Modeling the fasting blood glucose response to basal insulin adjustment in type 2 diabetes: An explainable machine learning approach on real-world data

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Camilla Heisel Nyholm Thomsen , Thomas Kronborg , Stine Hangaard , Peter Vestergaard , Ole Hejlesen , Morten Hasselstrøm Jensen
{"title":"Modeling the fasting blood glucose response to basal insulin adjustment in type 2 diabetes: An explainable machine learning approach on real-world data","authors":"Camilla Heisel Nyholm Thomsen ,&nbsp;Thomas Kronborg ,&nbsp;Stine Hangaard ,&nbsp;Peter Vestergaard ,&nbsp;Ole Hejlesen ,&nbsp;Morten Hasselstrøm Jensen","doi":"10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Optimal basal insulin titration for people with type 2 diabetes is vital to effectively reducing the risk of complications. However, a sizeable proportion of people (30–50 %) remain in suboptimal glycemic control six months post-initiation of basal insulin. This indicates a clear need for novel titration methods that account for individual patient variability in real-world settings.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aims to investigate the use of real-world data and explainable machine learning in modeling fasting glucose responses to basal insulin adjustments, focusing on identifying factors influencing fasting glucose variability.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A three-step explanatory approach was used to develop models using multiple linear regression, forward feature selection, and three-fold cross-validation. The models were built progressively, starting with a baseline model incorporating fasting blood glucose and insulin dose adjustments, followed by iterative models that in turn included biometric data, social factors, and biochemistry data, and lastly, a comprehensive model without constraints on the feature pool.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The baseline model yielded an average root mean squared error (RMSE) of 1.52 [95% CI: 1.33–1.71]. The iterative models resulted in an average RMSE of 1.49 [95% CI: 1.35–1.62] (biometric data), 1.47 [95% CI: 1.36–1.58] (social factors), and 1.52 [95% CI: 1.34–1.70] (biochemistry data). The comprehensive model yielded an average RMSE of 1.44 [95% CI: 1.41–1.48].</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Developing explainable machine learning models using real-world data is possible for basal insulin titration. However, model performance is influenced by data’s ability to capture everyday behavior, underscoring the need for incorporating more detailed behavioral and social data to optimize future titration models.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54950,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Informatics","volume":"195 ","pages":"Article 105758"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386505624004210","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Optimal basal insulin titration for people with type 2 diabetes is vital to effectively reducing the risk of complications. However, a sizeable proportion of people (30–50 %) remain in suboptimal glycemic control six months post-initiation of basal insulin. This indicates a clear need for novel titration methods that account for individual patient variability in real-world settings.

Objective

This study aims to investigate the use of real-world data and explainable machine learning in modeling fasting glucose responses to basal insulin adjustments, focusing on identifying factors influencing fasting glucose variability.

Methods

A three-step explanatory approach was used to develop models using multiple linear regression, forward feature selection, and three-fold cross-validation. The models were built progressively, starting with a baseline model incorporating fasting blood glucose and insulin dose adjustments, followed by iterative models that in turn included biometric data, social factors, and biochemistry data, and lastly, a comprehensive model without constraints on the feature pool.

Results

The baseline model yielded an average root mean squared error (RMSE) of 1.52 [95% CI: 1.33–1.71]. The iterative models resulted in an average RMSE of 1.49 [95% CI: 1.35–1.62] (biometric data), 1.47 [95% CI: 1.36–1.58] (social factors), and 1.52 [95% CI: 1.34–1.70] (biochemistry data). The comprehensive model yielded an average RMSE of 1.44 [95% CI: 1.41–1.48].

Conclusion

Developing explainable machine learning models using real-world data is possible for basal insulin titration. However, model performance is influenced by data’s ability to capture everyday behavior, underscoring the need for incorporating more detailed behavioral and social data to optimize future titration models.
2型糖尿病空腹血糖对基础胰岛素调节的反应建模:基于真实世界数据的可解释的机器学习方法
2型糖尿病患者的最佳基础胰岛素滴定对于有效降低并发症的风险至关重要。然而,相当大比例的人(30- 50%)在开始基础胰岛素治疗6个月后血糖控制仍处于次优状态。这表明明确需要新的滴定方法来考虑现实环境中个体患者的可变性。目的:本研究旨在探讨使用真实世界数据和可解释的机器学习来模拟空腹血糖对基础胰岛素调节的反应,重点是确定影响空腹血糖变异性的因素。方法:采用三步解释方法,利用多元线性回归、正向特征选择和三重交叉验证建立模型。这些模型是逐步建立的,首先是一个包含空腹血糖和胰岛素剂量调整的基线模型,然后是包括生物特征数据、社会因素和生物化学数据的迭代模型,最后是一个不受特征库约束的综合模型。结果:基线模型的平均均方根误差(RMSE)为1.52 [95% CI: 1.33-1.71]。迭代模型的平均RMSE为1.49 [95% CI: 1.35-1.62](生物特征数据),1.47 [95% CI: 1.36-1.58](社会因素)和1.52 [95% CI: 1.34-1.70](生物化学数据)。综合模型的平均RMSE为1.44 [95% CI: 1.41-1.48]。结论:利用真实世界的数据开发可解释的机器学习模型是可能的基础胰岛素滴定。然而,模型的性能受到数据捕捉日常行为的能力的影响,强调需要纳入更详细的行为和社会数据来优化未来的滴定模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Medical Informatics
International Journal of Medical Informatics 医学-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
4.10%
发文量
217
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: International Journal of Medical Informatics provides an international medium for dissemination of original results and interpretative reviews concerning the field of medical informatics. The Journal emphasizes the evaluation of systems in healthcare settings. The scope of journal covers: Information systems, including national or international registration systems, hospital information systems, departmental and/or physician''s office systems, document handling systems, electronic medical record systems, standardization, systems integration etc.; Computer-aided medical decision support systems using heuristic, algorithmic and/or statistical methods as exemplified in decision theory, protocol development, artificial intelligence, etc. Educational computer based programs pertaining to medical informatics or medicine in general; Organizational, economic, social, clinical impact, ethical and cost-benefit aspects of IT applications in health care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信