Investigational Use of Real-World Data as a Hybrid Control in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma from the Randomized Phase Ib/II MORPHEUS Trial.

IF 6.3 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Andrew H Ko, Do-Youn Oh, Janet Lau, Shivani K Mhatre, Bo Ci, Robson Machado, Shi Li, Michael T Bretscher, Irmarie Reyes-Rivera, Jiawen Zhu, Xiaosong Zhang, Jilpa Patel, Matthew A Psioda, Mariano Ponz-Sarvise
{"title":"Investigational Use of Real-World Data as a Hybrid Control in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma from the Randomized Phase Ib/II MORPHEUS Trial.","authors":"Andrew H Ko, Do-Youn Oh, Janet Lau, Shivani K Mhatre, Bo Ci, Robson Machado, Shi Li, Michael T Bretscher, Irmarie Reyes-Rivera, Jiawen Zhu, Xiaosong Zhang, Jilpa Patel, Matthew A Psioda, Mariano Ponz-Sarvise","doi":"10.1002/cpt.3528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Enrolling adequate numbers of patients into the control arm of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) often presents barriers. There is interest in leveraging real-world data (RWD) from electronic health records (EHRs) to construct external control (EC) arms to supplement RCT control arms and form hybrid control (HC) arms. This investigation showed the use of an HC arm in second-line metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The RCT experimental arm (atezolizumab + PEGylated recombinant human hyaluronidase (Atezo + PEGPH20)) was compared with an HC arm consisting of patients treated with modified FOLFOX6 or gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel from the MORPHEUS PDAC internal control arm supplemented with data from a nationwide EHR-derived de-identified database as the EC arm. The EC arm was constructed by applying key inclusion/exclusion criteria from the MORPHEUS PDAC trial to patients from the real-world cohort. Baseline variables were balanced using propensity score matching and covariate adjustment. Three analysis approaches-Cox model with pooled-control data, Cox model with control arm-specific frailty, and Bayesian analysis using a commensurate prior-were assessed. Overall survival was similar between the treatment arms. The direction and magnitude of hazard ratios (HRs) from the multiple HC analyses (HRs ranged from 1.02 to 1.06) were comparable with the reported trial HR (HR 0.91; 95% CI: 0.56, 1.49). This analysis demonstrates the feasibility and applicability of leveraging RWD in clinical trial design to supplement clinical trial control arms.</p>","PeriodicalId":153,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.3528","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Enrolling adequate numbers of patients into the control arm of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) often presents barriers. There is interest in leveraging real-world data (RWD) from electronic health records (EHRs) to construct external control (EC) arms to supplement RCT control arms and form hybrid control (HC) arms. This investigation showed the use of an HC arm in second-line metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The RCT experimental arm (atezolizumab + PEGylated recombinant human hyaluronidase (Atezo + PEGPH20)) was compared with an HC arm consisting of patients treated with modified FOLFOX6 or gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel from the MORPHEUS PDAC internal control arm supplemented with data from a nationwide EHR-derived de-identified database as the EC arm. The EC arm was constructed by applying key inclusion/exclusion criteria from the MORPHEUS PDAC trial to patients from the real-world cohort. Baseline variables were balanced using propensity score matching and covariate adjustment. Three analysis approaches-Cox model with pooled-control data, Cox model with control arm-specific frailty, and Bayesian analysis using a commensurate prior-were assessed. Overall survival was similar between the treatment arms. The direction and magnitude of hazard ratios (HRs) from the multiple HC analyses (HRs ranged from 1.02 to 1.06) were comparable with the reported trial HR (HR 0.91; 95% CI: 0.56, 1.49). This analysis demonstrates the feasibility and applicability of leveraging RWD in clinical trial design to supplement clinical trial control arms.

随机Ib/II期MORPHEUS试验中使用真实世界数据作为胰腺导管腺癌混合对照的研究
将足够数量的患者纳入随机对照试验(RCTs)的对照组通常存在障碍。人们对利用来自电子健康记录(EHRs)的真实世界数据(RWD)来构建外部控制(EC)臂来补充RCT控制臂并形成混合控制(HC)臂很感兴趣。本研究显示HC臂在二线转移性胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)中的应用。RCT实验组(atezolizumab +聚乙二醇化重组人透明质酸酶(Atezo + PEGPH20))与HC组进行比较,HC组由来自MORPHEUS PDAC内部对照组的改良FOLFOX6或吉西他滨/nab-紫杉醇治疗的患者组成,并辅以来自全国ehr衍生的去识别数据库的数据作为EC组。EC组是通过将MORPHEUS PDAC试验的关键纳入/排除标准应用于来自现实世界队列的患者而构建的。使用倾向评分匹配和协变量调整平衡基线变量。评估了三种分析方法-合并对照数据的Cox模型,对照臂特异性脆弱性的Cox模型和使用相应先验的贝叶斯分析。治疗组之间的总生存率相似。多重HC分析得出的风险比(HR)的方向和大小(HR范围为1.02 ~ 1.06)与报道的试验HR (HR 0.91;95% ci: 0.56, 1.49)。这一分析证明了在临床试验设计中利用RWD补充临床试验对照组的可行性和适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
7.50%
发文量
290
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (CPT) is the authoritative cross-disciplinary journal in experimental and clinical medicine devoted to publishing advances in the nature, action, efficacy, and evaluation of therapeutics. CPT welcomes original Articles in the emerging areas of translational, predictive and personalized medicine; new therapeutic modalities including gene and cell therapies; pharmacogenomics, proteomics and metabolomics; bioinformation and applied systems biology complementing areas of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, human investigation and clinical trials, pharmacovigilence, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacometrics, and population pharmacology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信