Oreste Iocca, Chiara Copelli, Flaminia Campo, Gerardo Petruzzi, Raul Pellini, Guglielmo Ramieri, Pasquale Di Maio
{"title":"Lymph node ratio (LNR) and lymph node yield (LNY) in head and neck cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Oreste Iocca, Chiara Copelli, Flaminia Campo, Gerardo Petruzzi, Raul Pellini, Guglielmo Ramieri, Pasquale Di Maio","doi":"10.1016/j.jcms.2024.11.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A growing amount of evidence points at lymph node yield (LNY) and lymph node ratio (LNR) as useful indicators in the prognostic evaluation of patients affected by head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) who require neck dissection. The aim of this study was to assess the importance of LNY and LNR in the prognostic evaluation of head and neck cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Included studies were those examining LNY and/or LNR in head and neck cancer patients. We excluded case reports or case series, thyroid cancer or salivary gland cancer studies, a sample size less than 20, and studies with incomplete or missing survival estimate. Of the 2435 studies identified through a database search, 95 were reviewed for full text and 63 were finally included for the final analysis. Electronic databases, including PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, and Scopus were screened up to January 1, 2024. The systematic review was conducted according to the MOOSE checklist. A set of sub-group meta-analyses were performed for oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, larynx, and mixed subsites using a random-effects model. Overall survival (OS), Disease Specific Survival (DSS), and Disease-Free Survival (DFS) Hazard Ratios (HR) related to a prespecified LNR and LNY exact value were chosen as summary statistics. Cumulative Hazard Ratios with 95% Confidence Interval (CI) were presented, calculated through the inverse variance method. Heterogeneity was evaluated with I<sup>2</sup> statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results of the meta-analysis showed increased OS for a higher LNY (HR 1.33 95% CI 1.23-1.45). Regarding the LNR, a lower LNR value has an impact on survival, with an OS HR of 1.96 (95% CI 1.72-2.24). The same was true for DFS (HR 2.43 95% CI 1.82-3.23), and DSS (HR 2.07 95% CI 1.83-2.33).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our analysis confirms the importance of LNY and LNR as prognostic indicators. Future studies are needed to establish the optimal cut-off values for both factors. LNY and LNR have the potential to be routinely evaluated in patients who undergo neck dissection for HNSCC.</p>","PeriodicalId":54851,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2024.11.016","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: A growing amount of evidence points at lymph node yield (LNY) and lymph node ratio (LNR) as useful indicators in the prognostic evaluation of patients affected by head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) who require neck dissection. The aim of this study was to assess the importance of LNY and LNR in the prognostic evaluation of head and neck cancer patients.
Materials and methods: Included studies were those examining LNY and/or LNR in head and neck cancer patients. We excluded case reports or case series, thyroid cancer or salivary gland cancer studies, a sample size less than 20, and studies with incomplete or missing survival estimate. Of the 2435 studies identified through a database search, 95 were reviewed for full text and 63 were finally included for the final analysis. Electronic databases, including PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, and Scopus were screened up to January 1, 2024. The systematic review was conducted according to the MOOSE checklist. A set of sub-group meta-analyses were performed for oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, larynx, and mixed subsites using a random-effects model. Overall survival (OS), Disease Specific Survival (DSS), and Disease-Free Survival (DFS) Hazard Ratios (HR) related to a prespecified LNR and LNY exact value were chosen as summary statistics. Cumulative Hazard Ratios with 95% Confidence Interval (CI) were presented, calculated through the inverse variance method. Heterogeneity was evaluated with I2 statistics.
Results: Results of the meta-analysis showed increased OS for a higher LNY (HR 1.33 95% CI 1.23-1.45). Regarding the LNR, a lower LNR value has an impact on survival, with an OS HR of 1.96 (95% CI 1.72-2.24). The same was true for DFS (HR 2.43 95% CI 1.82-3.23), and DSS (HR 2.07 95% CI 1.83-2.33).
Conclusions: Our analysis confirms the importance of LNY and LNR as prognostic indicators. Future studies are needed to establish the optimal cut-off values for both factors. LNY and LNR have the potential to be routinely evaluated in patients who undergo neck dissection for HNSCC.
越来越多的证据表明,淋巴结生成量(LNY)和淋巴结比例(LNR)是评估需要进行颈部清扫的头颈部鳞状细胞癌(HNSCC)患者预后的有用指标。本研究的目的是评估LNY和LNR在头颈癌患者预后评估中的重要性。材料和方法:纳入了头颈癌患者LNY和/或LNR的研究。我们排除了病例报告或病例系列、甲状腺癌或唾液腺癌研究、样本量小于20的研究以及生存估计不完整或缺失的研究。在通过数据库检索确定的2435项研究中,95项被全文审查,63项最终被纳入最终分析。包括PubMed (MEDLINE)、Embase和Scopus在内的电子数据库被筛选至2024年1月1日。根据MOOSE检查表进行系统评价。采用随机效应模型对口腔、口咽部、下咽、喉部和混合亚部位进行了一组亚组荟萃分析。选择与预先设定的LNR和LNY精确值相关的总生存期(OS)、疾病特异性生存期(DSS)和无病生存期(DFS)风险比(HR)作为汇总统计。通过反方差法计算得出具有95%置信区间(CI)的累积风险比。采用I2统计量评价异质性。结果:meta分析结果显示,LNY越高,OS越高(HR 1.33, 95% CI 1.23-1.45)。关于LNR,较低的LNR值对生存有影响,其OS HR为1.96 (95% CI 1.72-2.24)。DFS (HR 2.43 95% CI 1.82-3.23)和DSS (HR 2.07 95% CI 1.83-2.33)也是如此。结论:我们的分析证实了LNY和LNR作为预后指标的重要性。需要进一步的研究来确定这两个因素的最佳临界值。LNY和LNR有可能在接受颈部清扫术的HNSCC患者中进行常规评估。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery publishes articles covering all aspects of surgery of the head, face and jaw. Specific topics covered recently have included:
• Distraction osteogenesis
• Synthetic bone substitutes
• Fibroblast growth factors
• Fetal wound healing
• Skull base surgery
• Computer-assisted surgery
• Vascularized bone grafts