Association of Social Vulnerability and Access to Higher Quality Medicare Advantage Plans.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of General Internal Medicine Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-20 DOI:10.1007/s11606-024-09252-1
Hansoo Ko, Ghaida Alsadah, Gilbert Gimm
{"title":"Association of Social Vulnerability and Access to Higher Quality Medicare Advantage Plans.","authors":"Hansoo Ko, Ghaida Alsadah, Gilbert Gimm","doi":"10.1007/s11606-024-09252-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With more than half of all beneficiaries enrolled in Medicare Advantage (MA) plans, ensuring access to high-quality MA plans is a key concern for policymakers. Access to high-quality MA plans may be limited in certain areas if private insurers are not willing to offer high-quality MA plans in local areas with greater unmet health-related social needs.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examined the association of a market-level social vulnerability index (SVI) score with the number of high-quality MA plans.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This study conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Our analysis included 3113 USA counties in 2020.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Our primary outcome measure, the availability of high-quality MA plans at the market level, was defined by counting the raw number of 5-star plans, plans with 4.5 or higher stars, and plans with 4 or higher stars. We also counted the number of all MA plans at the market level as an outcome measure to explore private insurers' market entry and participation decisions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found evidence that fewer high-quality MA plans are available in markets with greater unmet social needs (higher SVI scores). Compared to the least vulnerable markets, the most vulnerable markets had 1.5 fewer MA plans overall [95%CI -2.9, -0.1]. The most vulnerable markets also had 1.1 fewer 4 or higher star plans [95%CI -1.9, -0.3] than the least vulnerable markets. Furthermore, this negative association was concentrated in the southern region, which has a greater proportion of Black/African Americans in its market-level populations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>As historically marginalized groups are more likely to reside in markets with greater unmet social needs, disparities in access to high-quality MA plans may widen existing health disparities. Therefore, monitoring the availability of high-quality MA plans in areas with greater unmet social needs is needed to improve health equity for MA beneficiaries.</p>","PeriodicalId":15860,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1869-1876"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12119444/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-024-09252-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: With more than half of all beneficiaries enrolled in Medicare Advantage (MA) plans, ensuring access to high-quality MA plans is a key concern for policymakers. Access to high-quality MA plans may be limited in certain areas if private insurers are not willing to offer high-quality MA plans in local areas with greater unmet health-related social needs.

Objective: This study examined the association of a market-level social vulnerability index (SVI) score with the number of high-quality MA plans.

Design: This study conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study.

Participants: Our analysis included 3113 USA counties in 2020.

Main measures: Our primary outcome measure, the availability of high-quality MA plans at the market level, was defined by counting the raw number of 5-star plans, plans with 4.5 or higher stars, and plans with 4 or higher stars. We also counted the number of all MA plans at the market level as an outcome measure to explore private insurers' market entry and participation decisions.

Results: We found evidence that fewer high-quality MA plans are available in markets with greater unmet social needs (higher SVI scores). Compared to the least vulnerable markets, the most vulnerable markets had 1.5 fewer MA plans overall [95%CI -2.9, -0.1]. The most vulnerable markets also had 1.1 fewer 4 or higher star plans [95%CI -1.9, -0.3] than the least vulnerable markets. Furthermore, this negative association was concentrated in the southern region, which has a greater proportion of Black/African Americans in its market-level populations.

Conclusion: As historically marginalized groups are more likely to reside in markets with greater unmet social needs, disparities in access to high-quality MA plans may widen existing health disparities. Therefore, monitoring the availability of high-quality MA plans in areas with greater unmet social needs is needed to improve health equity for MA beneficiaries.

社会脆弱性和获得高质量医疗保险优势计划的协会。
背景:超过一半的受益人参加了医疗保险优势(MA)计划,确保获得高质量的MA计划是决策者关注的一个关键问题。如果私营保险公司不愿意在与健康有关的社会需求未得到更多满足的当地地区提供高质量的综合评估计划,那么在某些地区,获得高质量综合评估计划的机会可能会受到限制。目的:研究市场层面社会脆弱性指数(SVI)得分与优质MA计划数量的关系。设计:本研究采用回顾性横断面研究。参与者:我们的分析包括2020年美国3113个县。主要测量指标:我们的主要结果测量指标,即市场水平上高质量MA计划的可用性,通过计算5星计划、4.5星或更高星计划和4星或更高星计划的原始数量来定义。我们还统计了市场层面上所有MA计划的数量,作为研究私营保险公司市场进入和参与决策的结果指标。结果:我们发现证据表明,在未满足社会需求较大(SVI得分较高)的市场中,可获得的高质量MA计划较少。与最不脆弱的市场相比,最脆弱的市场的总体MA计划减少了1.5个[95%CI -2.9, -0.1]。最脆弱的市场也比最不脆弱的市场少1.1个4星或更高的计划[95%CI -1.9, -0.3]。此外,这种负面联系集中在南部地区,该地区市场人口中黑人/非裔美国人的比例较大。结论:由于历史上被边缘化的群体更有可能居住在社会需求未得到满足的市场,获得高质量MA计划的差距可能会扩大现有的健康差距。因此,需要在社会需求未得到满足较多的地区监测高质量综合医疗计划的可得性,以改善综合医疗受益人的保健公平性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Journal of General Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
749
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of General Internal Medicine is the official journal of the Society of General Internal Medicine. It promotes improved patient care, research, and education in primary care, general internal medicine, and hospital medicine. Its articles focus on topics such as clinical medicine, epidemiology, prevention, health care delivery, curriculum development, and numerous other non-traditional themes, in addition to classic clinical research on problems in internal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信