Comparative Effectiveness of Analgesia for Early Pain Management After Pediatric Tonsillectomy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Anesthesia and analgesia Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-20 DOI:10.1213/ANE.0000000000007352
Xialin Deng, Shishun Zhao, Wenlai Guo, Xiao Wan, Di You
{"title":"Comparative Effectiveness of Analgesia for Early Pain Management After Pediatric Tonsillectomy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Xialin Deng, Shishun Zhao, Wenlai Guo, Xiao Wan, Di You","doi":"10.1213/ANE.0000000000007352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Timely and effective analgesia after tonsillectomy in children is crucial, but there is currently no consensus on the optimal analgesics. This analysis aimed to identify the most effective for this surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis (random-effects model) of randomized controlled trials comparing analgesics for pediatric tonsillectomy. We searched relevant studies in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases from database inception until June 30, 2023. Children (≤18 years old) who underwent tonsillectomy with or without adenoidectomy were eligible for inclusion. Primary outcomes encompassed pain score and postoperative complications; secondary outcomes included postoperative supplementary analgesia, functional evaluation, and sedation score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total 82 randomized controlled trials involving 6110 patients were included, forming the primary network that comprised comparative data for 16 different interventions (including placebo) across 6 types of analgesics. The integrated analysis revealed that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs except ketoprofen had no significant effects in relieving postoperative pain (mean difference [MD], -2.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], -5.59 to -0.32; P = .10). Local anesthetic infiltration (bupivacaine: MD, -2.76; 95% CI, -3.88 to -1.64, P = .01; ropivacaine: MD, -2.49; 95% CI, -4.25 to -0.73, P = .02; lidocaine: MD, -1.86; 95% CI,-3.52 to -0.2, P = .02; levobupivacaine: MD, -1.06; 95% CI, -2.00 to -0.12, P = .01), analgesics (morphine: MD, -2.07; 95% CI, -3.14 to -1.00; P = .02), and glucocorticoids (dexamethasone: MD, -0.45; 95% CI, -0.73 to -0.16; P = .01) were effective in relieving pain after pediatric tonsillectomy. In reducing incidence of postoperative complications, dexamethasone was superior to bupivacaine (relative risk [RR], 0.60; 95% CI, 0.43-0.83; P = .02). Regarding the number of patients needing rescue analgesic, levobupivacaine was superior to lidocaine (RR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.32-0.81; P = .01). In rescue analgesia requirement, morphine outperformed lidocaine (RR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.25-0.75; P = .01) and ropivacaine (RR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.32-0.91; P = .01) in efficacy but not different from bupivacaine ( P = .10) and levobupivacaine ( P = .12).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on these results, we would recommend local bupivacaine infiltration or local levobupivacaine infiltration for older children and dexamethasone injection for younger children for early analgesia after tonsillectomy. However, clinicians should choose the optimal analgesic based on the individual child's condition and clinical situation.</p>","PeriodicalId":7784,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia and analgesia","volume":" ","pages":"1037-1051"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia and analgesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000007352","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Timely and effective analgesia after tonsillectomy in children is crucial, but there is currently no consensus on the optimal analgesics. This analysis aimed to identify the most effective for this surgery.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis (random-effects model) of randomized controlled trials comparing analgesics for pediatric tonsillectomy. We searched relevant studies in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases from database inception until June 30, 2023. Children (≤18 years old) who underwent tonsillectomy with or without adenoidectomy were eligible for inclusion. Primary outcomes encompassed pain score and postoperative complications; secondary outcomes included postoperative supplementary analgesia, functional evaluation, and sedation score.

Results: In total 82 randomized controlled trials involving 6110 patients were included, forming the primary network that comprised comparative data for 16 different interventions (including placebo) across 6 types of analgesics. The integrated analysis revealed that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs except ketoprofen had no significant effects in relieving postoperative pain (mean difference [MD], -2.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], -5.59 to -0.32; P = .10). Local anesthetic infiltration (bupivacaine: MD, -2.76; 95% CI, -3.88 to -1.64, P = .01; ropivacaine: MD, -2.49; 95% CI, -4.25 to -0.73, P = .02; lidocaine: MD, -1.86; 95% CI,-3.52 to -0.2, P = .02; levobupivacaine: MD, -1.06; 95% CI, -2.00 to -0.12, P = .01), analgesics (morphine: MD, -2.07; 95% CI, -3.14 to -1.00; P = .02), and glucocorticoids (dexamethasone: MD, -0.45; 95% CI, -0.73 to -0.16; P = .01) were effective in relieving pain after pediatric tonsillectomy. In reducing incidence of postoperative complications, dexamethasone was superior to bupivacaine (relative risk [RR], 0.60; 95% CI, 0.43-0.83; P = .02). Regarding the number of patients needing rescue analgesic, levobupivacaine was superior to lidocaine (RR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.32-0.81; P = .01). In rescue analgesia requirement, morphine outperformed lidocaine (RR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.25-0.75; P = .01) and ropivacaine (RR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.32-0.91; P = .01) in efficacy but not different from bupivacaine ( P = .10) and levobupivacaine ( P = .12).

