Risks of grade reclassification among patients with Gleason grade group 1 prostate cancer and PI-RADS 5 findings on prostate MRI.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Vinaik Mootha Sundaresan, Lindsey Webb, Maximilian Rabil, Aleksandra Golos, Ryan Sutherland, Jonell Bailey, Pawel Rajwa, Tyler M Seibert, Stacy Loeb, Matthew R Cooperberg, William J Catalona, Preston C Sprenkle, Isaac Y Kim, Michael S Leapman
{"title":"Risks of grade reclassification among patients with Gleason grade group 1 prostate cancer and PI-RADS 5 findings on prostate MRI.","authors":"Vinaik Mootha Sundaresan, Lindsey Webb, Maximilian Rabil, Aleksandra Golos, Ryan Sutherland, Jonell Bailey, Pawel Rajwa, Tyler M Seibert, Stacy Loeb, Matthew R Cooperberg, William J Catalona, Preston C Sprenkle, Isaac Y Kim, Michael S Leapman","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.11.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>As most Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 5 lesions on MRI harbor Gleason grade (GG) group ≥2 disease on biopsy, optimal management of patients with imaging-biopsy discordance remains unclear. To estimate grade misclassification, we evaluated the incidence of Gleason upgrading among patients with GG1 disease in the setting of a PI-RADS 5 lesion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a single-institution retrospective analysis to identify patients with GG1 prostate cancer on fusion biopsy with MRI demonstrating ≥1 PI-RADS 5 lesion. Primary study outcome was identification of ≥GG2 disease on subsequent active surveillance (AS) biopsy or radical prostatectomy (RP). We used multivariable models to examine factors associated with reclassification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 110 patients with GG1 disease on initial biopsy and ≥1 PI-RADS 5 lesion. There were 104 patients (94.6%) initially managed with AS and 6 (5.5%) received treatment. Sixty-one patients (58.7%) on AS underwent additional biopsies. Of these, 43 (70.5%) patients had tumor upgrading, with 32 (74.4%) upgraded on first surveillance biopsy. Forty-four (40%) patients ultimately received treatment, including prostatectomy in 15 (13.6%) and radiation in 25 (22.7%). Two patients (1.8%) developed metastases. In multivariable models, genomic classifier score was associated with upgrading. Limitations include a lack of multi-institutional data and long-term outcomes data.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most patients diagnosed with GG1 prostate cancer on MRI-Ultrasound fusion biopsy in the setting of a PI-RADS 5 lesion were found to have ≥GG2 disease on subsequent tissue sampling, suggesting substantial initial misclassification and reinforcing the need for confirmatory testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.11.007","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: As most Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 5 lesions on MRI harbor Gleason grade (GG) group ≥2 disease on biopsy, optimal management of patients with imaging-biopsy discordance remains unclear. To estimate grade misclassification, we evaluated the incidence of Gleason upgrading among patients with GG1 disease in the setting of a PI-RADS 5 lesion.

Methods: We conducted a single-institution retrospective analysis to identify patients with GG1 prostate cancer on fusion biopsy with MRI demonstrating ≥1 PI-RADS 5 lesion. Primary study outcome was identification of ≥GG2 disease on subsequent active surveillance (AS) biopsy or radical prostatectomy (RP). We used multivariable models to examine factors associated with reclassification.

Results: We identified 110 patients with GG1 disease on initial biopsy and ≥1 PI-RADS 5 lesion. There were 104 patients (94.6%) initially managed with AS and 6 (5.5%) received treatment. Sixty-one patients (58.7%) on AS underwent additional biopsies. Of these, 43 (70.5%) patients had tumor upgrading, with 32 (74.4%) upgraded on first surveillance biopsy. Forty-four (40%) patients ultimately received treatment, including prostatectomy in 15 (13.6%) and radiation in 25 (22.7%). Two patients (1.8%) developed metastases. In multivariable models, genomic classifier score was associated with upgrading. Limitations include a lack of multi-institutional data and long-term outcomes data.

Conclusions: Most patients diagnosed with GG1 prostate cancer on MRI-Ultrasound fusion biopsy in the setting of a PI-RADS 5 lesion were found to have ≥GG2 disease on subsequent tissue sampling, suggesting substantial initial misclassification and reinforcing the need for confirmatory testing.

Gleason分级1组前列腺癌患者重分级的风险及前列腺MRI PI-RADS 5表现
背景与目的:由于大多数前列腺影像学报告与数据系统(PI-RADS) 5级MRI病变活检显示为Gleason分级(GG)组≥2级病变,因此影像学与活检不一致患者的最佳处理尚不清楚。为了估计分级错误,我们评估了PI-RADS 5病变情况下GG1疾病患者Gleason升级的发生率。方法:我们进行了一项单机构回顾性分析,对MRI显示PI-RADS 5≥1病变的GG1前列腺癌患者进行融合活检。主要研究结果是在随后的主动监测(AS)活检或根治性前列腺切除术(RP)中识别≥GG2疾病。我们使用多变量模型来检验与重分类相关的因素。结果:我们在初始活检中确定了110例GG1疾病和≥1个PI-RADS 5病变。104例患者(94.6%)最初接受了AS治疗,6例(5.5%)接受了治疗。61例(58.7%)AS患者接受了额外的活检。其中,43例(70.5%)患者肿瘤升级,32例(74.4%)患者首次监测活检时肿瘤升级。44例(40%)患者最终接受了治疗,包括15例前列腺切除术(13.6%)和25例放疗(22.7%)。2例(1.8%)发生转移。在多变量模型中,基因组分类器评分与升级相关。局限性包括缺乏多机构数据和长期结果数据。结论:在PI-RADS 5病变背景下,大多数mri超声融合活检诊断为GG1前列腺癌的患者在随后的组织采样中发现GG2≥,这表明大量的初始错误分类,并加强了确认性检查的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
7.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations is the official journal of the Society of Urologic Oncology. The journal publishes practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science research articles which address any aspect of urologic oncology. Each issue comprises original research, news and topics, survey articles providing short commentaries on other important articles in the urologic oncology literature, and reviews including an in-depth Seminar examining a specific clinical dilemma. The journal periodically publishes supplement issues devoted to areas of current interest to the urologic oncology community. Articles published are of interest to researchers and the clinicians involved in the practice of urologic oncology including urologists, oncologists, and radiologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信