Validity and test-retest reliability of a modified version of the upper quarter Y balance test in athletes with spinal cord injury and lower limb amputation.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Mohammadreza Mahmoudkhani, Fatemeh Alizadeh, Mohammad Karimizadeh Ardakani, Zahra Fathi
{"title":"Validity and test-retest reliability of a modified version of the upper quarter Y balance test in athletes with spinal cord injury and lower limb amputation.","authors":"Mohammadreza Mahmoudkhani, Fatemeh Alizadeh, Mohammad Karimizadeh Ardakani, Zahra Fathi","doi":"10.1080/09593985.2024.2444386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Upper Quarter Y Balance Test (YBT-UQ) assesses upper limb dynamic balance in able-bodied individuals but lacks a reliable version for those with disabilities.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to introduce a modified YBT-UQ (mYBT-UQ) for physically impaired individuals (PI) and establish its validity and reliability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study involved 33 male athletes aged 18-55, divided into three equal groups: able-bodied, spinal cord injury with trunk control (SCI), and below-the-knee amputation (BKA). To ensure test validity, able-bodied athletes completed both tests. Test-retest reliability was evaluated by repeating the mYBT-UQ seven days after the first test by PI groups. The validity was assessed using the Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman plot. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) (2,1), standard error of measurement (SEM), and the minimal detectable change with 95% confidence (MDC95%) were calculated to assess relative and absolute reliability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were significant differences and excellent relationships between YBT-UQ and the mYBT-UQ. Also, the Bland-Altman plot showed minimal bias and an acceptable range of agreement. In athletes with BKA, the ICC (2,1) was above 0.90 for both limbs. The SEM ranged from 2.4%-2.7%, and MDC95% ranged from 6.7%-7.5%. In athletes with SCI, the ICC (2,1) ranged from 0.72-0.80. The SEM ranged from 3.1%-3.2% and MDC95% ranged from 8.6%-8.9%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results indicate that the mYBT-UQ is a reliable test to assess upper quarter dynamic balance in athletes with SCI and BKA. However, regarding the small sample size of the study, there is a need to conduct other research to establish the validity of the test.</p>","PeriodicalId":48699,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2024.2444386","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Upper Quarter Y Balance Test (YBT-UQ) assesses upper limb dynamic balance in able-bodied individuals but lacks a reliable version for those with disabilities.

Objective: This study aimed to introduce a modified YBT-UQ (mYBT-UQ) for physically impaired individuals (PI) and establish its validity and reliability.

Methods: The study involved 33 male athletes aged 18-55, divided into three equal groups: able-bodied, spinal cord injury with trunk control (SCI), and below-the-knee amputation (BKA). To ensure test validity, able-bodied athletes completed both tests. Test-retest reliability was evaluated by repeating the mYBT-UQ seven days after the first test by PI groups. The validity was assessed using the Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman plot. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) (2,1), standard error of measurement (SEM), and the minimal detectable change with 95% confidence (MDC95%) were calculated to assess relative and absolute reliability.

Results: There were significant differences and excellent relationships between YBT-UQ and the mYBT-UQ. Also, the Bland-Altman plot showed minimal bias and an acceptable range of agreement. In athletes with BKA, the ICC (2,1) was above 0.90 for both limbs. The SEM ranged from 2.4%-2.7%, and MDC95% ranged from 6.7%-7.5%. In athletes with SCI, the ICC (2,1) ranged from 0.72-0.80. The SEM ranged from 3.1%-3.2% and MDC95% ranged from 8.6%-8.9%.

Conclusion: The results indicate that the mYBT-UQ is a reliable test to assess upper quarter dynamic balance in athletes with SCI and BKA. However, regarding the small sample size of the study, there is a need to conduct other research to establish the validity of the test.

背景:上肢Y型平衡测试(YBT-UQ)可评估健全人的上肢动态平衡,但缺乏适用于残疾人的可靠版本:本研究旨在为肢体残疾人(PI)引入改良版 YBT-UQ(mYBT-UQ),并确定其有效性和可靠性:研究涉及 33 名年龄在 18-55 岁之间的男性运动员,他们被分为三个相同的组别:健全组、脊髓损伤躯干控制组(SCI)和膝下截肢组(BKA)。为确保测试的有效性,健全运动员同时完成了两项测试。在第一次测试七天后,由 PI 组重复进行 mYBT-UQ 测试,以评估重测可靠性。效度采用皮尔逊相关和布兰-阿尔特曼图进行评估。通过计算类内相关系数(ICC)(2,1)、测量标准误差(SEM)和 95% 置信度下的最小可检测变化(MDC95%)来评估相对和绝对可靠性:结果:YBT-UQ 与 mYBT-UQ 之间存在明显差异且关系良好。此外,布兰-阿尔特曼图显示偏差最小,一致性范围可接受。在患有 BKA 的运动员中,双肢的 ICC (2,1) 均高于 0.90。SEM在2.4%-2.7%之间,MDC95%在6.7%-7.5%之间。在患有 SCI 的运动员中,ICC(2,1)介于 0.72-0.80 之间。SEM为3.1%-3.2%,MDC95%为8.6%-8.9%:结果表明,mYBT-UQ 是评估 SCI 和 BKA 运动员上半身动态平衡的可靠测试。然而,由于研究样本量较小,有必要开展其他研究来确定该测试的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
300
期刊介绍: The aim of Physiotherapy Theory and Practice is to provide an international, peer-reviewed forum for the publication, dissemination, and discussion of recent developments and current research in physiotherapy/physical therapy. The journal accepts original quantitative and qualitative research reports, theoretical papers, systematic literature reviews, clinical case reports, and technical clinical notes. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice; promotes post-basic education through reports, reviews, and updates on all aspects of physiotherapy and specialties relating to clinical physiotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信