Assessing the prevalence of personality pathology in Australian psychiatric emergency care centres: A feasibility study.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Australasian Psychiatry Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-23 DOI:10.1177/10398562241308711
Yvonne Nguyen, Nick Glozier, Jacqueline Huber
{"title":"Assessing the prevalence of personality pathology in Australian psychiatric emergency care centres: A feasibility study.","authors":"Yvonne Nguyen, Nick Glozier, Jacqueline Huber","doi":"10.1177/10398562241308711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectivesTo assess feasibility and acceptability of self-report measures in estimating prevalence of measurable personality disorder (PD) pathology in a Psychiatric Emergency Care Centre (PECC) unit.MethodPatients meeting eligibility criteria admitted to an inner-city PECC unit were invited to complete the (1) Standardised Assessment of Personality - Abbreviated Scale (SAPAS), (2) Personality Inventory of DSM-5 Brief Form (PID-5-BF), and (3) Level of Personality Functioning Scale - Brief Form 2.0 (LPFS-BF-2.0).ResultsThere were 24 participants - 80% of invited patients but only 51% of eligible patients and 21% of total PECC inpatients. Barriers to recruitment included: not meeting eligibility criteria, rapid discharge, and high workload. All participants completed the self-report measures. There was a very high prevalence of likely PD (87.5%) (SAPAS), personality trait dysfunction (87.5%) (PID-5-BF) and impaired personality functioning (91.7%) (LPFS-BF 2.0) but there was a low rate of agreement between discharge summary diagnoses and self-report measures.ConclusionsUsing self-report measures to assess PD pathology in a PECC unit was acceptable and may improve discharge summary diagnosis accuracy. Logistical challenges may limit this approach unless it can be embedded in routine care measures. Having accurate prevalence estimates would enable appropriate research, treatment and resourcing in PECCs.</p>","PeriodicalId":8630,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"511-518"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10398562241308711","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectivesTo assess feasibility and acceptability of self-report measures in estimating prevalence of measurable personality disorder (PD) pathology in a Psychiatric Emergency Care Centre (PECC) unit.MethodPatients meeting eligibility criteria admitted to an inner-city PECC unit were invited to complete the (1) Standardised Assessment of Personality - Abbreviated Scale (SAPAS), (2) Personality Inventory of DSM-5 Brief Form (PID-5-BF), and (3) Level of Personality Functioning Scale - Brief Form 2.0 (LPFS-BF-2.0).ResultsThere were 24 participants - 80% of invited patients but only 51% of eligible patients and 21% of total PECC inpatients. Barriers to recruitment included: not meeting eligibility criteria, rapid discharge, and high workload. All participants completed the self-report measures. There was a very high prevalence of likely PD (87.5%) (SAPAS), personality trait dysfunction (87.5%) (PID-5-BF) and impaired personality functioning (91.7%) (LPFS-BF 2.0) but there was a low rate of agreement between discharge summary diagnoses and self-report measures.ConclusionsUsing self-report measures to assess PD pathology in a PECC unit was acceptable and may improve discharge summary diagnosis accuracy. Logistical challenges may limit this approach unless it can be embedded in routine care measures. Having accurate prevalence estimates would enable appropriate research, treatment and resourcing in PECCs.

评估澳大利亚精神病急救中心的人格病理学患病率:一项可行性研究。
目的:评估自我报告方法在评估精神科急诊护理中心(PECC)可测量人格障碍(PD)病理患病率方面的可行性和可接受性。方法:邀请符合资格标准的内城PECC住院患者完成(1)人格标准化评估-简化量表(SAPAS), (2) DSM-5简要表格人格清单(PID-5-BF)和(3)人格功能水平量表-简要表格2.0 (LPFS-BF-2.0)。结果:共有24名参与者,占受邀患者的80%,但只有51%的合格患者和21%的PECC住院患者。招聘的障碍包括:不符合资格标准、快速离职和工作量大。所有参与者都完成了自我报告测量。可能的PD (87.5%) (SAPAS)、人格特质功能障碍(87.5%)(PID-5-BF)和人格功能受损(91.7%)(LPFS-BF 2.0)的患病率非常高,但出院总结诊断和自我报告测量之间的一致性很低。结论:在PECC单位使用自我报告方法评估PD病理是可以接受的,并且可以提高出院总结诊断的准确性。后勤方面的挑战可能会限制这种方法,除非它能被纳入日常护理措施。准确的患病率估计将使PECCs能够进行适当的研究、治疗和资源配置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australasian Psychiatry
Australasian Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
159
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australasian Psychiatry is the bi-monthly journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists (RANZCP) that aims to promote the art of psychiatry and its maintenance of excellence in practice. The journal is peer-reviewed and accepts submissions, presented as original research; reviews; descriptions of innovative services; comments on policy, history, politics, economics, training, ethics and the Arts as they relate to mental health and mental health services; statements of opinion and letters. Book reviews are commissioned by the editor. A section of the journal provides information on RANZCP business and related matters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信