Revisiting penetrometer models for estimating root elongation

Renato Paiva de Lima, Cássio Antonio Tormena, Moacir Tuzzin de Moraes, Zigomar Menezes de Souzar, Mário Monteiro Rolim, Maurício Roberto Cherubin
{"title":"Revisiting penetrometer models for estimating root elongation","authors":"Renato Paiva de Lima, Cássio Antonio Tormena, Moacir Tuzzin de Moraes, Zigomar Menezes de Souzar, Mário Monteiro Rolim, Maurício Roberto Cherubin","doi":"10.1016/j.still.2024.106400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mechanical impedance has been reported as a major factor reducing root elongation. Penetrometer is the main tool for diagnosing mechanical soil conditions regarding root growth; however, soil mechanics processes influence root cavity expansion, friction and adhesion at the soil-metal interface which can induce root-related measurement overestimations. Models based on penetrometers have been used to estimate root elongation and assign penetration resistance thresholds, which have been used to determine soil physical limitation for plant development. In this paper, we revisited soil mechanical aspects modeling considering root-soil and penetrometer-soil interfaces, including calculation examples. Moreover, we revisited the application of penetration resistance threshold in soil integrated physical indices for root and plant growth. Our calculations showed that friction is a major factor inducing overestimates at penetrometer-soil interfaces. However, current mathematical models enable estimating normal stress for cavity expansion by removing the effect of soil adhesion and friction, and reducing the impact of penetrometer cone tip angle on soil-metal friction. Additionally, we estimated root elongation rate for a series of plant species as a function of penetrometer resistance which could be applied to soil physical indices for estimating limit plant growth threshold.","PeriodicalId":501007,"journal":{"name":"Soil and Tillage Research","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil and Tillage Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2024.106400","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mechanical impedance has been reported as a major factor reducing root elongation. Penetrometer is the main tool for diagnosing mechanical soil conditions regarding root growth; however, soil mechanics processes influence root cavity expansion, friction and adhesion at the soil-metal interface which can induce root-related measurement overestimations. Models based on penetrometers have been used to estimate root elongation and assign penetration resistance thresholds, which have been used to determine soil physical limitation for plant development. In this paper, we revisited soil mechanical aspects modeling considering root-soil and penetrometer-soil interfaces, including calculation examples. Moreover, we revisited the application of penetration resistance threshold in soil integrated physical indices for root and plant growth. Our calculations showed that friction is a major factor inducing overestimates at penetrometer-soil interfaces. However, current mathematical models enable estimating normal stress for cavity expansion by removing the effect of soil adhesion and friction, and reducing the impact of penetrometer cone tip angle on soil-metal friction. Additionally, we estimated root elongation rate for a series of plant species as a function of penetrometer resistance which could be applied to soil physical indices for estimating limit plant growth threshold.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信