A pilot study for speech assessment to detect the severity of Parkinson's disease: An ensemble approach.

IF 7 2区 医学 Q1 BIOLOGY
Computers in biology and medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-21 DOI:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.109565
Guilherme C Oliveira, Nemuel D Pah, Quoc C Ngo, Arissa Yoshida, Nícolas B Gomes, João P Papa, Dinesh Kumar
{"title":"A pilot study for speech assessment to detect the severity of Parkinson's disease: An ensemble approach.","authors":"Guilherme C Oliveira, Nemuel D Pah, Quoc C Ngo, Arissa Yoshida, Nícolas B Gomes, João P Papa, Dinesh Kumar","doi":"10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.109565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Changes in voice are a symptom of Parkinson's disease and used to assess the progression of the condition. However, natural differences in the voices of people can make this challenging. Computerized binary speech classification can identify people with PD (PwPD), but its multiclass application to detect the severity of the disease remains difficult.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study investigated six diadochokinetic (DDK) tasks, four features (phonation, articulation, prosody, and their fusion), and three machine learning models for four severity levels of PwPD. The four binary classifications were: (i) Normal vs Not Normal, (ii) Slight vs Not Slight, (iii) Mild vs Not Mild and (iv) Moderate vs. Not Moderate. The best task and features for each class were identified and the models were ensembled to develop a multiclass model to distinguish between Normal vs. Slight vs. Mild vs. Moderate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For Normal vs Not-normal, logistic regression (LR) using the prosody from \"ka-ka-ka\" task, Random Forest (RF) using articulation from \"petaka\" for Slight vs Not Slight, RF for the fusion from \"ka-ka-ka\" for Mild vs Not Mild and Gradient Boosting (GB) using prosody from \"ta-ta-ta\" for Moderate vs Not Moderate gave the best results. Combining these using LR achieved an accuracy of 72%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dividing the multiclass problem into four binary problems gives the optimum speech features for each class. This pilot study, conducted on a small public dataset, shows the potential of computerized speech analysis using DDK to evaluate the severity of Parkinson's disease voice symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":10578,"journal":{"name":"Computers in biology and medicine","volume":"185 ","pages":"109565"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in biology and medicine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.109565","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Changes in voice are a symptom of Parkinson's disease and used to assess the progression of the condition. However, natural differences in the voices of people can make this challenging. Computerized binary speech classification can identify people with PD (PwPD), but its multiclass application to detect the severity of the disease remains difficult.

Method: This study investigated six diadochokinetic (DDK) tasks, four features (phonation, articulation, prosody, and their fusion), and three machine learning models for four severity levels of PwPD. The four binary classifications were: (i) Normal vs Not Normal, (ii) Slight vs Not Slight, (iii) Mild vs Not Mild and (iv) Moderate vs. Not Moderate. The best task and features for each class were identified and the models were ensembled to develop a multiclass model to distinguish between Normal vs. Slight vs. Mild vs. Moderate.

Results: For Normal vs Not-normal, logistic regression (LR) using the prosody from "ka-ka-ka" task, Random Forest (RF) using articulation from "petaka" for Slight vs Not Slight, RF for the fusion from "ka-ka-ka" for Mild vs Not Mild and Gradient Boosting (GB) using prosody from "ta-ta-ta" for Moderate vs Not Moderate gave the best results. Combining these using LR achieved an accuracy of 72%.

Conclusion: Dividing the multiclass problem into four binary problems gives the optimum speech features for each class. This pilot study, conducted on a small public dataset, shows the potential of computerized speech analysis using DDK to evaluate the severity of Parkinson's disease voice symptoms.

一项用于检测帕金森病严重程度的言语评估的初步研究:综合方法。
背景:声音变化是帕金森病的一种症状,可用于评估病情进展。然而,人们声音的自然差异会让这变得很有挑战性。计算机化二元语音分类可以识别PD患者,但其多类别应用于疾病严重程度的检测仍存在困难。方法:研究了PwPD 4个严重程度的6个双代动力学(DDK)任务、4个特征(发音、发音、韵律及其融合)和3个机器学习模型。四种二元分类是:(i)正常vs不正常,(ii)轻微vs不轻微,(iii)轻微vs不轻微,(iv)中度vs不中度。确定每个类别的最佳任务和特征,并将模型集成以开发多类别模型,以区分正常与轻微、轻度与中度。结果:对于正常与非正常,逻辑回归(LR)使用来自“ka-ka-ka”任务的韵律,随机森林(RF)使用来自“petaka”的发音来区分轻微与不轻微,RF使用来自“ka-ka-ka”的融合来区分轻微与不轻微,梯度增强(GB)使用来自“ta-ta-ta”的韵律来区分中度与非中度,得到了最好的结果。将这些结合使用LR,准确率达到72%。结论:将多类问题划分为4个二值问题,给出了每一类的最优语音特征。这项试点研究在一个小型公共数据集上进行,显示了使用DDK进行计算机化语音分析以评估帕金森病声音症状严重程度的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computers in biology and medicine
Computers in biology and medicine 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
10.40%
发文量
1086
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: Computers in Biology and Medicine is an international forum for sharing groundbreaking advancements in the use of computers in bioscience and medicine. This journal serves as a medium for communicating essential research, instruction, ideas, and information regarding the rapidly evolving field of computer applications in these domains. By encouraging the exchange of knowledge, we aim to facilitate progress and innovation in the utilization of computers in biology and medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信