Exploration of the Fertility Decision-Making Experiences of Women of Reproductive Age With Cancer: A Qualitative Systematic Review.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Zitong Zhang, Yilin Zhang, Cai Deng, Wanting Zhang, Yunyun Peng, Guiyuan Ma, Sulan Lin, Carmen Wing Han Chan, Ka Ming Chow, Can Gu
{"title":"Exploration of the Fertility Decision-Making Experiences of Women of Reproductive Age With Cancer: A Qualitative Systematic Review.","authors":"Zitong Zhang, Yilin Zhang, Cai Deng, Wanting Zhang, Yunyun Peng, Guiyuan Ma, Sulan Lin, Carmen Wing Han Chan, Ka Ming Chow, Can Gu","doi":"10.1002/nur.22435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Women of reproductive age with cancer face unique considerations in terms of fertility. The related decision-making process is complicated, and insufficient support can lead to decisional conflict. The aim of this qualitative systematic review was to identify and integrate qualitative evidence regarding the fertility decision-making process of women of reproductive age undergoing treatment for cancer. A qualitative systematic review was conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute's methodology. Eight electronic databases were searched from inception to June 2023 for articles describing qualitative studies of the fertility decision-making process of women of reproductive age with cancer. Only original, full-text literature was examined, no limitation was placed on the publication language. Finally, 18 studies were included in a thematic analysis. We identified three analytical themes, namely \"Perceived changes in fertility,\" \"Influential participants in the decision-making process\" and \"Hard fertility decision-making processes of women,\" and nine descriptive themes that described the three analytical themes in detail. The results of qualitative synthesis emphasized that for women of reproductive age with cancer, fertility decision-making is a complex and dynamic process. These patients had experienced decisional conflict. Decision support from health care professionals was considered to be essential, and the use of patient decision aids in clinical settings was recommended. The synthesis results clarify women's fertility decision-making process, decision needs and the influencing factors, which offer evidence to guide the development of applicable patient decision aid tools to provide high-quality fertility services to women. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42023434490.</p>","PeriodicalId":54492,"journal":{"name":"Research in Nursing & Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Nursing & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.22435","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Women of reproductive age with cancer face unique considerations in terms of fertility. The related decision-making process is complicated, and insufficient support can lead to decisional conflict. The aim of this qualitative systematic review was to identify and integrate qualitative evidence regarding the fertility decision-making process of women of reproductive age undergoing treatment for cancer. A qualitative systematic review was conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute's methodology. Eight electronic databases were searched from inception to June 2023 for articles describing qualitative studies of the fertility decision-making process of women of reproductive age with cancer. Only original, full-text literature was examined, no limitation was placed on the publication language. Finally, 18 studies were included in a thematic analysis. We identified three analytical themes, namely "Perceived changes in fertility," "Influential participants in the decision-making process" and "Hard fertility decision-making processes of women," and nine descriptive themes that described the three analytical themes in detail. The results of qualitative synthesis emphasized that for women of reproductive age with cancer, fertility decision-making is a complex and dynamic process. These patients had experienced decisional conflict. Decision support from health care professionals was considered to be essential, and the use of patient decision aids in clinical settings was recommended. The synthesis results clarify women's fertility decision-making process, decision needs and the influencing factors, which offer evidence to guide the development of applicable patient decision aid tools to provide high-quality fertility services to women. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42023434490.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Research in Nursing & Health ( RINAH ) is a peer-reviewed general research journal devoted to publication of a wide range of research that will inform the practice of nursing and other health disciplines. The editors invite reports of research describing problems and testing interventions related to health phenomena, health care and self-care, clinical organization and administration; and the testing of research findings in practice. Research protocols are considered if funded in a peer-reviewed process by an agency external to the authors’ home institution and if the work is in progress. Papers on research methods and techniques are appropriate if they go beyond what is already generally available in the literature and include description of successful use of the method. Theory papers are accepted if each proposition is supported by research evidence. Systematic reviews of the literature are reviewed if PRISMA guidelines are followed. Letters to the editor commenting on published articles are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信