Deceased Donor Renal Allograft Utility in Adult Single and Multi-organ Transplantation in the United States.

IF 1.9 Q3 TRANSPLANTATION
Transplantation Direct Pub Date : 2024-12-18 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1097/TXD.0000000000001744
Peter J Altshuler, Adam S Bodzin, Kenneth A Andreoni, Pooja Singh, Anju Yadav, Jaime M Glorioso, Ashesh P Shah, Carlo Gerado B Ramirez, Warren R Maley, Adam M Frank
{"title":"Deceased Donor Renal Allograft Utility in Adult Single and Multi-organ Transplantation in the United States.","authors":"Peter J Altshuler, Adam S Bodzin, Kenneth A Andreoni, Pooja Singh, Anju Yadav, Jaime M Glorioso, Ashesh P Shah, Carlo Gerado B Ramirez, Warren R Maley, Adam M Frank","doi":"10.1097/TXD.0000000000001744","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Deceased donor multiorgan transplants utilizing kidneys (MOTs) can improve outcomes for multiorgan recipients but reduces kidneys for chronic renal failure patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database from 2015 through 2019, for adult deceased donor kidney transplants. Recipients were classified as kidney transplant alone (KTA) (n = 62,252) or MOTs pancreas-kidney, simultaneous pancreas-kidney (n = 3,976), liver-kidney, simultaneous liver-kidney (n = 3,212), heart-kidney, simultaneous heart-kidney (n = 808), and \"other\"-kidney, simultaneous \"other\" kidney (n = 73).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Liver, heart, and lung-alone transplants were at least 7 times more frequent than their MOT correlate, whereas the inverse was true with pancreas transplantation with SPKs being by far the most common pancreas transplant type. On average, KTA recipients waited between 2.8 and 21.4 times longer than MOTs, with SPKs waiting the longest of the MOT types. Predialysis initiation transplants were less frequent in KTAs compared with MOTs. Use of high-quality grafts according to Kidney Donor Profile Index < 35% was frequent among MOTs, but uncommon in KTAs who had an Estimated Post Transplant Survival score (EPTS) of >20%. For recipients older than 65, SPKs and SOKs were rare, but SLKs and SHKs had a higher fraction of recipients than KTAs and were much more likely to use a Kidney Donor Profile Index <35% kidney. SPKs and KTAs with an EPTS ≤20% had the best kidney graft survival. KTAs with an EPTS ≤80% had better kidney graft survival than SLKs, SHKs, and SOKs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights disparities in access to deceased donor kidneys for kidney-alone candidates versus MOTs and suggests opportunities to improve allocation.</p>","PeriodicalId":23225,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation Direct","volume":"11 1","pages":"e1744"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11658743/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation Direct","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000001744","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPLANTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Deceased donor multiorgan transplants utilizing kidneys (MOTs) can improve outcomes for multiorgan recipients but reduces kidneys for chronic renal failure patients.

Methods: We reviewed the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database from 2015 through 2019, for adult deceased donor kidney transplants. Recipients were classified as kidney transplant alone (KTA) (n = 62,252) or MOTs pancreas-kidney, simultaneous pancreas-kidney (n = 3,976), liver-kidney, simultaneous liver-kidney (n = 3,212), heart-kidney, simultaneous heart-kidney (n = 808), and "other"-kidney, simultaneous "other" kidney (n = 73).

Results: Liver, heart, and lung-alone transplants were at least 7 times more frequent than their MOT correlate, whereas the inverse was true with pancreas transplantation with SPKs being by far the most common pancreas transplant type. On average, KTA recipients waited between 2.8 and 21.4 times longer than MOTs, with SPKs waiting the longest of the MOT types. Predialysis initiation transplants were less frequent in KTAs compared with MOTs. Use of high-quality grafts according to Kidney Donor Profile Index < 35% was frequent among MOTs, but uncommon in KTAs who had an Estimated Post Transplant Survival score (EPTS) of >20%. For recipients older than 65, SPKs and SOKs were rare, but SLKs and SHKs had a higher fraction of recipients than KTAs and were much more likely to use a Kidney Donor Profile Index <35% kidney. SPKs and KTAs with an EPTS ≤20% had the best kidney graft survival. KTAs with an EPTS ≤80% had better kidney graft survival than SLKs, SHKs, and SOKs.

Conclusions: This study highlights disparities in access to deceased donor kidneys for kidney-alone candidates versus MOTs and suggests opportunities to improve allocation.

美国成人单器官和多器官移植中已故供体肾移植的效用。
背景:使用肾脏的已故供者多器官移植(MOTs)可以改善多器官受者的预后,但对于慢性肾衰竭患者会减少肾脏。方法:我们回顾了2015年至2019年的器官获取和移植网络数据库,其中包含成人已故供体肾脏移植。受者分为单独肾移植(KTA) (n = 62,252)或MOTs胰肾联合、胰肾联合(n = 3,976)、肝肾联合、肝肾联合(n = 3,212)、心肾联合、心肾联合(n = 808)和“其他”肾联合、“其他”肾联合(n = 73)。结果:肝脏、心脏和肺单独移植的频率至少是MOT相关的7倍,而胰腺移植的情况则相反,SPKs是迄今为止最常见的胰腺移植类型。平均而言,KTA接受者的等待时间是MOT的2.8到21.4倍,其中spk等待时间最长。与MOTs相比,kta中透析前启动移植的发生率较低。使用高质量的移植物根据肾供者概况指数20%。对于65岁以上的受者,SPKs和SOKs是罕见的,但SLKs和SHKs的受者比例高于KTAs,并且更有可能使用肾脏供者概况指数。结论:本研究强调了单独肾脏候选人与MOTs在获得已故供者肾脏方面的差异,并提出了改善分配的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transplantation Direct
Transplantation Direct TRANSPLANTATION-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
193
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信