Screening for Percutaneous Lung Cryoablation Adverse Event Risk: A Single Center Comparative Analysis to Surgical Risk Estimates.

Prisha Patel, Koustav Pal, Hadi Ahmed, Bill Tang, Iwan Paolucci, Mohammad Khavandi, Peiman Habibollahi, Ketan Shah, Steven Y Huang, Bruno C Odisio, Sanjay Gupta, Kamran Ahrar, Steven Yevich, Joshua D Kuban, Alda Tam, Rahul A Sheth
{"title":"Screening for Percutaneous Lung Cryoablation Adverse Event Risk: A Single Center Comparative Analysis to Surgical Risk Estimates.","authors":"Prisha Patel, Koustav Pal, Hadi Ahmed, Bill Tang, Iwan Paolucci, Mohammad Khavandi, Peiman Habibollahi, Ketan Shah, Steven Y Huang, Bruno C Odisio, Sanjay Gupta, Kamran Ahrar, Steven Yevich, Joshua D Kuban, Alda Tam, Rahul A Sheth","doi":"10.1016/j.jacr.2024.12.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the relevance of established surgical risk calculators (SRCs) for predicting complications in patients undergoing percutaneous lung cryoablation (PLC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The institution's database was queried for PLC procedures from March 2015 to May 2024, excluding those patients with concomitant local therapies or five or more lesions treated in a single setting. Demographics, frailty metrics as defined by the surgical literature, and procedural variables were collected. To evaluate the suitability of surgical risk estimate calculators, the requisite demographic data were input into the American College of Surgery SRC; estimates for length of stay (LOS), serious complications, 30-day readmission, and mortality were calculated to determine the comparative risk profile were the patients to have undergone surgical wedge resection instead of PLC. Additionally, to evaluate the suitability of imaging predictors of complications, the volume of emphysematous lung was calculated using a machine learning algorithm and incorporated into a generalized estimating equation logistic regression analysis of other demographic and technical variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 217 patients who underwent 314 procedures. Chest tubes were placed in 49% of procedures. The median LOS was 1 day (IQR: 1-1,range: 0-13). The median percentage of emphysema within the lungs was 5.9% (IQR: 2.4-12.1%, range: 0.01%-50.3%). The median predicted surgical rates for serious complications (13.5%), 30-day readmission (12%), and 30-day mortality (5.9%) were all greater than actual rates following PLC (1.6%, 4.8%, and 0.3%, respectively). The estimated surgical LOS differed significantly from the actual PLC LOS (5 vs. 1 days, p<.001). In univariable analysis, the number of probes the number of tumors ablated (OR 1.90, 95% CI [1.18, 3.05], p = 0.008), and the number of probes used (OR 1.44, 95% CI [1.06, 1.96], p = 0.021) were significantly associated with increased LOS, demographic and emphysema details were not.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Complications following PLC are significantly less frequent than the estimated complication risks for wedge resection in the same patient population. Risk estimate calculators tailored to PLC would help screen for high complication risks related to this procedure.</p>","PeriodicalId":73968,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2024.12.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the relevance of established surgical risk calculators (SRCs) for predicting complications in patients undergoing percutaneous lung cryoablation (PLC).

Methods: The institution's database was queried for PLC procedures from March 2015 to May 2024, excluding those patients with concomitant local therapies or five or more lesions treated in a single setting. Demographics, frailty metrics as defined by the surgical literature, and procedural variables were collected. To evaluate the suitability of surgical risk estimate calculators, the requisite demographic data were input into the American College of Surgery SRC; estimates for length of stay (LOS), serious complications, 30-day readmission, and mortality were calculated to determine the comparative risk profile were the patients to have undergone surgical wedge resection instead of PLC. Additionally, to evaluate the suitability of imaging predictors of complications, the volume of emphysematous lung was calculated using a machine learning algorithm and incorporated into a generalized estimating equation logistic regression analysis of other demographic and technical variables.

Results: The study included 217 patients who underwent 314 procedures. Chest tubes were placed in 49% of procedures. The median LOS was 1 day (IQR: 1-1,range: 0-13). The median percentage of emphysema within the lungs was 5.9% (IQR: 2.4-12.1%, range: 0.01%-50.3%). The median predicted surgical rates for serious complications (13.5%), 30-day readmission (12%), and 30-day mortality (5.9%) were all greater than actual rates following PLC (1.6%, 4.8%, and 0.3%, respectively). The estimated surgical LOS differed significantly from the actual PLC LOS (5 vs. 1 days, p<.001). In univariable analysis, the number of probes the number of tumors ablated (OR 1.90, 95% CI [1.18, 3.05], p = 0.008), and the number of probes used (OR 1.44, 95% CI [1.06, 1.96], p = 0.021) were significantly associated with increased LOS, demographic and emphysema details were not.

Conclusion: Complications following PLC are significantly less frequent than the estimated complication risks for wedge resection in the same patient population. Risk estimate calculators tailored to PLC would help screen for high complication risks related to this procedure.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信