Perceptions, attitudes, and management of obesity in East Asians vs global: A pooled analysis of the ACTION IO survey.

IF 3.2 3区医学

Journal of Diabetes Investigation Pub Date : 2024-12-20 DOI:10.1111/jdi.14387

Jae-Heon Kang, Soo Lim, Jee-Hyun Kang, Yang-Hyun Kim, Hae-Jin Ko, Yoshihiro Ogawa, Iichiro Shimomura, YouSun Ha, Shogo Wada, Toshimasa Yamauchi, Masato Iwabu

{"title":"Perceptions, attitudes, and management of obesity in East Asians vs global: A pooled analysis of the ACTION IO survey.","authors":"Jae-Heon Kang, Soo Lim, Jee-Hyun Kang, Yang-Hyun Kim, Hae-Jin Ko, Yoshihiro Ogawa, Iichiro Shimomura, YouSun Ha, Shogo Wada, Toshimasa Yamauchi, Masato Iwabu","doi":"10.1111/jdi.14387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This ACTION-IO sub-analysis compared attitudes of people with obesity (PwO) and healthcare professionals (HCPs) between South Korea/Japan and global.Methods: Responses from overall (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 25 kg/m2) and higher BMI (30.0-34.9 kg/m2) groups were compared descriptively; t-and z-tests were used to test for statistical significant difference.Results: Total responses from South Korea/Japan vs global were as follows: overall (PwO: 3,501 vs 14,502; HCPs: 502 vs 2,785); higher BMI (PwO: 530 vs 7,460) groups. Compared to global, more South Korea/Japan-PwO considered improving existing health condition as top weight loss (WL) goal (overall: 37% vs 28%, higher BMI: 35% vs 26%; P < 0.05) and fear of weight regain as top WL barrier (overall: 52% vs 45%, higher BMI: 65% vs 42%; P < 0.05). Fewer South Korea/Japan-PwO reported discussing weight (overall: 25% vs 51%, higher BMI: 31% vs 54%; P < 0.05). More South Korea/Japan-HCPs felt PwO as themselves responsible for WL (74% vs 55%; P < 0.05). More than two-of-three South Korea/Japan-HCPs (vs four-of-five global) were motivated to help PwO in WL.Conclusions: South Korea/Japan PwO had differences in their attitudes and behaviors toward obesity care. These findings support the need for increased public awareness of obesity as a disease and for HCPs to play active role initiating weight management dialogue.","PeriodicalId":190,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Diabetes Investigation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Diabetes Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jdi.14387","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This ACTION-IO sub-analysis compared attitudes of people with obesity (PwO) and healthcare professionals (HCPs) between South Korea/Japan and global.

Methods: Responses from overall (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 25 kg/m²) and higher BMI (30.0-34.9 kg/m²) groups were compared descriptively; t-and z-tests were used to test for statistical significant difference.

Results: Total responses from South Korea/Japan vs global were as follows: overall (PwO: 3,501 vs 14,502; HCPs: 502 vs 2,785); higher BMI (PwO: 530 vs 7,460) groups. Compared to global, more South Korea/Japan-PwO considered improving existing health condition as top weight loss (WL) goal (overall: 37% vs 28%, higher BMI: 35% vs 26%; P < 0.05) and fear of weight regain as top WL barrier (overall: 52% vs 45%, higher BMI: 65% vs 42%; P < 0.05). Fewer South Korea/Japan-PwO reported discussing weight (overall: 25% vs 51%, higher BMI: 31% vs 54%; P < 0.05). More South Korea/Japan-HCPs felt PwO as themselves responsible for WL (74% vs 55%; P < 0.05). More than two-of-three South Korea/Japan-HCPs (vs four-of-five global) were motivated to help PwO in WL.

Conclusions: South Korea/Japan PwO had differences in their attitudes and behaviors toward obesity care. These findings support the need for increased public awareness of obesity as a disease and for HCPs to play active role initiating weight management dialogue.

查看原文本刊更多论文

东亚人与全球人对肥胖的认知、态度和管理：ACTION IO调查的汇总分析。

目的：本行动- io亚分析比较韩国/日本和全球肥胖人群（ppo）和医疗保健专业人员（HCPs）的态度。方法：描述性比较全组（体重指数[BMI]≥25 kg/m2）和高BMI组（30.0 ~ 34.9 kg/m2）的反应；采用t检验和z检验检验差异是否具有统计学意义。结果：韩国/日本与全球的总回应如下：总体(ppo: 3,501 vs 14,502；HCPs: 502 vs 2785)；高BMI组（ppo: 530 vs 7,460）。与全球相比，更多的韩国/日本受访者认为改善现有健康状况是减肥（WL）的最高目标(总体：37%对28%，较高BMI: 35%对26%；结论：韩国/日本女性对肥胖护理的态度和行为存在差异。这些发现支持需要提高公众对肥胖作为一种疾病的认识，并支持HCPs在发起体重管理对话中发挥积极作用。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Diabetes Investigation Medicine-Internal Medicine

自引率

9.40%

发文量

218

期刊介绍： Journal of Diabetes Investigation is your core diabetes journal from Asia; the official journal of the Asian Association for the Study of Diabetes (AASD). The journal publishes original research, country reports, commentaries, reviews, mini-reviews, case reports, letters, as well as editorials and news. Embracing clinical and experimental research in diabetes and related areas, the Journal of Diabetes Investigation includes aspects of prevention, treatment, as well as molecular aspects and pathophysiology. Translational research focused on the exchange of ideas between clinicians and researchers is also welcome. Journal of Diabetes Investigation is indexed by Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE).