Simone van den Bulk, Jasper W A van Egeraat, Annelieke H J Petrus, Mattijs E Numans, Tobias N Bonten
{"title":"Incidence of primary care chest pain consultations during the COVID-19 pandemic: an interrupted time series analysis with routine care data.","authors":"Simone van den Bulk, Jasper W A van Egeraat, Annelieke H J Petrus, Mattijs E Numans, Tobias N Bonten","doi":"10.1186/s12875-024-02676-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 lockdown had profound effects on society and healthcare. Cardiology departments reported declines in chest pain evaluations and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) diagnoses. However, the pattern of chest pain in primary care is not clear yet. This study aims to assess the impact of the COVID-19 lockdown on the number of patients presenting with chest pain in primary care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Routine primary care data from the Extramural LUMC (Leiden University Medical Center) Academic Network (ELAN) in the Netherlands were used. Chest pain consultations from January 2017 to December 2020 were included. An interrupted time series analysis was performed to compare the incidence rate (IR) of chest pain consultations during the COVID-19 lockdown to the expected IR. Secondary outcomes were the type of consultations, referral proportions, and the IR of registered ACS diagnoses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total 9,908 chest pain consultations were included. During the COVID-19 lockdown the IR was 6.16 per 1000 person-years while the expected IR was 7.55 (95% CI 7.03-8.12). The immediate effect of the lockdown yielded an incidence rate ratio (IRR) of 0.62 (95% CI 0.50-0.77). A similar decrease was seen for ACS diagnoses (IRR 0.62, 95% CI 0.48-0.79), with no compensatory increase after the lockdown (IRR 1.04, 95% CI 0.89-1.21). Face-to-face consultations shifted to telephone consultations (p < 0.001) and hospital referrals decreased (9.9% vs. 19.0% (p < 0.001)).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>During the COVID-19 lockdown the number of chest pain consultations and registered ACS diagnoses in primary care decreased significantly. In addition, fewer patients were assessed face-to-face and fewer patients were referred to the hospital.</p>","PeriodicalId":72428,"journal":{"name":"BMC primary care","volume":"25 1","pages":"433"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11662427/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC primary care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-024-02676-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The COVID-19 lockdown had profound effects on society and healthcare. Cardiology departments reported declines in chest pain evaluations and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) diagnoses. However, the pattern of chest pain in primary care is not clear yet. This study aims to assess the impact of the COVID-19 lockdown on the number of patients presenting with chest pain in primary care.
Methods: Routine primary care data from the Extramural LUMC (Leiden University Medical Center) Academic Network (ELAN) in the Netherlands were used. Chest pain consultations from January 2017 to December 2020 were included. An interrupted time series analysis was performed to compare the incidence rate (IR) of chest pain consultations during the COVID-19 lockdown to the expected IR. Secondary outcomes were the type of consultations, referral proportions, and the IR of registered ACS diagnoses.
Results: In total 9,908 chest pain consultations were included. During the COVID-19 lockdown the IR was 6.16 per 1000 person-years while the expected IR was 7.55 (95% CI 7.03-8.12). The immediate effect of the lockdown yielded an incidence rate ratio (IRR) of 0.62 (95% CI 0.50-0.77). A similar decrease was seen for ACS diagnoses (IRR 0.62, 95% CI 0.48-0.79), with no compensatory increase after the lockdown (IRR 1.04, 95% CI 0.89-1.21). Face-to-face consultations shifted to telephone consultations (p < 0.001) and hospital referrals decreased (9.9% vs. 19.0% (p < 0.001)).
Conclusions: During the COVID-19 lockdown the number of chest pain consultations and registered ACS diagnoses in primary care decreased significantly. In addition, fewer patients were assessed face-to-face and fewer patients were referred to the hospital.
背景:新冠肺炎疫情封锁对社会和医疗保健产生了深远影响。心脏病科报告胸痛评估和急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)诊断下降。然而,胸痛在初级保健中的模式尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估COVID-19封锁对初级保健中出现胸痛的患者数量的影响。方法:使用来自荷兰莱顿大学医学中心校外学术网络(ELAN)的常规初级保健数据。包括2017年1月至2020年12月的胸痛咨询。进行了中断时间序列分析,以比较COVID-19封锁期间胸痛咨询的发病率(IR)与预期IR。次要结果是咨询类型、转诊比例和注册ACS诊断的IR。结果:共纳入9908例胸痛咨询。在COVID-19封锁期间,IR为每1000人年6.16人,而预期IR为7.55人(95% CI 7.03-8.12)。封锁的直接影响导致发病率比(IRR)为0.62 (95% CI 0.50-0.77)。ACS诊断中也出现了类似的下降(IRR 0.62, 95% CI 0.48-0.79),封锁后没有代偿性增加(IRR 1.04, 95% CI 0.89-1.21)。结论:在COVID-19封锁期间,初级保健的胸痛咨询次数和登记的ACS诊断次数显着下降。此外,面对面评估的患者减少,转诊到医院的患者减少。