Application of large language models in clinical record correction: a comprehensive study on various retraining methods.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Ana M Maitin, Alberto Nogales, Sergio Fernández-Rincón, Enrique Aranguren, Emilio Cervera-Barba, Sophia Denizon-Arranz, Alonso Mateos-Rodríguez, Álvaro J García-Tejedor
{"title":"Application of large language models in clinical record correction: a comprehensive study on various retraining methods.","authors":"Ana M Maitin, Alberto Nogales, Sergio Fernández-Rincón, Enrique Aranguren, Emilio Cervera-Barba, Sophia Denizon-Arranz, Alonso Mateos-Rodríguez, Álvaro J García-Tejedor","doi":"10.1093/jamia/ocae302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We evaluate the effectiveness of large language models (LLMs), specifically GPT-based (GPT-3.5 and GPT-4) and Llama-2 models (13B and 7B architectures), in autonomously assessing clinical records (CRs) to enhance medical education and diagnostic skills.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Various techniques, including prompt engineering, fine-tuning (FT), and low-rank adaptation (LoRA), were implemented and compared on Llama-2 7B. These methods were assessed using prompts in both English and Spanish to determine their adaptability to different languages. Performance was benchmarked against GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and Llama-2 13B.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>GPT-based models, particularly GPT-4, demonstrated promising performance closely aligned with specialist evaluations. Application of FT on Llama-2 7B improved text comprehension in Spanish, equating its performance to that of Llama-2 13B with English prompts. Low-rank adaptation significantly enhanced performance, surpassing GPT-3.5 results when combined with FT. This indicates LoRA's effectiveness in adapting open-source models for specific tasks.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>While GPT-4 showed superior performance, FT and LoRA on Llama-2 7B proved crucial in improving language comprehension and task-specific accuracy. Identified limitations highlight the need for further research.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study underscores the potential of LLMs in medical education, providing an innovative, effective approach to CR correction. Low-rank adaptation emerged as the most effective technique, enabling open-source models to perform on par with proprietary models. Future research should focus on overcoming current limitations to further improve model performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":50016,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocae302","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: We evaluate the effectiveness of large language models (LLMs), specifically GPT-based (GPT-3.5 and GPT-4) and Llama-2 models (13B and 7B architectures), in autonomously assessing clinical records (CRs) to enhance medical education and diagnostic skills.

Materials and methods: Various techniques, including prompt engineering, fine-tuning (FT), and low-rank adaptation (LoRA), were implemented and compared on Llama-2 7B. These methods were assessed using prompts in both English and Spanish to determine their adaptability to different languages. Performance was benchmarked against GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and Llama-2 13B.

Results: GPT-based models, particularly GPT-4, demonstrated promising performance closely aligned with specialist evaluations. Application of FT on Llama-2 7B improved text comprehension in Spanish, equating its performance to that of Llama-2 13B with English prompts. Low-rank adaptation significantly enhanced performance, surpassing GPT-3.5 results when combined with FT. This indicates LoRA's effectiveness in adapting open-source models for specific tasks.

Discussion: While GPT-4 showed superior performance, FT and LoRA on Llama-2 7B proved crucial in improving language comprehension and task-specific accuracy. Identified limitations highlight the need for further research.

Conclusion: This study underscores the potential of LLMs in medical education, providing an innovative, effective approach to CR correction. Low-rank adaptation emerged as the most effective technique, enabling open-source models to perform on par with proprietary models. Future research should focus on overcoming current limitations to further improve model performance.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 医学-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
7.80%
发文量
230
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMIA is AMIA''s premier peer-reviewed journal for biomedical and health informatics. Covering the full spectrum of activities in the field, JAMIA includes informatics articles in the areas of clinical care, clinical research, translational science, implementation science, imaging, education, consumer health, public health, and policy. JAMIA''s articles describe innovative informatics research and systems that help to advance biomedical science and to promote health. Case reports, perspectives and reviews also help readers stay connected with the most important informatics developments in implementation, policy and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信