-edited by the foremost leaders in clinical virology, molecular biology, and epidemiology, JAIDS publishes vital information on the advances in diagnosis and treatment of HIV infections, as well as the latest research in the development of therapeutics and vaccine approaches. This ground-breaking journal brings together rigorously peer-reviewed articles, reviews of current research, results of clinical trials, and epidemiologic reports from around the world.