Optimal use of once-weekly basal insulin efsitora alfa in type 1 and type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Deep Dutta, Lakshmi Nagendra, Manoj Kumar, A B M Kamrul-Hasan, Saptarshi Bhattacharya
{"title":"Optimal use of once-weekly basal insulin efsitora alfa in type 1 and type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Deep Dutta, Lakshmi Nagendra, Manoj Kumar, A B M Kamrul-Hasan, Saptarshi Bhattacharya","doi":"10.1016/j.eprac.2024.12.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>No meta-analysis has holistically analyzed and summarized the efficacy and safety of the novel once-weekly basal insulin efsitora alfa in managing type 1 diabetes (T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical trials involving subjects with T1D and T2D receiving once-weekly efsitora alfa in the intervention arm and once-daily basal insulins in the control arm were searched throughout the electronic databases. The primary outcome assessed was the change from baseline in HbA1c.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 6 studies (2,465 subjects) were analyzed (follow-up 26-54 weeks). Once-weekly efsitora alfa and once-daily degludec achieved comparable HbA1c reduction in study subjects with T2D (mean difference [MD] 0.02% [-0.11, 0.16]; P = 0.74) and T1D (MD 0.11% [-0.01, 0.22]; P = 0.08). Efsitora and degludec were similarly effective in reducing fasting plasma glucose and achieving HbA1c <7% in subjects with T2D. Individuals with T2D and T1D in the two groups had comparable time in range, time above range, and time below range. Subjects with T2D receiving efsitora and once-daily basal insulin had comparable total adverse events (TAEs), severe adverse events (SAEs), injection-site reactions, hypersensitivity events, and overall and severe hypoglycemia; however, nocturnal hypoglycemia risk was lower with efsitora (risk ratio 0.85 [0.74, 0.98]; P = 0.03). However, in individuals with T1D, TAEs, SAEs, and injection-site reactions were higher with efsitora, with comparable risks of hypersensitivity events and overall, severe and nocturnal hypoglycemia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Once-weekly basal insulin efsitora alfa is well tolerated with glycaemic efficacy similar to once-daily degludec.</p>","PeriodicalId":11682,"journal":{"name":"Endocrine Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrine Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eprac.2024.12.013","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: No meta-analysis has holistically analyzed and summarized the efficacy and safety of the novel once-weekly basal insulin efsitora alfa in managing type 1 diabetes (T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D).

Methods: Clinical trials involving subjects with T1D and T2D receiving once-weekly efsitora alfa in the intervention arm and once-daily basal insulins in the control arm were searched throughout the electronic databases. The primary outcome assessed was the change from baseline in HbA1c.

Results: Data from 6 studies (2,465 subjects) were analyzed (follow-up 26-54 weeks). Once-weekly efsitora alfa and once-daily degludec achieved comparable HbA1c reduction in study subjects with T2D (mean difference [MD] 0.02% [-0.11, 0.16]; P = 0.74) and T1D (MD 0.11% [-0.01, 0.22]; P = 0.08). Efsitora and degludec were similarly effective in reducing fasting plasma glucose and achieving HbA1c <7% in subjects with T2D. Individuals with T2D and T1D in the two groups had comparable time in range, time above range, and time below range. Subjects with T2D receiving efsitora and once-daily basal insulin had comparable total adverse events (TAEs), severe adverse events (SAEs), injection-site reactions, hypersensitivity events, and overall and severe hypoglycemia; however, nocturnal hypoglycemia risk was lower with efsitora (risk ratio 0.85 [0.74, 0.98]; P = 0.03). However, in individuals with T1D, TAEs, SAEs, and injection-site reactions were higher with efsitora, with comparable risks of hypersensitivity events and overall, severe and nocturnal hypoglycemia.

Conclusion: Once-weekly basal insulin efsitora alfa is well tolerated with glycaemic efficacy similar to once-daily degludec.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Endocrine Practice
Endocrine Practice ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
546
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Endocrine Practice (ISSN: 1530-891X), a peer-reviewed journal published twelve times a year, is the official journal of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE). The primary mission of Endocrine Practice is to enhance the health care of patients with endocrine diseases through continuing education of practicing endocrinologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信