Decrease in provider stigma is associated with improved quality health indicators among individuals receiving methadone in primary care centers in Ukraine

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Eteri Machavariani , Daniel J. Bromberg , Kostyantyn Dumchev , Denise Esserman , Valerie A. Earnshaw , Iryna Pykalo , Myroslava Filippovich , Roman Ivasiy , Bachar Ahmad , Jiang Long , Marwan S. Haddad , Lynn M. Madden , David Oliveros , Sergii Dvoriak , Frederick L. Altice
{"title":"Decrease in provider stigma is associated with improved quality health indicators among individuals receiving methadone in primary care centers in Ukraine","authors":"Eteri Machavariani ,&nbsp;Daniel J. Bromberg ,&nbsp;Kostyantyn Dumchev ,&nbsp;Denise Esserman ,&nbsp;Valerie A. Earnshaw ,&nbsp;Iryna Pykalo ,&nbsp;Myroslava Filippovich ,&nbsp;Roman Ivasiy ,&nbsp;Bachar Ahmad ,&nbsp;Jiang Long ,&nbsp;Marwan S. Haddad ,&nbsp;Lynn M. Madden ,&nbsp;David Oliveros ,&nbsp;Sergii Dvoriak ,&nbsp;Frederick L. Altice","doi":"10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>People who inject drugs experience poor health and social outcomes which improve with opioid agonist therapies like methadone, yet provider stigma may influence healthcare utilization. In Ukraine, integrating methadone into primary care centers (PCCs) provides an opportunity to examine provider stigma and its impact on patient outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This sub-analysis included patients randomized to receive methadone in PCCs as part of an implementation trial in which the control group received methadone in specialty addiction clinics in Ukraine. Methadone integration in PCCs was supported through continuous tele-education for providers. Provider stigma towards people who inject drugs, methadone, and attitudes towards evidence-based practices were assessed at baseline, 12, and 24 months using standardized scales (range 1–10). Patient-level outcomes were measured bi-annually over 24 months using a quality health indicator (QHI) score, a percentage of guideline-concordant primary and specialty health services accessed. Linear mixed-effects models examined the changes in provider stigma and attitudes, and the association of these measures with patient outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The sample included 583 patients and the 112 providers in 24 clinics. Provider fear and stereotypes toward people who inject drugs improved significantly, by 0.6 (95 % CI 0.2–1.1) and 0.4 points (95 % CI 0.1–0.8), respectively, as did preference for methadone over abstinence-based treatment (0.7 points, 95 % CI 0.2–1.1). A 1-point improvement in provider prejudice correlated with a 7.0-point increase (95 % CI: 1.1–13.0) in patient primary care QHI scores at 12 months, while improved attitudes towards evidence-based practices were associated with an 8.3-point increase (95 % CI: 1.1–13.0). Preference for methadone maintenance over abstinence was associated with a 3.7-point increase (95 % CI: 0.6–6.7) in specialty care QHI scores at 12 months, and reduced stereotypes were associated with a 10.9-point increase (95 % CI: 1.2–20.7) at 24 months.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Integrating methadone into PCCs with the support of provider tele-education may reduce provider stigma, particularly fear and stereotypes, toward people who inject drugs and methadone maintenance. Reducing provider stigma has the potential to improve patient outcomes through increased access to preventive care and screenings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48364,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Drug Policy","volume":"136 ","pages":"Article 104682"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Drug Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955395924003669","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

People who inject drugs experience poor health and social outcomes which improve with opioid agonist therapies like methadone, yet provider stigma may influence healthcare utilization. In Ukraine, integrating methadone into primary care centers (PCCs) provides an opportunity to examine provider stigma and its impact on patient outcomes.

Methods

This sub-analysis included patients randomized to receive methadone in PCCs as part of an implementation trial in which the control group received methadone in specialty addiction clinics in Ukraine. Methadone integration in PCCs was supported through continuous tele-education for providers. Provider stigma towards people who inject drugs, methadone, and attitudes towards evidence-based practices were assessed at baseline, 12, and 24 months using standardized scales (range 1–10). Patient-level outcomes were measured bi-annually over 24 months using a quality health indicator (QHI) score, a percentage of guideline-concordant primary and specialty health services accessed. Linear mixed-effects models examined the changes in provider stigma and attitudes, and the association of these measures with patient outcomes.

