Parental Perspectives on Pediatric Surgical Recovery: Narrative Analysis of Free-Text Comments From a Postoperative Survey.

Jessica Luo, Nicholas C West, Samantha Pang, Julie M Robillard, Patricia Page, Neil K Chadha, Heng Gan, Lynnie R Correll, Randa Ridgway, Natasha Broemling, Matthias Görges
{"title":"Parental Perspectives on Pediatric Surgical Recovery: Narrative Analysis of Free-Text Comments From a Postoperative Survey.","authors":"Jessica Luo, Nicholas C West, Samantha Pang, Julie M Robillard, Patricia Page, Neil K Chadha, Heng Gan, Lynnie R Correll, Randa Ridgway, Natasha Broemling, Matthias Görges","doi":"10.2196/65198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Qualitative experience data can inform health care providers how to best support families during pediatric postoperative recovery. Patient experience data can also provide actionable information to guide health care quality improvement; positive feedback can confirm the efficacy of current practices and systems, while negative comments can identify areas for improvement.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to understand families' perspectives regarding their children's surgical recovery using qualitative patient experience data (free-text comments) from a prospective cohort study conducted within a larger study developing a postoperative-outcome risk stratification model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were parents or guardians of children aged 0-18 years who underwent surgery at a pediatric tertiary care facility; children undergoing either outpatient or inpatient procedures were eligible to be enrolled. Participants with English as a second language were offered translational services during the consent process and were included if any family member could translate the surveys into their preferred language. Participants were ineligible if they and their families could not understand English or the child had a neurodevelopmental disability. Perioperative data were collected from families using web-based surveys, including 1 preoperative survey and follow-up surveys sent on postoperative days 1, 2, 3, 7, 15, 30, and 90. Surveys were completed until the family indicated the child was fully recovered or until postoperative day 90 was reached. Follow-up surveys included opportunities to leave free-text comments on the child's surgical experience.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 91% (453/500) of enrolled families completed at least 1 postoperative survey; 53% (242/453) provided at least 1 free-text comment and were included in the presented analysis, based on a total of 485 comments. The patient's age distribution was bimodal (modes at 2-3 and 14-15 years), with 66% (160/242) being male. Patients underwent orthopedic (60/242, 25%), urological (39/242, 16%), general (36/242,15%), otolaryngological (31/242, 13%), ophthalmological (32/242, 13%), dental (27/242, 11%), and plastic (17/242, 7%) surgeries. Largely positive comments (398/485, 82%) were made on the recovery and clinical care experience. A key theme for improvement included \"communication,\" with subthemes highlighting parental concerns regarding the \"preoperative discussions,\" \"clarity of discharge instructions,\" and \"continuity of care.\" Other themes included \"length of stay\" and \"recovery experience.\" Feedback also suggested survey design amendments for future iterations of this instrument.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Collecting parental recovery feedback is feasible and valued by families. Findings underscored the significance of enhancing communication strategies between health care providers and parents to align expectations and support proactive family-centered care. Our postoperative surveys allowed families to provide actionable suggestions for improving their experience, which may not have been considered during their hospital encounter. Our longitudinal survey protocol may be expanded to support continuous quality improvement initiatives involving near-real-time patient feedback to improve the health care experience of patients and families.</p>","PeriodicalId":73557,"journal":{"name":"JMIR perioperative medicine","volume":"7 ","pages":"e65198"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11699487/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR perioperative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/65198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Qualitative experience data can inform health care providers how to best support families during pediatric postoperative recovery. Patient experience data can also provide actionable information to guide health care quality improvement; positive feedback can confirm the efficacy of current practices and systems, while negative comments can identify areas for improvement.

Objective: This study aimed to understand families' perspectives regarding their children's surgical recovery using qualitative patient experience data (free-text comments) from a prospective cohort study conducted within a larger study developing a postoperative-outcome risk stratification model.

Methods: Participants were parents or guardians of children aged 0-18 years who underwent surgery at a pediatric tertiary care facility; children undergoing either outpatient or inpatient procedures were eligible to be enrolled. Participants with English as a second language were offered translational services during the consent process and were included if any family member could translate the surveys into their preferred language. Participants were ineligible if they and their families could not understand English or the child had a neurodevelopmental disability. Perioperative data were collected from families using web-based surveys, including 1 preoperative survey and follow-up surveys sent on postoperative days 1, 2, 3, 7, 15, 30, and 90. Surveys were completed until the family indicated the child was fully recovered or until postoperative day 90 was reached. Follow-up surveys included opportunities to leave free-text comments on the child's surgical experience.

