Implementation Strategy for Artificial Intelligence in Radiotherapy: Can Implementation Science Help?

IF 3.3 Q2 ONCOLOGY
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-20 DOI:10.1200/CCI.24.00101
Rachelle Swart, Liesbeth Boersma, Rianne Fijten, Wouter van Elmpt, Paul Cremers, Maria J G Jacobs
{"title":"Implementation Strategy for Artificial Intelligence in Radiotherapy: Can Implementation Science Help?","authors":"Rachelle Swart, Liesbeth Boersma, Rianne Fijten, Wouter van Elmpt, Paul Cremers, Maria J G Jacobs","doi":"10.1200/CCI.24.00101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Artificial intelligence (AI) applications in radiotherapy (RT) are expected to save time and improve quality, but implementation remains limited. Therefore, we used implementation science to develop a format for designing an implementation strategy for AI. This study aimed to (1) apply this format to develop an AI implementation strategy for our center; (2) identify insights gained to enhance AI implementation using this format; and (3) assess the feasibility and acceptability of this format to design a center-specific implementation strategy for departments aiming to implement AI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We created an AI-implementation strategy for our own center using implementation science methods. This included a stakeholder analysis, literature review, and interviews to identify facilitators and barriers, and designed strategies to overcome the barriers. These methods were subsequently used in a workshop with teams from seven Dutch RT centers to develop their own AI-implementation plans. The applicability, appropriateness, and feasibility were evaluated by the workshop participants, and relevant insights for AI implementation were summarized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The stakeholder analysis identified internal (physicians, physicists, RT technicians, information technology, and education) and external (patients and representatives) stakeholders. Barriers and facilitators included concerns about opacity, privacy, data quality, legal aspects, knowledge, trust, stakeholder involvement, ethics, and multidisciplinary collaboration, all integrated into our implementation strategy. The workshop evaluation showed high acceptability (18 participants [90%]), appropriateness (17 participants [85%]), and feasibility (15 participants [75%]) of the implementation strategy. Sixteen participants fully agreed with the format.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study highlights the need for a collaborative approach to implement AI in RT. We designed a strategy to overcome organizational challenges, improve AI integration, and enhance patient care. Workshop feedback indicates the proposed methods are useful for multiple RT centers. Insights gained by applying the methods highlight the importance of multidisciplinary collaboration in the development and implementation of AI.</p>","PeriodicalId":51626,"journal":{"name":"JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics","volume":"8 ","pages":"e2400101"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11670909/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/CCI.24.00101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Artificial intelligence (AI) applications in radiotherapy (RT) are expected to save time and improve quality, but implementation remains limited. Therefore, we used implementation science to develop a format for designing an implementation strategy for AI. This study aimed to (1) apply this format to develop an AI implementation strategy for our center; (2) identify insights gained to enhance AI implementation using this format; and (3) assess the feasibility and acceptability of this format to design a center-specific implementation strategy for departments aiming to implement AI.

Methods: We created an AI-implementation strategy for our own center using implementation science methods. This included a stakeholder analysis, literature review, and interviews to identify facilitators and barriers, and designed strategies to overcome the barriers. These methods were subsequently used in a workshop with teams from seven Dutch RT centers to develop their own AI-implementation plans. The applicability, appropriateness, and feasibility were evaluated by the workshop participants, and relevant insights for AI implementation were summarized.

Results: The stakeholder analysis identified internal (physicians, physicists, RT technicians, information technology, and education) and external (patients and representatives) stakeholders. Barriers and facilitators included concerns about opacity, privacy, data quality, legal aspects, knowledge, trust, stakeholder involvement, ethics, and multidisciplinary collaboration, all integrated into our implementation strategy. The workshop evaluation showed high acceptability (18 participants [90%]), appropriateness (17 participants [85%]), and feasibility (15 participants [75%]) of the implementation strategy. Sixteen participants fully agreed with the format.

Conclusion: Our study highlights the need for a collaborative approach to implement AI in RT. We designed a strategy to overcome organizational challenges, improve AI integration, and enhance patient care. Workshop feedback indicates the proposed methods are useful for multiple RT centers. Insights gained by applying the methods highlight the importance of multidisciplinary collaboration in the development and implementation of AI.

人工智能在放射治疗中的实施策略:实施科学有帮助吗?
目的:人工智能(AI)在放射治疗(RT)中的应用有望节省时间和提高质量,但实施仍然有限。因此,我们使用实现科学来开发设计人工智能实现策略的格式。本研究旨在(1)应用此格式为我们的中心制定人工智能实施策略;(2)识别使用此格式增强人工智能实施所获得的见解;(3)评估该格式的可行性和可接受性,为旨在实施人工智能的部门设计特定于中心的实施策略。方法:运用实施科学的方法为我们自己的中心制定了人工智能实施策略。这包括利益相关者分析、文献回顾和访谈,以确定促进因素和障碍,并设计策略来克服障碍。这些方法随后在荷兰七个RT中心的团队的研讨会上使用,以制定他们自己的人工智能实施计划。研讨会参与者评估了适用性、适当性和可行性,并总结了人工智能实施的相关见解。结果:利益相关者分析确定了内部利益相关者(医生、物理学家、RT技术人员、信息技术和教育)和外部利益相关者(患者和代表)。障碍和促进因素包括对不透明、隐私、数据质量、法律方面、知识、信任、利益相关者参与、道德和多学科合作的担忧,这些都纳入了我们的实施战略。工作坊评估显示实施策略的可接受性(18人[90%])、适宜性(17人[85%])和可行性(15人[75%])较高。16位与会者完全同意会议形式。结论:我们的研究强调了在rt中实施人工智能的协作方法的必要性。我们设计了一种策略来克服组织挑战,改善人工智能集成,并加强患者护理。研讨会反馈表明,所提出的方法适用于多个RT中心。通过应用这些方法获得的见解强调了在人工智能的开发和实施中多学科合作的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
190
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信