Supporting patients with advanced cancer and their spouses in parenting minor children: results of a randomized controlled trial.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Oncologist Pub Date : 2024-12-19 DOI:10.1093/oncolo/oyae351
Kathrin Milbury, Sujin Ann-Yi, Meagan S Whisenant, Morgan Jones, Yisheng Li, Victoria Necroto, Sania D Yousuf, Mariana Chavez-MacGregor, Larrisa Meyers, Eduardo Bruera
{"title":"Supporting patients with advanced cancer and their spouses in parenting minor children: results of a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Kathrin Milbury, Sujin Ann-Yi, Meagan S Whisenant, Morgan Jones, Yisheng Li, Victoria Necroto, Sania D Yousuf, Mariana Chavez-MacGregor, Larrisa Meyers, Eduardo Bruera","doi":"10.1093/oncolo/oyae351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patients with advanced cancer and their spousal caregivers who parent minor children report unmet parenting concerns and increased psychological distress. Seeking to address these important supportive care needs, this RCT examined the feasibility, acceptability, and initial evidence for the efficacy of a novel psychosocial intervention.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Patients with a metastatic solid malignancy and their spouses completed self-reported validated assessments of psychological symptoms and cancer-related parenting outcomes and were then randomized to the parent support intervention or a usual care (UC) group. Both groups were reassessed 6 and 12 weeks later. Dyads randomized to the counselor-led intervention attended the first 2 sessions jointly addressing illness communication and family routines. Spouses individually attended the last 2 sessions focusing on caregiver support and family death preparedness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty patients and their spouses were randomized. All a priori feasibility benchmarks were met. Attendance in the intervention arm was high with 84% of caregivers attending all 4 sessions (mean = 3.48). The program was evaluated favorably by all patients and spouses deeming the intervention as beneficial. Caregivers rated the individual-level sessions as particularly helpful. Multilevel analyses revealed a significant reduction in anxiety symptoms (P = .05) and improvement in parenting efficacy (P = .03) at 6-week follow-up in the intervention group compared with UC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The initial testing of our parent support intervention yielded promising results regarding feasibility and preliminary evidence for efficacy for reduced anxiety symptoms and improved parenting efficacy. This program may meet a frequent and distressing psychosocial need that is typically unaddressed by multidisciplinary oncology teams.</p>","PeriodicalId":54686,"journal":{"name":"Oncologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyae351","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Patients with advanced cancer and their spousal caregivers who parent minor children report unmet parenting concerns and increased psychological distress. Seeking to address these important supportive care needs, this RCT examined the feasibility, acceptability, and initial evidence for the efficacy of a novel psychosocial intervention.

Patients and methods: Patients with a metastatic solid malignancy and their spouses completed self-reported validated assessments of psychological symptoms and cancer-related parenting outcomes and were then randomized to the parent support intervention or a usual care (UC) group. Both groups were reassessed 6 and 12 weeks later. Dyads randomized to the counselor-led intervention attended the first 2 sessions jointly addressing illness communication and family routines. Spouses individually attended the last 2 sessions focusing on caregiver support and family death preparedness.

Results: Fifty patients and their spouses were randomized. All a priori feasibility benchmarks were met. Attendance in the intervention arm was high with 84% of caregivers attending all 4 sessions (mean = 3.48). The program was evaluated favorably by all patients and spouses deeming the intervention as beneficial. Caregivers rated the individual-level sessions as particularly helpful. Multilevel analyses revealed a significant reduction in anxiety symptoms (P = .05) and improvement in parenting efficacy (P = .03) at 6-week follow-up in the intervention group compared with UC.

Conclusions: The initial testing of our parent support intervention yielded promising results regarding feasibility and preliminary evidence for efficacy for reduced anxiety symptoms and improved parenting efficacy. This program may meet a frequent and distressing psychosocial need that is typically unaddressed by multidisciplinary oncology teams.

支持晚期癌症患者及其配偶抚养未成年子女:一项随机对照试验的结果。
导读:晚期癌症患者和他们的配偶照顾者谁的未成年子女报告未满足的养育问题和增加的心理困扰。为了解决这些重要的支持性护理需求,本随机对照试验检查了一种新型心理社会干预的可行性、可接受性和有效性的初步证据。患者和方法:转移性实体恶性肿瘤患者及其配偶完成自我报告的心理症状和与癌症相关的育儿结果评估,然后随机分为父母支持干预组或常规护理组(UC)。6周和12周后再对两组进行评估。被随机分配到咨询师主导的干预组的两组儿童参加了前两次会议,共同讨论疾病沟通和家庭日常事务。配偶单独参加了最后两次会议,重点是照顾者支持和家庭死亡准备。结果:随机选取50例患者及其配偶。所有先验的可行性基准均已达到。干预组的出勤率很高,84%的护理人员参加了所有4次会议(平均= 3.48)。所有患者及其配偶都认为干预是有益的,对该计划进行了积极评价。护理人员认为个人层面的课程特别有帮助。多水平分析显示,与UC相比,干预组在6周的随访中焦虑症状显著减少(P = 0.05),育儿效果显著改善(P = 0.03)。结论:我们的父母支持干预的初步测试在减少焦虑症状和提高育儿效果方面的可行性和初步证据方面取得了令人鼓舞的结果。这个项目可以满足经常和痛苦的心理社会需求,这通常是由多学科肿瘤学团队无法解决的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oncologist
Oncologist 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
309
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Oncologist® is dedicated to translating the latest research developments into the best multidimensional care for cancer patients. Thus, The Oncologist is committed to helping physicians excel in this ever-expanding environment through the publication of timely reviews, original studies, and commentaries on important developments. We believe that the practice of oncology requires both an understanding of a range of disciplines encompassing basic science related to cancer, translational research, and clinical practice, but also the socioeconomic and psychosocial factors that determine access to care and quality of life and function following cancer treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信