An international and multidisciplinary EORTC survey on resectability of stage III non-small cell lung cancer.

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Ilias Houda, Idris Bahce, Chris Dickhoff, Tiuri E Kroese, Stephanie G C Kroeze, Alessio V Mariolo, Marco Tagliamento, Laura Moliner, Mariana Brandão, Yassin Pretzenbacher, John Edwards, Isabelle Opitz, Alessandro Brunelli, Matthias Guckenberger, Paul E van Schil, Sanjay Popat, Torsten Blum, Corinne Faivre-Finn, Dirk de Ruysscher, Jordi Remon, Thierry Berghmans, Anne-Marie C Dingemans, Benjamin Besse, Lizza E L Hendriks
{"title":"An international and multidisciplinary EORTC survey on resectability of stage III non-small cell lung cancer.","authors":"Ilias Houda, Idris Bahce, Chris Dickhoff, Tiuri E Kroese, Stephanie G C Kroeze, Alessio V Mariolo, Marco Tagliamento, Laura Moliner, Mariana Brandão, Yassin Pretzenbacher, John Edwards, Isabelle Opitz, Alessandro Brunelli, Matthias Guckenberger, Paul E van Schil, Sanjay Popat, Torsten Blum, Corinne Faivre-Finn, Dirk de Ruysscher, Jordi Remon, Thierry Berghmans, Anne-Marie C Dingemans, Benjamin Besse, Lizza E L Hendriks","doi":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.108061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The EORTC-Lung Cancer Group initiated a Delphi consensus process to establish a consensual definition of resectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) for the use in clinical trials, including a systematic review, survey, and review of clinical cases. Here, the survey results are presented, aimed to identify areas of controversy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey was distributed among the members of six international organizations related to lung cancer. Respondents were interrogated on the resectability (not limited to the technical resectability) of all stage III NSCLC TNM-subsets (8th edition). Additionally, four N2-subdivisions were used. The threshold for agreement was 75%. Answers with \"yes\" were considered upfront resectable. \"Yes\" and \"maybe\" were grouped together and considered potentially resectable. Answers with \"no\" were considered unresectable.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>558 responses were collected from thoracic surgeons (38%), radiation oncologists (27%), medical oncologists (17%), pulmonologists (14%), and others (4%). Most worked in a specialized center (80%), had >5 years of experience (80%), were European (76%), male (73%), and treated >20 patients with stage III NSCLC annually (77%). Agreement was found in 26 (70%) out of 37 TNM-subsets: 9 (24%) were considered (potentially) resectable, and 17 (46%) unresectable. There was no agreement for 11 (30%) TNM-subsets: smaller tumors with N2-multistation, larger tumors with N2-single station, and invasive T4-tumors with maximum N2-single station involvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This international and multidisciplinary survey showed agreement on the resectability for the majority of stage III NSCLC TNM-subsets, but also identified several TNM-subsets for which no agreement was found.</p>","PeriodicalId":18129,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer","volume":"199 ","pages":"108061"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lung Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.108061","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The EORTC-Lung Cancer Group initiated a Delphi consensus process to establish a consensual definition of resectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) for the use in clinical trials, including a systematic review, survey, and review of clinical cases. Here, the survey results are presented, aimed to identify areas of controversy.

Methods: A survey was distributed among the members of six international organizations related to lung cancer. Respondents were interrogated on the resectability (not limited to the technical resectability) of all stage III NSCLC TNM-subsets (8th edition). Additionally, four N2-subdivisions were used. The threshold for agreement was 75%. Answers with "yes" were considered upfront resectable. "Yes" and "maybe" were grouped together and considered potentially resectable. Answers with "no" were considered unresectable.

Results: 558 responses were collected from thoracic surgeons (38%), radiation oncologists (27%), medical oncologists (17%), pulmonologists (14%), and others (4%). Most worked in a specialized center (80%), had >5 years of experience (80%), were European (76%), male (73%), and treated >20 patients with stage III NSCLC annually (77%). Agreement was found in 26 (70%) out of 37 TNM-subsets: 9 (24%) were considered (potentially) resectable, and 17 (46%) unresectable. There was no agreement for 11 (30%) TNM-subsets: smaller tumors with N2-multistation, larger tumors with N2-single station, and invasive T4-tumors with maximum N2-single station involvement.

Conclusions: This international and multidisciplinary survey showed agreement on the resectability for the majority of stage III NSCLC TNM-subsets, but also identified several TNM-subsets for which no agreement was found.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Lung Cancer
Lung Cancer 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
407
审稿时长
25 days
期刊介绍: Lung Cancer is an international publication covering the clinical, translational and basic science of malignancies of the lung and chest region.Original research articles, early reports, review articles, editorials and correspondence covering the prevention, epidemiology and etiology, basic biology, pathology, clinical assessment, surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, combined treatment modalities, other treatment modalities and outcomes of lung cancer are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信