Cardiovascular events in patients with gout initiating urate-lowering therapy with or without colchicine for flare prophylaxis: a retrospective new-user cohort study using linked primary care, hospitalisation, and mortality data.
Edoardo Cipolletta, Georgina Nakafero, Natalie McCormick, Chio Yokose, Anthony J Avery, Mamas A Mamas, Hyon K Choi, Laila J Tata, Abhishek Abhishek
{"title":"Cardiovascular events in patients with gout initiating urate-lowering therapy with or without colchicine for flare prophylaxis: a retrospective new-user cohort study using linked primary care, hospitalisation, and mortality data.","authors":"Edoardo Cipolletta, Georgina Nakafero, Natalie McCormick, Chio Yokose, Anthony J Avery, Mamas A Mamas, Hyon K Choi, Laila J Tata, Abhishek Abhishek","doi":"10.1016/S2665-9913(24)00248-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Initiating urate-lowering therapy can trigger gout flares. Gout flares have been associated with a temporally increased risk of cardiovascular events. Therefore, we aimed to estimate the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with gout initiating urate-lowering therapy with flare prophylaxis using colchicine (the drug recommended for gout flare prohphylaxis by many international societies) compared with no prophylaxis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We did a retrospective new-user cohort study using data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum, an English primary-care database linked to hospitalisation and mortality records. People with gout initiating urate-lowering therapy for the first time were eligible for inclusion. We compared people prescribed flare prophylaxis with colchicine with those not prescribed any gout flare prophylaxis. Colchicine prophylaxis (defined as prescription for ≥21 days) prescribed on the same date as urate-lowering therapy was the exposure of interest. A composite of fatal and non-fatal myocardial infarction or stroke within 180 days after urate-lowering therapy initiation regardless of any previous cardiovascular event was the primary outcome. Propensity score overlap weighting was used to balance covariates across study groups. We used Cox regression and performed intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses, the latter with an inverse probability of censoring weighting. The association was measured using hazard ratio and risk difference with 95% CIs. Members of The UK Gout Society were involved in prioritising the research question.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Of the 111 460 patients eligible for the study, 99 800 patients with gout initiating urate-lowering therapy were included. 25 511 (25·6%) of 99 800 patients were female, 74 289 (74·4%) were male, 84 928 (85·1%) patients were White and the mean age was 62·8 years (SD 15·5). 4063 (4·1%) patients had previous cardiovascular events and 16 028 (16·1%) patients were prescribed colchicine prophylaxis. Patients with colchicine prophylaxis had significantly lower risk of cardiovascular events compared with those without prophylaxis. The weighted rates of cardiovascular events were 28·8 per 1000 person-years (95% CI 25·2 to 33·2) in patients with colchicine prophylaxis and 35·3 per 1000 person-years (33·0 to 37·9) in those without prophylaxis (weighted rate difference -6·5 [95% CI -9·4 to -3·6] per 1000 person-years and weighted hazard ratio 0·82 [0·69-0·94]) in the intention-to-treat analysis. Findings were similar across analytical approaches, stratified analyses, and for secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>In patients with gout initiating urate-lowering therapy, the risk of cardiovascular events was reduced in those prescribed colchicine prophylaxis compared with no prophylaxis. These findings provide an additional argument for using colchicine for gout flare prophylaxis.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Foundation for Research in Rheumatology.</p>","PeriodicalId":48540,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":15.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2665-9913(24)00248-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Initiating urate-lowering therapy can trigger gout flares. Gout flares have been associated with a temporally increased risk of cardiovascular events. Therefore, we aimed to estimate the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with gout initiating urate-lowering therapy with flare prophylaxis using colchicine (the drug recommended for gout flare prohphylaxis by many international societies) compared with no prophylaxis.
Methods: We did a retrospective new-user cohort study using data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum, an English primary-care database linked to hospitalisation and mortality records. People with gout initiating urate-lowering therapy for the first time were eligible for inclusion. We compared people prescribed flare prophylaxis with colchicine with those not prescribed any gout flare prophylaxis. Colchicine prophylaxis (defined as prescription for ≥21 days) prescribed on the same date as urate-lowering therapy was the exposure of interest. A composite of fatal and non-fatal myocardial infarction or stroke within 180 days after urate-lowering therapy initiation regardless of any previous cardiovascular event was the primary outcome. Propensity score overlap weighting was used to balance covariates across study groups. We used Cox regression and performed intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses, the latter with an inverse probability of censoring weighting. The association was measured using hazard ratio and risk difference with 95% CIs. Members of The UK Gout Society were involved in prioritising the research question.
Findings: Of the 111 460 patients eligible for the study, 99 800 patients with gout initiating urate-lowering therapy were included. 25 511 (25·6%) of 99 800 patients were female, 74 289 (74·4%) were male, 84 928 (85·1%) patients were White and the mean age was 62·8 years (SD 15·5). 4063 (4·1%) patients had previous cardiovascular events and 16 028 (16·1%) patients were prescribed colchicine prophylaxis. Patients with colchicine prophylaxis had significantly lower risk of cardiovascular events compared with those without prophylaxis. The weighted rates of cardiovascular events were 28·8 per 1000 person-years (95% CI 25·2 to 33·2) in patients with colchicine prophylaxis and 35·3 per 1000 person-years (33·0 to 37·9) in those without prophylaxis (weighted rate difference -6·5 [95% CI -9·4 to -3·6] per 1000 person-years and weighted hazard ratio 0·82 [0·69-0·94]) in the intention-to-treat analysis. Findings were similar across analytical approaches, stratified analyses, and for secondary outcomes.
Interpretation: In patients with gout initiating urate-lowering therapy, the risk of cardiovascular events was reduced in those prescribed colchicine prophylaxis compared with no prophylaxis. These findings provide an additional argument for using colchicine for gout flare prophylaxis.
期刊介绍:
The Lancet Rheumatology, an independent journal, is dedicated to publishing content relevant to rheumatology specialists worldwide. It focuses on studies that advance clinical practice, challenge existing norms, and advocate for changes in health policy. The journal covers clinical research, particularly clinical trials, expert reviews, and thought-provoking commentary on the diagnosis, classification, management, and prevention of rheumatic diseases, including arthritis, musculoskeletal disorders, connective tissue diseases, and immune system disorders. Additionally, it publishes high-quality translational studies supported by robust clinical data, prioritizing those that identify potential new therapeutic targets, advance precision medicine efforts, or directly contribute to future clinical trials.
With its strong clinical orientation, The Lancet Rheumatology serves as an independent voice for the rheumatology community, advocating strongly for the enhancement of patients' lives affected by rheumatic diseases worldwide.