Results

The sample included 583 patients and the 112 providers in 24 clinics. Provider fear and stereotypes toward people who inject drugs improved significantly, by 0.6 (95 % CI 0.2–1.1) and 0.4 points (95 % CI 0.1–0.8), respectively, as did preference for methadone over abstinence-based treatment (0.7 points, 95 % CI 0.2–1.1). A 1-point improvement in provider prejudice correlated with a 7.0-point increase (95 % CI: 1.1–13.0) in patient primary care QHI scores at 12 months, while improved attitudes towards evidence-based practices were associated with an 8.3-point increase (95 % CI: 1.1–13.0). Preference for methadone maintenance over abstinence was associated with a 3.7-point increase (95 % CI: 0.6–6.7) in specialty care QHI scores at 12 months, and reduced stereotypes were associated with a 10.9-point increase (95 % CI: 1.2–20.7) at 24 months.

Conclusions

Integrating methadone into PCCs with the support of provider tele-education may reduce provider stigma, particularly fear and stereotypes, toward people who inject drugs and methadone maintenance. Reducing provider stigma has the potential to improve patient outcomes through increased access to preventive care and screenings.
在乌克兰的初级保健中心接受美沙酮治疗的个人中,提供者耻辱的减少与质量健康指标的提高有关。
简介:注射吸毒者的健康状况和社会结果较差,通过美沙酮等阿片类激动剂治疗可以改善,但提供者的耻辱感可能影响医疗保健的利用。在乌克兰,将美沙酮纳入初级保健中心(PCCs)提供了一个机会来检查提供者耻辱及其对患者预后的影响。方法:该亚分析纳入了随机接受美沙酮治疗的患者,作为实施试验的一部分,对照组在乌克兰的专业成瘾诊所接受美沙酮治疗。通过对提供者的持续远程教育,支持将美沙酮纳入PCCs。使用标准化量表(范围1-10)在基线、12个月和24个月评估提供者对注射毒品、美沙酮者的污名以及对循证做法的态度。使用质量健康指标(QHI)评分,即获得符合指南的初级和专业卫生服务的百分比,每两年测量一次患者水平的结果,超过24个月。线性混合效应模型检查了提供者污名和态度的变化,以及这些措施与患者结果的关联。结果:样本包括24个诊所的583名患者和112名医护人员。提供者对注射吸毒者的恐惧和刻板印象显著改善,分别提高了0.6点(95% CI 0.2-1.1)和0.4点(95% CI 0.1-0.8),对美沙酮的偏好优于戒断治疗(0.7点,95% CI 0.2-1.1)。提供者偏见1分的改善与患者初级保健QHI评分在12个月时增加7.0分相关(95% CI: 1.1-13.0),而对循证实践态度的改善与8.3分的增加相关(95% CI: 1.1-13.0)。在12个月时,对美沙酮维持的偏好与专科护理QHI评分增加3.7分(95% CI: 0.6-6.7)相关,在24个月时,刻板印象的减少与10.9分的增加相关(95% CI: 1.2-20.7)。结论:在提供者远程教育的支持下,将美沙酮纳入公立医院可以减少提供者对注射毒品和美沙酮维持者的耻辱感,特别是恐惧和刻板印象。减少提供者的耻辱感有可能通过增加获得预防性保健和筛查的机会来改善患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
11.40%
发文量
307
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Drug Policy provides a forum for the dissemination of current research, reviews, debate, and critical analysis on drug use and drug policy in a global context. It seeks to publish material on the social, political, legal, and health contexts of psychoactive substance use, both licit and illicit. The journal is particularly concerned to explore the effects of drug policy and practice on drug-using behaviour and its health and social consequences. It is the policy of the journal to represent a wide range of material on drug-related matters from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信