Robotic dual-docking surgery for para-aortic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer: a prospective feasibility study.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Shintaro Yanazume, Hiroaki Kobayashi, Takashi Ushiwaka, Shinichi Togami, Masaki Kamio
{"title":"Robotic dual-docking surgery for para-aortic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer: a prospective feasibility study.","authors":"Shintaro Yanazume, Hiroaki Kobayashi, Takashi Ushiwaka, Shinichi Togami, Masaki Kamio","doi":"10.1007/s10147-024-02635-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The standard for robotic para-aortic lymphadenectomy has not been fully established. Para-aortic lymphadenectomy performed by sharing the same ports with pelvic procedures, a procedure known as dual-docking surgery, can be performed using the latest robotic system. We prospectively examined the ability of standardized dual-docking robotic surgery in endometrial cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study prospectively verified the feasibility and safety of dual-docking robotic surgeries performed between March 2017 and December 2021. The laterally placed ports were aligned with the umbilicus. Primary outcome was the surgical completion rate; secondary outcomes were blood loss, operative time, unexpected port placement, conversion, complications, length of hospital stay, and survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most patients (14/15, 93%) underwent surgery using our methods without additional port placements, and one patient was converted to laparotomy. Median blood loss was 162 mL (range: 20-685 mL). Median operative time was 183 and 206 min in the upper and lower abdomen. Median number of resected para-aortic lymph nodes was 19 (range: 6-29), and pelvic lymph nodes was 28 (range: 15-42). Although there was no difficulty in moving the forceps intraoperatively, major complications including vessel injury, and pelvic abscesses were observed. The lateral ports could be placed 6-10 cm apart in patients with any range of body type.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dual-docking surgery for endometrial cancer has the potential to be a standard procedure for robotic endometrial cancer surgery, although a greater number of cases are needed to acquire proficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"358-370"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11785595/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-024-02635-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The standard for robotic para-aortic lymphadenectomy has not been fully established. Para-aortic lymphadenectomy performed by sharing the same ports with pelvic procedures, a procedure known as dual-docking surgery, can be performed using the latest robotic system. We prospectively examined the ability of standardized dual-docking robotic surgery in endometrial cancer patients.

Methods: This study prospectively verified the feasibility and safety of dual-docking robotic surgeries performed between March 2017 and December 2021. The laterally placed ports were aligned with the umbilicus. Primary outcome was the surgical completion rate; secondary outcomes were blood loss, operative time, unexpected port placement, conversion, complications, length of hospital stay, and survival.

Results: Most patients (14/15, 93%) underwent surgery using our methods without additional port placements, and one patient was converted to laparotomy. Median blood loss was 162 mL (range: 20-685 mL). Median operative time was 183 and 206 min in the upper and lower abdomen. Median number of resected para-aortic lymph nodes was 19 (range: 6-29), and pelvic lymph nodes was 28 (range: 15-42). Although there was no difficulty in moving the forceps intraoperatively, major complications including vessel injury, and pelvic abscesses were observed. The lateral ports could be placed 6-10 cm apart in patients with any range of body type.

Conclusion: Dual-docking surgery for endometrial cancer has the potential to be a standard procedure for robotic endometrial cancer surgery, although a greater number of cases are needed to acquire proficiency.

机器人双对接手术用于子宫内膜癌腹主动脉旁淋巴结切除术:一项前瞻性可行性研究。
背景:机器人腹主动脉旁淋巴结切除术的标准尚未完全建立。通过与骨盆手术共用相同的端口进行的腹主动脉旁淋巴结切除术,即所谓的双对接手术,可以使用最新的机器人系统进行。我们前瞻性地研究了标准化双对接机器人手术在子宫内膜癌患者中的能力。方法:前瞻性验证2017年3月至2021年12月双对接机器人手术的可行性和安全性。侧边放置的端口与脐对齐。主要结局为手术完成率;次要结局是出血量、手术时间、意外移植位置、转换、并发症、住院时间和生存。结果:大多数患者(14/15,93%)采用我们的方法进行手术,没有额外的端口放置,1例患者转为剖腹手术。中位失血量162 mL(范围:20-685 mL)。上下腹手术时间中位数分别为183和206 min。切除的主动脉旁淋巴结中位数为19个(范围6-29),盆腔淋巴结中位数为28个(范围15-42)。虽然术中移动钳没有困难,但观察到血管损伤和盆腔脓肿等主要并发症。对于任何体型范围的患者,侧口可间隔6-10 cm。结论:子宫内膜癌的双对接手术有可能成为子宫内膜癌机器人手术的标准手术,尽管需要更多的病例来熟练掌握。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
3.00%
发文量
175
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Clinical Oncology (IJCO) welcomes original research papers on all aspects of clinical oncology that report the results of novel and timely investigations. Reports on clinical trials are encouraged. Experimental studies will also be accepted if they have obvious relevance to clinical oncology. Membership in the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology is not a prerequisite for submission to the journal. Papers are received on the understanding that: their contents have not been published in whole or in part elsewhere; that they are subject to peer review by at least two referees and the Editors, and to editorial revision of the language and contents; and that the Editors are responsible for their acceptance, rejection, and order of publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信