Forestry on abandoned agricultural land: Future options for Russia

IF 6 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Denis Dobrynin, Alexander Vorbrugg, Teppo Hujala
{"title":"Forestry on abandoned agricultural land: Future options for Russia","authors":"Denis Dobrynin, Alexander Vorbrugg, Teppo Hujala","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Farmland abandonment and its natural afforestation occur in many countries, although net cropland expansion continues globally. Some strategies focus on recultivating abandoned farmland, while others focus on alternative land uses, including silviculture, carbon sequestration, and rewilding. Russia holds the world’s largest areas of abandoned farmland overgrown with forests. However, these forests are informal and unregulated since no legal land category allows landowners to engage in forestry. Environmental NGOs and forest experts advocate for silviculture on abandoned farmland as an alternative to ‘wood mining’ in primary wild forests. In contrast, pro-agrarian policymakers and state actors resist this idea by discussing recultivation, national food security, and state land control. The future management of Russia’s abandoned farmland has potential global environmental and economic impacts, yet it remains understudied. This study aims to understand (1) what future options for forest management on abandoned farmland are plausible in Russia, how they compare to those in other countries, and (2) how experts justify the preferability and likelihood of these future options. The study is based on the Delphi approach: two rounds of anonymous expert evaluation with controlled feedback. We identified seven future management alternatives: business as usual, agricultural recultivation, carbon forest management, and four forest management options. The most preferable options include private forestry: small-scale forestry managed by private landowners and large-scale industrial forestry managed by companies. The least preferable option is the most probable: business as usual – informal and unregulated forests on unused, abandoned farmland. No option was assessed as highly preferable and highly probable. Using the Russian example, we conclude that abandoned farmland use policies may consider forestry a future management option. However, opening abandoned farmlands to forestry may encounter legal and institutional barriers and cause controversy.","PeriodicalId":17933,"journal":{"name":"Land Use Policy","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Land Use Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107435","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Farmland abandonment and its natural afforestation occur in many countries, although net cropland expansion continues globally. Some strategies focus on recultivating abandoned farmland, while others focus on alternative land uses, including silviculture, carbon sequestration, and rewilding. Russia holds the world’s largest areas of abandoned farmland overgrown with forests. However, these forests are informal and unregulated since no legal land category allows landowners to engage in forestry. Environmental NGOs and forest experts advocate for silviculture on abandoned farmland as an alternative to ‘wood mining’ in primary wild forests. In contrast, pro-agrarian policymakers and state actors resist this idea by discussing recultivation, national food security, and state land control. The future management of Russia’s abandoned farmland has potential global environmental and economic impacts, yet it remains understudied. This study aims to understand (1) what future options for forest management on abandoned farmland are plausible in Russia, how they compare to those in other countries, and (2) how experts justify the preferability and likelihood of these future options. The study is based on the Delphi approach: two rounds of anonymous expert evaluation with controlled feedback. We identified seven future management alternatives: business as usual, agricultural recultivation, carbon forest management, and four forest management options. The most preferable options include private forestry: small-scale forestry managed by private landowners and large-scale industrial forestry managed by companies. The least preferable option is the most probable: business as usual – informal and unregulated forests on unused, abandoned farmland. No option was assessed as highly preferable and highly probable. Using the Russian example, we conclude that abandoned farmland use policies may consider forestry a future management option. However, opening abandoned farmlands to forestry may encounter legal and institutional barriers and cause controversy.
废弃农业用地上的林业:俄罗斯未来的选择
尽管全球耕地净扩张仍在继续,但许多国家都发生了撂荒及其自然造林的现象。一些战略侧重于重新开垦被遗弃的农田,而另一些战略则侧重于替代土地用途,包括造林、碳封存和野生化。俄罗斯拥有世界上面积最大的被森林覆盖的废弃农田。然而,这些森林是非正式和不受管制的,因为没有合法的土地类别允许土地所有者从事林业。环保非政府组织和森林专家提倡在废弃农田上进行造林,以替代在原始野生森林中“采伐木材”。相比之下,支持农业的政策制定者和国家行为者通过讨论复垦、国家粮食安全和国家土地控制来抵制这一想法。俄罗斯废弃农田的未来管理可能对全球环境和经济产生潜在影响,但仍未得到充分研究。本研究旨在了解(1)在俄罗斯,废弃农田的森林管理的未来选择是合理的,与其他国家的选择相比如何,以及(2)专家如何证明这些未来选择的优选性和可能性。该研究是基于德尔菲法:两轮匿名专家评价与控制反馈。我们确定了7种未来的管理方案:照常经营、农业复垦、碳林管理和4种森林管理方案。最可取的选择包括私营林业:由私人土地所有者管理的小规模林业和由公司管理的大规模工业林业。最不可取的选择是最有可能的:一切照旧——在未使用的、废弃的农田上种植非正式的、不受管制的森林。没有一种选择被评估为高度可取和高度可能的。以俄罗斯为例,我们得出结论,废弃农田利用政策可能会考虑将林业作为未来的管理选择。然而,将废弃农田转为林业可能会遇到法律和制度上的障碍,并引起争议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Land Use Policy
Land Use Policy ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
8.50%
发文量
553
期刊介绍: Land Use Policy is an international and interdisciplinary journal concerned with the social, economic, political, legal, physical and planning aspects of urban and rural land use. Land Use Policy examines issues in geography, agriculture, forestry, irrigation, environmental conservation, housing, urban development and transport in both developed and developing countries through major refereed articles and shorter viewpoint pieces.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信