ChatGPT Can Often Respond Adequately to Common Patient Questions Regarding Femoroacetabular Impingement.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Jeremy M Adelstein, Margaret A Sinkler, Lambert T Li, Luc M Fortier, Ajit M Vakharia, Michael J Salata
{"title":"ChatGPT Can Often Respond Adequately to Common Patient Questions Regarding Femoroacetabular Impingement.","authors":"Jeremy M Adelstein, Margaret A Sinkler, Lambert T Li, Luc M Fortier, Ajit M Vakharia, Michael J Salata","doi":"10.1097/JSM.0000000000001327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to analyze the ability of ChatGPT to answer frequently asked questions (FAQs) regarding FAI. We hypothesize that ChatGPT can provide accurate and thorough responses when presented with FAQs regarding FAI.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Ten FAQs regarding FAI were presented to ChatGPT 3.5 and initial responses were recorded and analyzed against evidence-based literature. Responses were rated as \"excellent response requiring no further clarification,\" \"satisfactory response requiring minimal clarification,\" \"satisfactory response requiring moderate clarification,\" or \"unsatisfactory response requiring substantial clarification.\"</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Institutional.</p><p><strong>Independent variables: </strong>Frequently asked questions regarding femoroacetabular impingement.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Accuracy and thoroughness of ChatGPT responses to FAQs. Hypothesis was formulated before data collection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most responses from ChatGPT were rated as satisfactory and required only minimal clarification. Two responses received an excellent rating and required no further clarification, while only 1 response from ChatGPT was rated unsatisfactory and required substantial clarification.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ChatGPT provided largely accurate and thorough responses to FAQs regarding FAI while appropriately reiterating the importance of always consulting a medical professional.</p>","PeriodicalId":10355,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JSM.0000000000001327","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to analyze the ability of ChatGPT to answer frequently asked questions (FAQs) regarding FAI. We hypothesize that ChatGPT can provide accurate and thorough responses when presented with FAQs regarding FAI.

Design: Ten FAQs regarding FAI were presented to ChatGPT 3.5 and initial responses were recorded and analyzed against evidence-based literature. Responses were rated as "excellent response requiring no further clarification," "satisfactory response requiring minimal clarification," "satisfactory response requiring moderate clarification," or "unsatisfactory response requiring substantial clarification."

Setting: Institutional.

Independent variables: Frequently asked questions regarding femoroacetabular impingement.

Main outcome measures: Accuracy and thoroughness of ChatGPT responses to FAQs. Hypothesis was formulated before data collection.

Results: Most responses from ChatGPT were rated as satisfactory and required only minimal clarification. Two responses received an excellent rating and required no further clarification, while only 1 response from ChatGPT was rated unsatisfactory and required substantial clarification.

Conclusions: ChatGPT provided largely accurate and thorough responses to FAQs regarding FAI while appropriately reiterating the importance of always consulting a medical professional.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
7.40%
发文量
185
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine is an international refereed journal published for clinicians with a primary interest in sports medicine practice. The journal publishes original research and reviews covering diagnostics, therapeutics, and rehabilitation in healthy and physically challenged individuals of all ages and levels of sport and exercise participation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信