Durlobactam in combination with β-lactams to combat Mycobacterium abscessus.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Pub Date : 2025-02-13 Epub Date: 2024-12-23 DOI:10.1128/aac.01174-24
Eunjeong Shin, Khalid M Dousa, Magdalena A Taracila, Christopher R Bethel, Mary Nantongo, David C Nguyen, Chidiebere Akusobi, Sebastian G Kurz, Mark S Plummer, Charles L Daley, Steven M Holland, Eric J Rubin, Jürgen B Bulitta, W Henry Boom, Barry N Kreiswirth, Robert A Bonomo
{"title":"Durlobactam in combination with β-lactams to combat <i>Mycobacterium abscessus</i>.","authors":"Eunjeong Shin, Khalid M Dousa, Magdalena A Taracila, Christopher R Bethel, Mary Nantongo, David C Nguyen, Chidiebere Akusobi, Sebastian G Kurz, Mark S Plummer, Charles L Daley, Steven M Holland, Eric J Rubin, Jürgen B Bulitta, W Henry Boom, Barry N Kreiswirth, Robert A Bonomo","doi":"10.1128/aac.01174-24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Mycobacterium abscessus</i> (<i>Mab</i>) presents significant clinical challenges. This study evaluated the synergistic effects of a β-lactam and β-lactamase inhibitor combination against <i>Mab</i> and explored the underlying mechanisms. Synergy was assessed through MIC tests and time-kill studies, and binding affinities of nine β-lactams and BLIs to eight target receptors (L,D-transpeptidases [LDT] 1-5, D,D-carboxypeptidase, penicillin-binding protein [PBP] B, and PBP-lipo) were assessed using mass spectrometry and kinetic studies. Thermal stability and morphological changes were determined. Imipenem demonstrated high binding affinity to LDTs and PBPs, with extremely low inhibition constants (<i>K<sub>i</sub></i><sub>,<i>app</i></sub>; ≤0.002 mg/L for LDT1-2, ≤0.6 mg/L for PBPs), while cephalosporins, sulopenem, tebipenem, and amoxicillin exhibited moderate to low binding affinity. Durlobactam inactivated Bla<sub>Mab</sub> and LDT/PBPs more potently than avibactam. The <i>K<sub>i,app</sub></i>s of durlobactam for PBP B, PBP-lipo, and LDT2 were below clinically achievable unbound concentrations, while avibactam's <i>K<sub>i,app</sub></i> for LDT/PBPs exceeded the clinical concentrations. Single β-lactam treatments resulted in minimal killing (~1 log<sub>10</sub> reduction). Although avibactam yielded no effect, combinations with avibactam showed a significant reduction (~4 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/mL). Durlobactam alone showed ~2 log<sub>10</sub> reduction, and when combined with imipenem or two β-lactams, durlobactam achieved near-eradication of <i>Mab</i>, surpassing the current therapy (amikacin + clarithromycin + imipenem/cefoxitin). Inactivation of PBP-lipo by sulopenem, imipenem, durlobactam, and amoxicillin (with avibactam) led to morphological changes, showing filaments. This study demonstrates the mechanistic basis of combinations therapy, particularly imipenem + durlobactam, in overcoming β-lactam resistance in <i>Mab</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":8152,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"e0117424"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11823594/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.01174-24","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mycobacterium abscessus (Mab) presents significant clinical challenges. This study evaluated the synergistic effects of a β-lactam and β-lactamase inhibitor combination against Mab and explored the underlying mechanisms. Synergy was assessed through MIC tests and time-kill studies, and binding affinities of nine β-lactams and BLIs to eight target receptors (L,D-transpeptidases [LDT] 1-5, D,D-carboxypeptidase, penicillin-binding protein [PBP] B, and PBP-lipo) were assessed using mass spectrometry and kinetic studies. Thermal stability and morphological changes were determined. Imipenem demonstrated high binding affinity to LDTs and PBPs, with extremely low inhibition constants (Ki,app; ≤0.002 mg/L for LDT1-2, ≤0.6 mg/L for PBPs), while cephalosporins, sulopenem, tebipenem, and amoxicillin exhibited moderate to low binding affinity. Durlobactam inactivated BlaMab and LDT/PBPs more potently than avibactam. The Ki,apps of durlobactam for PBP B, PBP-lipo, and LDT2 were below clinically achievable unbound concentrations, while avibactam's Ki,app for LDT/PBPs exceeded the clinical concentrations. Single β-lactam treatments resulted in minimal killing (~1 log10 reduction). Although avibactam yielded no effect, combinations with avibactam showed a significant reduction (~4 log10 CFU/mL). Durlobactam alone showed ~2 log10 reduction, and when combined with imipenem or two β-lactams, durlobactam achieved near-eradication of Mab, surpassing the current therapy (amikacin + clarithromycin + imipenem/cefoxitin). Inactivation of PBP-lipo by sulopenem, imipenem, durlobactam, and amoxicillin (with avibactam) led to morphological changes, showing filaments. This study demonstrates the mechanistic basis of combinations therapy, particularly imipenem + durlobactam, in overcoming β-lactam resistance in Mab.

杜洛巴坦联合β-内酰胺抗脓肿分枝杆菌。
脓肿分枝杆菌(Mab)提出了重大的临床挑战。本研究评估了β-内酰胺和β-内酰胺酶抑制剂联合抗单抗的协同作用,并探讨了其潜在机制。通过MIC试验和时间杀伤研究评估了协同作用,并利用质谱和动力学研究评估了9种β-内酰胺类和bli与8种靶受体(L、D-转肽酶[LDT] 1-5、D、D-羧肽酶、青霉素结合蛋白[PBP] B和PBP-脂质)的结合亲和力。测定了热稳定性和形态变化。亚胺培南对LDTs和PBPs具有很高的结合亲和力,具有极低的抑制常数(Ki,app;LDT1-2≤0.002 mg/L, PBPs≤0.6 mg/L),而头孢菌素、舒洛培南、替比培南和阿莫西林的结合亲和力为中低。Durlobactam比avibactam更有效地灭活BlaMab和LDT/PBPs。杜氯巴坦对PBP B、PBP-lipo和LDT2的Ki、app均低于临床可达到的未结合浓度,而阿维巴坦对LDT/PBPs的Ki、app高于临床浓度。单次β-内酰胺处理的杀伤效果最小(约1 log10)。虽然阿维巴坦没有效果,但与阿维巴坦联合使用可显着降低(~4 log10 CFU/mL)。杜氯巴坦单用可降低~2 log10,当与亚胺培南或两种β-内酰胺类药物联合使用时,杜氯巴坦几乎消除了单抗,超过了目前的治疗方法(阿米卡星+克拉霉素+亚胺培南/头孢西丁)。舒洛培南、亚胺培南、杜氯巴坦和阿莫西林(与阿维巴坦一起)使PBP-lipo失活,导致形态改变,显示丝状。这项研究证明了联合治疗的机制基础,特别是亚胺培南+杜氯巴坦,在克服单抗β-内酰胺耐药。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
8.20%
发文量
762
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (AAC) features interdisciplinary studies that build our understanding of the underlying mechanisms and therapeutic applications of antimicrobial and antiparasitic agents and chemotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信