Conclusions: Based on these results, we would recommend local bupivacaine infiltration or local levobupivacaine infiltration for older children and dexamethasone injection for younger children for early analgesia after tonsillectomy. However, clinicians should choose the optimal analgesic based on the individual child's condition and clinical situation.

儿童扁桃体切除术后镇痛治疗早期疼痛的比较效果:系统综述和网络荟萃分析。
背景:儿童扁桃体切除术后及时有效的镇痛至关重要,但目前尚未就最佳镇痛药物达成共识。本分析旨在确定对该手术最有效的镇痛药:我们对比较小儿扁桃体切除术镇痛剂的随机对照试验进行了系统回顾和网络荟萃分析(随机效应模型)。我们在 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library 和 Web of Science 数据库中检索了从数据库建立到 2023 年 6 月 30 日的相关研究。接受扁桃体切除术或未接受腺样体切除术的儿童(18 岁以下)均符合纳入条件。主要结果包括疼痛评分和术后并发症;次要结果包括术后辅助镇痛、功能评估和镇静评分:结果:共纳入了82项随机对照试验,涉及6110名患者,形成了由6种镇痛药的16种不同干预措施(包括安慰剂)的比较数据组成的主要网络。综合分析表明,除酮洛芬外,非甾体抗炎药对缓解术后疼痛无明显效果(平均差 [MD],-2.96;95% 置信区间 [CI],-5.59 至 -0.32;P = .10)。局部麻醉浸润(布比卡因:MD, -2.76; 95% CI, -3.88 to -1.64, P = .01;罗哌卡因:MD, -2.49; 95% CI, -4.25 to -0.73, P = .02; lidocaine:MD,-1.86;95% CI,-3.52 至 -0.2,P = .02;左布比卡因:MD, -1.06; 95% CI, -2.00 to -0.12, P = .01)、镇痛剂(吗啡:MD, -2.07; 95% CI, -3.14 to -1.00; P = .02)和糖皮质激素(地塞米松:MD, -0.45; 95% CI, -0.73 to -0.16; P = .01)都能有效缓解小儿扁桃体切除术后的疼痛。在降低术后并发症发生率方面,地塞米松优于布比卡因(相对风险 [RR],0.60;95% CI,0.43-0.83;P = .02)。在需要使用镇痛药的患者人数方面,左布比卡因优于利多卡因(RR,0.51;95% CI,0.32-0.81;P = .01)。在抢救镇痛需求方面,吗啡的疗效优于利多卡因(RR,0.44;95% CI,0.25-0.75;P = .01)和罗哌卡因(RR,0.54;95% CI,0.32-0.91;P = .01),但与布比卡因(P = .10)和左布比卡因(P = .12)相比没有差异:根据上述结果,我们建议在扁桃体切除术后早期镇痛时,年龄较大的患儿采用局部布比卡因浸润或局部左布比卡因浸润,年龄较小的患儿采用地塞米松注射。不过,临床医生应根据每个儿童的病情和临床情况选择最佳镇痛药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anesthesia and analgesia
Anesthesia and analgesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
7.00%
发文量
817
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Anesthesia & Analgesia exists for the benefit of patients under the care of health care professionals engaged in the disciplines broadly related to anesthesiology, perioperative medicine, critical care medicine, and pain medicine. The Journal furthers the care of these patients by reporting the fundamental advances in the science of these clinical disciplines and by documenting the clinical, laboratory, and administrative advances that guide therapy. Anesthesia & Analgesia seeks a balance between definitive clinical and management investigations and outstanding basic scientific reports. The Journal welcomes original manuscripts containing rigorous design and analysis, even if unusual in their approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信