A Phase 1, Open-Label, Randomized, Two-Part Study in Healthy Adult Volunteers to Evaluate the Bioavailability of the Maribavir Powder for Oral Suspension, as Well as Food Effect and Impact of Rabeprazole.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Olivia Campagne, Katarina Ilic, Andre Gabriel, Katsuhiko Sueda, Ran Ye, Fangqiu Zhang, Peixin Xu, Hnin Hnin Ko, Kefeng Sun
{"title":"A Phase 1, Open-Label, Randomized, Two-Part Study in Healthy Adult Volunteers to Evaluate the Bioavailability of the Maribavir Powder for Oral Suspension, as Well as Food Effect and Impact of Rabeprazole.","authors":"Olivia Campagne, Katarina Ilic, Andre Gabriel, Katsuhiko Sueda, Ran Ye, Fangqiu Zhang, Peixin Xu, Hnin Hnin Ko, Kefeng Sun","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.1493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The relative bioavailability and impact of food and the proton pump inhibitor rabeprazole on the pharmacokinetics of a maribavir powder-for-oral-suspension formulation was investigated in a Phase 1 open-label study in healthy adult volunteers. A single 200-mg maribavir dose was administered as the commercial tablet (Treatment A), powder formulation (Treatment B), or powder formulation with a high-fat/high-calorie meal (Treatment C) in Part 1, and as the powder formulation alone (Treatment D) or following administration of rabeprazole 20 mg once daily for 5 days (Treatment E) in Part 2. Maribavir maximum plasma concentration following Treatment B was 18% lower versus Treatment A, whereas the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from time 0 to the last quantifiable concentration or infinity were similar. Maribavir maximum plasma concentration, AUC from time 0 to the last quantifiable concentration, and AUC from time 0 to infinity were reduced by 42%, 18%, and 18% (Treatment C vs Treatment B), and by 51%, 30%, and 11% (Treatment E vs Treatment D), respectively. A clinically significant reduction in maribavir exposure is not expected when maribavir powder formulation is taken with food or proton pump inhibitors. Participants assessed the powder for oral suspension as easy to swallow and having an acceptable taste/texture. Safety profiles for maribavir formulations in this study were consistent with those previously published.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpdd.1493","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The relative bioavailability and impact of food and the proton pump inhibitor rabeprazole on the pharmacokinetics of a maribavir powder-for-oral-suspension formulation was investigated in a Phase 1 open-label study in healthy adult volunteers. A single 200-mg maribavir dose was administered as the commercial tablet (Treatment A), powder formulation (Treatment B), or powder formulation with a high-fat/high-calorie meal (Treatment C) in Part 1, and as the powder formulation alone (Treatment D) or following administration of rabeprazole 20 mg once daily for 5 days (Treatment E) in Part 2. Maribavir maximum plasma concentration following Treatment B was 18% lower versus Treatment A, whereas the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from time 0 to the last quantifiable concentration or infinity were similar. Maribavir maximum plasma concentration, AUC from time 0 to the last quantifiable concentration, and AUC from time 0 to infinity were reduced by 42%, 18%, and 18% (Treatment C vs Treatment B), and by 51%, 30%, and 11% (Treatment E vs Treatment D), respectively. A clinically significant reduction in maribavir exposure is not expected when maribavir powder formulation is taken with food or proton pump inhibitors. Participants assessed the powder for oral suspension as easy to swallow and having an acceptable taste/texture. Safety profiles for maribavir formulations in this study were consistent with those previously published.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
154
期刊介绍: Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development is an international, peer-reviewed, online publication focused on publishing high-quality clinical pharmacology studies in drug development which are primarily (but not exclusively) performed in early development phases in healthy subjects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信