The Readability Study: A Randomised Trial of Health Information Written at Different Grade Reading Levels.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of General Internal Medicine Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-20 DOI:10.1007/s11606-024-09200-z
Olivia Mac, Julie Ayre, Kirsten McCaffery, Farzaneh Boroumand, Katy Bell, Danielle M Muscat
{"title":"The Readability Study: A Randomised Trial of Health Information Written at Different Grade Reading Levels.","authors":"Olivia Mac, Julie Ayre, Kirsten McCaffery, Farzaneh Boroumand, Katy Bell, Danielle M Muscat","doi":"10.1007/s11606-024-09200-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite increasing attention on health literacy and the inclusion of grade reading level recommendations in guidelines, it remains unclear if lowering the grade reading level of written health information to specific target grades improves patient-related outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess whether grade reading level of written information affects knowledge, perceived reading ease, acceptability and trustworthiness of information and, to explore whether information written at a lower grade reading level reduces disparities in outcomes across health literacy levels.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We conducted a 4-arm online randomized trial with a community sample of adults living in Australia from 31 July to 20 September 2023.</p><p><strong>Experimental arms: </strong>Participants were randomised to one of four arms: Information about sciatica and knee osteoarthritis written at a grade 8, 10, 12 or 14 reading level. Readability was assessed using the SMOG Index and iteratively revised to each lower grade.</p><p><strong>Measures: </strong>Primary outcome was knowledge of health conditions. Secondary outcomes were brief knowledge, perceived reading ease, acceptability (i.e., perceived usefulness and likelihood to recommend) and trustworthiness of information.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>2235 participants were randomised and included in the analysis. Mean age was 41 years and 54.5% identified as female. Low health literacy was identified in 28.2% of participants. We found no evidence of a main effect of grade reading level on knowledge (grade 8: 9.0 (SD = 2.7), grade 10: 9.1 (SD = 2.6), grade 12: 8.9, grade 14: 9.1 (SD = 2.7). Participants with high health literacy had higher knowledge scores overall, however, there was no evidence that health literacy modified the effect of grade reading level. There were no significant differences in any of the secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study showed no difference in knowledge when grade reading level was manipulated alone. Our findings indicate there is limited value in reducing grade reading level without attention to other health literacy principles.</p><p><strong>Anzctr trial registry number: </strong>ACTRN12623000224628p.</p>","PeriodicalId":15860,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1820-1828"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12119439/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-024-09200-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite increasing attention on health literacy and the inclusion of grade reading level recommendations in guidelines, it remains unclear if lowering the grade reading level of written health information to specific target grades improves patient-related outcomes.

Objective: To assess whether grade reading level of written information affects knowledge, perceived reading ease, acceptability and trustworthiness of information and, to explore whether information written at a lower grade reading level reduces disparities in outcomes across health literacy levels.

Design: We conducted a 4-arm online randomized trial with a community sample of adults living in Australia from 31 July to 20 September 2023.

Experimental arms: Participants were randomised to one of four arms: Information about sciatica and knee osteoarthritis written at a grade 8, 10, 12 or 14 reading level. Readability was assessed using the SMOG Index and iteratively revised to each lower grade.

Measures: Primary outcome was knowledge of health conditions. Secondary outcomes were brief knowledge, perceived reading ease, acceptability (i.e., perceived usefulness and likelihood to recommend) and trustworthiness of information.

Results: 2235 participants were randomised and included in the analysis. Mean age was 41 years and 54.5% identified as female. Low health literacy was identified in 28.2% of participants. We found no evidence of a main effect of grade reading level on knowledge (grade 8: 9.0 (SD = 2.7), grade 10: 9.1 (SD = 2.6), grade 12: 8.9, grade 14: 9.1 (SD = 2.7). Participants with high health literacy had higher knowledge scores overall, however, there was no evidence that health literacy modified the effect of grade reading level. There were no significant differences in any of the secondary outcomes.

Conclusions: Our study showed no difference in knowledge when grade reading level was manipulated alone. Our findings indicate there is limited value in reducing grade reading level without attention to other health literacy principles.

Anzctr trial registry number: ACTRN12623000224628p.

可读性研究:不同年级阅读水平的健康信息的随机试验。
背景:尽管人们越来越关注健康素养,并在指南中纳入了年级阅读水平建议,但将书面健康信息的年级阅读水平降低到特定目标年级是否能改善患者相关结果仍不清楚。目的:评估年级阅读水平的书面信息是否影响知识、感知阅读难易程度、信息的可接受性和可信度,并探讨较低年级阅读水平的书面信息是否会减少不同健康素养水平的结果差异。设计:我们在2023年7月31日至9月20日期间对居住在澳大利亚的成人社区样本进行了一项四组在线随机试验。实验组:参与者被随机分为四组:以8级、10级、12级或14级阅读水平书写有关坐骨神经痛和膝关节骨关节炎的信息。使用烟雾指数评估可读性,并迭代修订到每一个较低的等级。测量:主要结果是健康状况的知识。次要结果是简短的知识,感知阅读的容易程度,可接受性(即感知有用性和推荐的可能性)和信息的可信度。结果:2235名参与者被随机纳入分析。平均年龄41岁,54.5%为女性。28.2%的参与者健康素养较低。我们没有发现年级阅读水平对知识有主要影响的证据(8年级:9.0 (SD = 2.7), 10年级:9.1 (SD = 2.6), 12年级:8.9,14年级:9.1 (SD = 2.7))。健康素养高的被试总体上有较高的知识得分,但没有证据表明健康素养改变了年级阅读水平的影响。两组的次要结果均无显著差异。结论:我们的研究显示,当年级阅读水平被单独操纵时,知识没有差异。我们的研究结果表明,在不关注其他健康素养原则的情况下,降低年级阅读水平的价值有限。Anzctr试验注册号:ACTRN12623000224628p。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Journal of General Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
749
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of General Internal Medicine is the official journal of the Society of General Internal Medicine. It promotes improved patient care, research, and education in primary care, general internal medicine, and hospital medicine. Its articles focus on topics such as clinical medicine, epidemiology, prevention, health care delivery, curriculum development, and numerous other non-traditional themes, in addition to classic clinical research on problems in internal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信