Results: In total, 91% (453/500) of enrolled families completed at least 1 postoperative survey; 53% (242/453) provided at least 1 free-text comment and were included in the presented analysis, based on a total of 485 comments. The patient's age distribution was bimodal (modes at 2-3 and 14-15 years), with 66% (160/242) being male. Patients underwent orthopedic (60/242, 25%), urological (39/242, 16%), general (36/242,15%), otolaryngological (31/242, 13%), ophthalmological (32/242, 13%), dental (27/242, 11%), and plastic (17/242, 7%) surgeries. Largely positive comments (398/485, 82%) were made on the recovery and clinical care experience. A key theme for improvement included "communication," with subthemes highlighting parental concerns regarding the "preoperative discussions," "clarity of discharge instructions," and "continuity of care." Other themes included "length of stay" and "recovery experience." Feedback also suggested survey design amendments for future iterations of this instrument.

Conclusions: Collecting parental recovery feedback is feasible and valued by families. Findings underscored the significance of enhancing communication strategies between health care providers and parents to align expectations and support proactive family-centered care. Our postoperative surveys allowed families to provide actionable suggestions for improving their experience, which may not have been considered during their hospital encounter. Our longitudinal survey protocol may be expanded to support continuous quality improvement initiatives involving near-real-time patient feedback to improve the health care experience of patients and families.

父母对儿童手术恢复的看法:术后调查中自由文本评论的叙事分析。
背景:定性经验数据可以告知卫生保健提供者如何在儿科术后恢复期间最好地支持家庭。患者体验数据还可以提供可操作的信息,以指导卫生保健质量的提高;积极的反馈可以确认当前实践和系统的有效性,而消极的评论可以确定需要改进的地方。目的:本研究旨在通过一项前瞻性队列研究中的定性患者体验数据(自由文本评论)来了解家庭对其儿童手术恢复的看法,该研究是在一项大型研究中进行的,该研究开发了一种术后结局风险分层模型。方法:参与者是在儿科三级医疗机构接受手术的0-18岁儿童的父母或监护人;接受门诊或住院治疗的儿童均符合入选条件。在同意过程中为英语为第二语言的参与者提供翻译服务,如果任何家庭成员可以将调查翻译成他们喜欢的语言,则包括在内。如果参与者和他们的家人不懂英语,或者孩子有神经发育障碍,那么他们就没有资格。围手术期数据通过基于网络的调查从家庭中收集,包括1次术前调查和术后1、2、3、7、15、30和90天的随访调查。直到家庭表明患儿完全康复或术后第90天完成调查。后续调查包括留下孩子手术经验的自由文本评论的机会。结果:91%(453/500)的入选家庭完成了至少1次术后调查;53%(242/453)提供了至少1条自由文本评论,并纳入了基于485条评论的分析。患者的年龄分布呈双峰分布(2-3岁和14-15岁),其中66%(160/242)为男性。患者接受骨科(60/242,25%)、泌尿外科(39/242,16%)、普通外科(36/242,15%)、耳鼻喉科(31/242,13%)、眼科(32/242,13%)、牙科(27/242,11%)和整形外科(17/242,7%)手术。大部分正面评价(398/485,82%)是关于康复和临床护理经验。改进的一个关键主题包括“沟通”,其子主题突出了家长对“术前讨论”、“出院指示的清晰度”和“护理的连续性”的关注。其他主题包括“住院时间”和“康复经验”。反馈还建议对该仪器的未来迭代进行调查设计修改。结论:收集父母康复反馈信息是可行的,受到家庭的重视。研究结果强调了加强卫生保健提供者和家长之间沟通策略的重要性,以协调期望并支持积极的以家庭为中心的护理。我们的术后调查允许家属提供可操作的建议,以改善他们的体验,这可能是他们在医院遇到时没有考虑到的。我们的纵向调查方案可以扩展,以支持持续的质量改进计划,包括近实时的患者反馈,以改善患者和家属的医疗保健体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信