Letermovir for prevention of recurrent CMV in high-risk allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Gyuri Han, Anat Stern, Yeon Joo Lee, Yuxuan Li, Parastoo B Dahi, Roni Tamari, Boglarka Gyurkocza, Ann A Jakubowski, Esperanza B Papadopoulos, Brian Shaffer, Miguel-Angel Perales, Karam M Obeid, Jo-Anne H Young, Genovefa A Papanicolaou
{"title":"Letermovir for prevention of recurrent CMV in high-risk allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients.","authors":"Gyuri Han, Anat Stern, Yeon Joo Lee, Yuxuan Li, Parastoo B Dahi, Roni Tamari, Boglarka Gyurkocza, Ann A Jakubowski, Esperanza B Papadopoulos, Brian Shaffer, Miguel-Angel Perales, Karam M Obeid, Jo-Anne H Young, Genovefa A Papanicolaou","doi":"10.1016/j.jtct.2024.12.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We evaluated letermovir (LTV) for secondary prophylaxis for cytomegalovirus (CMV) in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant recipients (HCT) at high-risk for CMV recurrence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Open-label study conducted at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and the University of Minnesota. Patients with clinically significant CMV infection (cs-CMVi) and ≥1 high-risk criteria for CMV who achieved viral suppression with standard CMV antivirals, received letermovir (LTV) secondary prophylaxis for up to 14 weeks. The primary endpoint was cs-CMVi at week 14. Secondary endpoints included, LTV resistance, CMV end-organ disease (EOD), CMV-related death and LTV related Adverse Events (AE) at week 14.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-six patients were analyzed (CMV seropositive 33, T-cell depleted HCT 25, cord blood allograft 5) were analyzed. By week 14, 5 patients met the primary endpoint of cs-CMVi, for a cumulative incidence of 14.9% (95% confidence interval 2.6 - 27.1). Four patients developed LTV breakthrough cs-CMVi (including 2 patients with confirmed LTV resistance). The remaining patient developed rebound cs-CMVI after premature discontinuation of LTV due to enrollment in a clinical trial. There were no cases of CMV EOD or CMV-related deaths or LTV related AE by week 14 or by week 24.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our data supports that LTV secondary prophylaxis is safe and effective in high-risk HCT recipients.</p>","PeriodicalId":23283,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation and Cellular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation and Cellular Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtct.2024.12.010","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We evaluated letermovir (LTV) for secondary prophylaxis for cytomegalovirus (CMV) in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant recipients (HCT) at high-risk for CMV recurrence.

Methods: Open-label study conducted at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and the University of Minnesota. Patients with clinically significant CMV infection (cs-CMVi) and ≥1 high-risk criteria for CMV who achieved viral suppression with standard CMV antivirals, received letermovir (LTV) secondary prophylaxis for up to 14 weeks. The primary endpoint was cs-CMVi at week 14. Secondary endpoints included, LTV resistance, CMV end-organ disease (EOD), CMV-related death and LTV related Adverse Events (AE) at week 14.

Results: Thirty-six patients were analyzed (CMV seropositive 33, T-cell depleted HCT 25, cord blood allograft 5) were analyzed. By week 14, 5 patients met the primary endpoint of cs-CMVi, for a cumulative incidence of 14.9% (95% confidence interval 2.6 - 27.1). Four patients developed LTV breakthrough cs-CMVi (including 2 patients with confirmed LTV resistance). The remaining patient developed rebound cs-CMVI after premature discontinuation of LTV due to enrollment in a clinical trial. There were no cases of CMV EOD or CMV-related deaths or LTV related AE by week 14 or by week 24.

Conclusions: Our data supports that LTV secondary prophylaxis is safe and effective in high-risk HCT recipients.

来替莫韦对高风险异基因造血细胞移植(HCT)受者复发 CMV 的预防。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
15.60%
发文量
1061
审稿时长
51 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信