AAHPM Assessment Workgroup: Hospice and Palliative Medicine Fellowship Assessment Needs and Directions

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Briana Ketterer MD, MS, FACP , Laura Dingfield MD, MSEd, FAAHPM , Katie H. Stowers DO, FAAHPM , Katherine Morrison MD, FAAHPM , Amos Bailey MD, FACP, FAAHPM , Hilary Flint DO, MEd , Gary Buckholz MD, HMDC, FAAHPM , Laura J. Morrison MD, FAAHPM , Holly Yang MD, MSHPEd, HMDC, FAAHPM , Stephen Berns MD, FAAHPM
{"title":"AAHPM Assessment Workgroup: Hospice and Palliative Medicine Fellowship Assessment Needs and Directions","authors":"Briana Ketterer MD, MS, FACP ,&nbsp;Laura Dingfield MD, MSEd, FAAHPM ,&nbsp;Katie H. Stowers DO, FAAHPM ,&nbsp;Katherine Morrison MD, FAAHPM ,&nbsp;Amos Bailey MD, FACP, FAAHPM ,&nbsp;Hilary Flint DO, MEd ,&nbsp;Gary Buckholz MD, HMDC, FAAHPM ,&nbsp;Laura J. Morrison MD, FAAHPM ,&nbsp;Holly Yang MD, MSHPEd, HMDC, FAAHPM ,&nbsp;Stephen Berns MD, FAAHPM","doi":"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.12.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><div>Medical education is moving towards competency based medical education (CBME). This provides opportunities and challenges for the field of Hospice and Palliative Medicine (HPM). The American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine (AAHPM) created the Assessment Workgroup to spearhead a shared vision and process to implement high-quality assessment of fellow performance.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The workgroup solicited the assessment experiences of program directors (PD) and recently graduated fellows across HPM fellowship programs to understand the needs of the community and inform the group's next steps.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In 2022, a RedCap survey was emailed to HPM PDs asking about the methods of fellow assessment in their program and their confidence in those methods. Those PDs then sent a similar survey to their graduating fellows. Survey data was analyzed using SPSS. Qualitative analysis of narrative responses was conducted by the workgroup.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>56 PDs and 64 fellows responded. Nearly 50% use four or less assessment tools. Fellows reported greater confidence in assessment tools compared to PDs (83% vs. 68%). The most common assessors were physicians followed by interdisciplinary faculty. Many PDs (61%) reported no formal training in assessment and most reported dissatisfaction with faculty development in assessment (66%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>There is a lack of training and resources for HPM PDs in fellow assessment, and a need for faculty development. Fellows are engaged and should be invited as collaborators in this work. The AAHPM Assessment Workgroup is creating a nationally available resource of tools and accompanying faculty development materials.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16634,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pain and symptom management","volume":"69 3","pages":"Pages e220-e227"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pain and symptom management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885392424012107","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context

Medical education is moving towards competency based medical education (CBME). This provides opportunities and challenges for the field of Hospice and Palliative Medicine (HPM). The American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine (AAHPM) created the Assessment Workgroup to spearhead a shared vision and process to implement high-quality assessment of fellow performance.

Objectives

The workgroup solicited the assessment experiences of program directors (PD) and recently graduated fellows across HPM fellowship programs to understand the needs of the community and inform the group's next steps.

Methods

In 2022, a RedCap survey was emailed to HPM PDs asking about the methods of fellow assessment in their program and their confidence in those methods. Those PDs then sent a similar survey to their graduating fellows. Survey data was analyzed using SPSS. Qualitative analysis of narrative responses was conducted by the workgroup.

Results

56 PDs and 64 fellows responded. Nearly 50% use four or less assessment tools. Fellows reported greater confidence in assessment tools compared to PDs (83% vs. 68%). The most common assessors were physicians followed by interdisciplinary faculty. Many PDs (61%) reported no formal training in assessment and most reported dissatisfaction with faculty development in assessment (66%).

Conclusion

There is a lack of training and resources for HPM PDs in fellow assessment, and a need for faculty development. Fellows are engaged and should be invited as collaborators in this work. The AAHPM Assessment Workgroup is creating a nationally available resource of tools and accompanying faculty development materials.
AAHPM评估工作组:安宁疗护与缓和医学奖学金评估需求与方向。
背景:医学教育正朝着以能力为基础的医学教育(CBME)方向发展。这为临终关怀和姑息医学(HPM)领域提供了机遇和挑战。美国临终关怀与缓和医学学会(AAHPM)创建了评估工作组,以引领一个共同的愿景和过程,以实施对同事绩效的高质量评估。目标:工作组征求了项目主管(PD)和HPM奖学金项目中最近毕业的研究员的评估经验,以了解社区的需求并告知小组的下一步工作。方法:2022年,RedCap通过电子邮件向HPM pd发送了一份调查问卷,询问他们项目中同事评估的方法以及他们对这些方法的信心。然后,这些pd给他们的毕业生发了一份类似的调查。调查数据采用SPSS进行分析。工作组对叙述性反应进行了定性分析。结果:56名pd和64名研究员有反应。近50%的人使用四种或更少的评估工具。与pd相比,研究员对评估工具更有信心(83%对68%)。最常见的评估者是内科医生,其次是跨学科的教师。许多博士(61%)表示没有接受过正式的评估培训,大多数博士(66%)表示对教师在评估方面的发展不满意。结论:HPM pd在同伴评估中缺乏培训和资源,需要教师发展。研究员参与并应被邀请作为合作者参与这项工作。AAHPM评估工作组正在创建全国可用的工具资源和相应的教师发展材料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
6.40%
发文量
821
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pain and Symptom Management is an internationally respected, peer-reviewed journal and serves an interdisciplinary audience of professionals by providing a forum for the publication of the latest clinical research and best practices related to the relief of illness burden among patients afflicted with serious or life-threatening illness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信